Non-Specific Discussion on Board Moderation

Message boards : Politics : Non-Specific Discussion on Board Moderation
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

AuthorMessage
Eric Korpela Project Donor
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 1382
Credit: 54,506,847
RAC: 60
United States
Message 1072529 - Posted: 31 Jan 2011, 1:18:02 UTC - in response to Message 1072347.  
Last modified: 31 Jan 2011, 1:23:29 UTC

Hi Champ,

There's only one rule: The forum admin makes the rules. I changed many rules in my stint as forum admin. Most of them were unwritten. And I did not hold myself to them. I changed them as needed. We had cases where moderators tried to make rules without my approval, or interpret approval to hide one post as a general rule to hide all similar posts. Sometimes I let those rules stand, other times I didn't.

The "rule" for moderator rotation was for my benefit as admin. I posted it for informational purposes. In fact, it wasn't even a rule, it was a policy. As forum admin, Fred is able to change that policy without notice to anyone but himself. He doesn't need my approval to do so. He doesn't clear changes to the moderation crew with anyone. He could, if he wanted, fire all the moderators tomorrow and institute new ones. Or he could never rotate mods again. All of it is his call. So far I think he's doing a great job, because I'm not getting many complaints.

The goal, of course, is to maintain civil discussion on the forums. So far, things seem to going about as well as any large public forum goes. Of course with any change, there will be some dissenters. We can't possibly keep everyone happy, including former moderators.

Sorry for any confusion about who posted this. Apparently Angela was using my laptop.
@SETIEric@qoto.org (Mastodon)

ID: 1072529 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1072578 - Posted: 31 Jan 2011, 4:20:07 UTC - in response to Message 1072529.  

Might I suggest if Fred has the time to hide posts that state rules or policies that are no longer accurate.

ID: 1072578 · Report as offensive
Profile champ
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 03
Posts: 3642
Credit: 1,489,147
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 1072821 - Posted: 31 Jan 2011, 20:58:08 UTC

Hi Eric,

this is funny. On the boards we have written rules to follow them. I supported all your rules and followed them. Look into my posting history, you dont will find lots of hidden postings. Now you tell us, that the posted rules here was something like a suggestion? Fred can turn the rules like he wants and dont inform the posters here? I have no doubt, that Fred is doing a good job, but sometimes i cant follow administration here.

For example, he gave me a muzzle about talking something special, which is a important part of the Seti history. This part is the main part for my leaving here. There was a group about 25 persons (5 more or less?), that interrupted the boards. I have never seen a rule, which told us, that it is forbidden to talk about them.

After my leaving here, i joined an international board where i feel well suited now. There were funny and adult people from all over the world.

I would like to give the Seti boards a big huge and my best wishes for the future. Here i had a good and hard school of forum postings. I learned a lot and will keep it on for other boards.

After this posting, i have detached all my machines and deleted Boinc. Maybe, sometimes i will come back and we can chat again.

God bless you all.

champ
ID: 1072821 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1072828 - Posted: 31 Jan 2011, 21:35:31 UTC - in response to Message 1072344.  

Are you sure those are the current rules?

I thought the current rule was Fred's the boss and writes the rules.

That is the way it should be..and if a moderator were abusing those rules to settle personal grudges then I would assume that moderator would be removed before it caused a large amount of dissension on the boards.

I don't see any sign that a significant amount of posters have any problems with the way the moderators are enforcing peace on the boards and making it a safe place to post.

I know that in the last couple of months I have felt that things have really changed for the better and I feel safer posting. That to me is a sure sign that the moderators and ultimately the admin have got something right.

It isn't just about having rules and enforcing them to letter but about understanding that all the posters, whether a moderator likes them or not, are people and deserve some respect. It is not a moderators job to drive people away they don't like. It is a moderators job to see that all the different people can rub along, differences and all. After all, isn't that what makes the seti boards so special?
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 1072828 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1072916 - Posted: 1 Feb 2011, 1:40:41 UTC - in response to Message 1072828.  

Are you sure those are the current rules?

I thought the current rule was Fred's the boss and writes the rules.

That is the way it should be..and if a moderator were abusing those rules to settle personal grudges then I would assume that moderator would be removed before it caused a large amount of dissension on the boards.

I'd hope even if it was just one person complaining that abuse be stopped PDQ. And yes we are all human until we find ET.

Some wise person told me "Don't fire the volunteers."

ID: 1072916 · Report as offensive
Profile soft^spirit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 6497
Credit: 34,134,168
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1072933 - Posted: 1 Feb 2011, 3:02:41 UTC

From my read, any decision can be applealed. I would also note that if you bug staff (or Berkley) with stuff that they should NOT have to deal with, it could easily backfire. So caution note.

Just because someone else was worse, and the moderators missed it, does not mean it is okay.
Janice
ID: 1072933 · Report as offensive
Profile The Gas Giant
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 01
Posts: 1904
Credit: 2,646,654
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1073060 - Posted: 1 Feb 2011, 10:22:11 UTC
Last modified: 1 Feb 2011, 10:26:12 UTC

I always thought that you couldn't post things in relation to moderator actions....

I think someone is bitterrrrrrr....
ID: 1073060 · Report as offensive
Robert Ribbeck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 02
Posts: 644
Credit: 5,283,174
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1073962 - Posted: 3 Feb 2011, 23:24:24 UTC

You forget WHO is in charge
mere mention of anything mod related could or will get you banished
ask me I'm proff
ID: 1073962 · Report as offensive
Robert Ribbeck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 02
Posts: 644
Credit: 5,283,174
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1073963 - Posted: 3 Feb 2011, 23:26:22 UTC - in response to Message 1073060.  
Last modified: 3 Feb 2011, 23:30:18 UTC

I always thought that you couldn't post things in relation to moderator actions....

I think someone is bitterrrrrrr....


unless you have credentials

go CHAMP
ID: 1073963 · Report as offensive
Robert Ribbeck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 02
Posts: 644
Credit: 5,283,174
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1074475 - Posted: 5 Feb 2011, 20:48:17 UTC

how about a board for open discussion
little mod intervention & censuring
Ok that's what politics was supposed to be
ID: 1074475 · Report as offensive
Profile soft^spirit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 6497
Credit: 34,134,168
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1076641 - Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 1:46:34 UTC

ID: 1076641 · Report as offensive
Profile soft^spirit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 6497
Credit: 34,134,168
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1077051 - Posted: 14 Feb 2011, 3:08:52 UTC

Okay a bit more of a serious and calm note.

The following are my views, not necessarily of anyone else including moderating volunteers, SETI@home staff, nor UCB.

Moderation is simple in principle. Look at the rules, understand the rules, enforce the rules. No brainer right? No one should be surprised or upset right?
Ummm.. not quite.

You have people involved. Nothing is so simple. If you are too loose and let people get away with crossing them, people get unhappy and/or leave because
it becomes a mad house. If you are too tight with them, you get blamed with censorship, being a tyrant, etc ad nauseum. The most active moderators are going to be the least loved, those that do the least will stay under the radar.
It is possible to be effective in the background, but someone has to take the blame.

There are few thank you's. Guaranteed opportunity to turn friends to (perceived) enemies, and it is only something an insane masochist should enjoy.

Now.. why would ANYONE subject themselves to that? Great rewards? Um.. no.. not there. Prestige? Uh.. yeah as much as a septic tank cleaner. To create a perfect world? Uh.. guess again. While cleaning the sewer pipes there is always someone pulling that "flush" handle upstream.

The only reason I can see why someone would want to (other than devious designs, to try to abuse it, which is bound to backfire) is simple. Because it needs done. You need to TRY to balance out what people feel they should be able to say with what is going to hurt and inflame people.. to try to find that balance between anarchy and police state. Because it is there we can find civility. The chance to disagree and yet treat each other fairly. This can not be done by one person, but only by a team of people all SEEKING that equalibrium.

And if it is perfectly executed, unanimously agreed upon, and done with everyone involved seeing and dancing together.. There is still going to be unhappy people. There are still going to be hurt feelings, still people calling for the head of this person or that person. And that.. is the ironic reward. That the grumbling and some times screaming goes on, and the project moves on. Because as varied and disagreeable as we ALL can be, we all came together for one purpose: To try and help find ET.

That is why I am here, and I hope that is why everyone is here. Beyond that,
we are just ordinary every day people. No more, and certainly no less.

/endsoapbox
Janice
ID: 1077051 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1081650 - Posted: 26 Feb 2011, 15:18:22 UTC

Oh, and if there is some......
Non-specific loving needed here for the mod crew.

I can give that too......

If you........

Double bonus.

Kitties have a lotta luv to give.
Can you accept?

Just don't poke, please.

"That's fine."
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1081650 · Report as offensive
Profile soft^spirit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 6497
Credit: 34,134,168
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1081657 - Posted: 26 Feb 2011, 16:05:39 UTC

Good morning.

Please keep things general. I do really hate getting up in the morning and finding other peoples messes to clean up.


Janice
ID: 1081657 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1082058 - Posted: 27 Feb 2011, 15:27:07 UTC

Is there a recall procedure for mods?

I happen to know one who should be.

Not being specific or anything.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1082058 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Message boards : Politics : Non-Specific Discussion on Board Moderation


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.