Message boards :
Number crunching :
What heppend with NVIDIA WUs?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Igogo ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Dec 04 Posts: 125 Credit: 65,303,299 RAC: 44
|
More than 2 weeks I don't have NVIDIA WUs. What heppend? |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874
|
More than 2 weeks I don't have NVIDIA WUs. What heppend? Look in your logs. You probably didn't ask for any. |
|
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4
|
Here's a repost of Ageless's post in the BOINC 7 Change Log 6.13 and news thread: EXTRA WARNING The new BOINC 6.13 range is using completely new, from the ground up written code for many of its parts. It is not to be used if you are not an alpha tester. It is not to be used on all of your machines, just on one. When it doesn't work, report your problems to the developers and return to the latest 6.12.recommended. At this time we're specifically testing whether or not the new CPU/GPU scheduling code works without using debt, and if projects will fetch work. This is not a version that you install and walk away from, it needs constant checking, including the use of all the correct client configuration flags. Make sure your log files are of sufficient size so you can log through the night. Minimum required flags to report with are <cpu_sched_debug>, <rr_simulation>, <sched_op_debug>, <work_fetch_debug> Claggy |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874
|
May I add to that, please. Do not run experimental versions of BOINC on live projects, unless you also subscribe to the associated boinc_alpha mailing list, and have time to read and act upon any recall or hotfix notices for builds which turn out to be buggy. The recent alerts on this message board relating to wingmates receiving negative credit, were tracked down to users running the 6 July copy of BOINC v6.13.0, without applying the hotfixes released and notified via the above list on 7 July. |
kittyman ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51586 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004
|
I'd like to report that I have been Beta testing 6.10.58 for some time now, and the devs have done a wonderful job with it...... (Hides behind his RAC to ward off the incoming flak)....LOL. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."
|
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0
|
I'd like to report that I have been Beta testing 6.10.58 for some time now, and the devs have done a wonderful job with it...... LoL, would that be official 6.10.58 ? or my modified 6.10.58 with per applications DCFs ? "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
kittyman ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51586 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004
|
I'd like to report that I have been Beta testing 6.10.58 for some time now, and the devs have done a wonderful job with it...... You know how I luv modifications. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."
|
Igogo ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Dec 04 Posts: 125 Credit: 65,303,299 RAC: 44
|
I try to return to previous version. It don't see old job. What wrong? How I can return for previous version? |
Igogo ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Dec 04 Posts: 125 Credit: 65,303,299 RAC: 44
|
Fixed. I must uninstall previous version then install new |
Igogo ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Dec 04 Posts: 125 Credit: 65,303,299 RAC: 44
|
YAY! I have CUDA tasks |
BANZAI56 Send message Joined: 17 May 00 Posts: 139 Credit: 47,299,948 RAC: 2
|
I'd like to report that I have been Beta testing 6.10.58 for some time now, and the devs have done a wonderful job with it...... Agreed! Ohh & BTW: Newer is not always the same as better... |
|
bill Send message Joined: 16 Jun 99 Posts: 861 Credit: 29,352,955 RAC: 0
|
Agreed! Ohh & BTW: Newer is not always the same as better... But but but, it's NEWER and SHINY! MUST HAVE SHINY, am UBERGEEK. |
©2026 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.