Message boards :
Number crunching :
GTX 460
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
I get the following: 25-Feb-2011 06:08:41 [---] OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Home Premium x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 25-Feb-2011 06:08:41 [---] Memory: 4.00 GB physical, 8.00 GB virtual 25-Feb-2011 06:08:41 [---] Disk: 1.36 TB total, 1.16 TB free 25-Feb-2011 06:08:41 [---] Local time is UTC +0 hours 25-Feb-2011 06:08:41 [---] NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 460 (driver version 26658, CUDA version 3020, compute capability 2.1, 993MB, 717 GFLOPS peak) 25-Feb-2011 06:08:41 [---] ATI GPU 0: ATI Radeon HD5700 series (Juniper) (CAL version 1.4.1016, 1024MB, 1360 GFLOPS peak) While Einstein's BRP3cuda32 app reports: [18:39:54][5696][INFO ] Starting data processing... [18:39:54][5696][INFO ] CUDA global memory status (initial GPU state, including context): ------> Used in total: 152 MB (842 MB free / 994 MB total) -> Used by this application (assuming a single GPU task): 0 MB [18:39:54][5696][INFO ] Using CUDA device #0 "GeForce GTX 460" (336 CUDA cores / 1075.20 GFLOPS) [18:39:54][5696][INFO ] Version of installed CUDA driver: 3020 [18:39:54][5696][INFO ] Version of CUDA driver API used: 3020 I tend to believe the Einstein figures because i don't think the GTX460 is fully clocked up when Boinc does it's figures, looking at different Cuda GPU's results at Einstein seem to indicate that 266.58 drivers report higher flops than 260.99, Fred's figure are very low because he's running Boinc 6.10.43, 6.10.44 had a fix for that: - client: NVIDIA peak FLOPS estimate was wrong for Fermi (32 cores, not 8). Claggy ![]() |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
=================== 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM Processor: 8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz [Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7] 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM Processor: 256.00 KB cache 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 syscall nx lm vmx smx tm2 popcnt aes pbe 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Home Premium x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM Memory: 7.98 GB physical, 15.96 GB virtual 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM Disk: 108.85 GB total, 16.87 GB free 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM Local time is UTC -6 hours 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 460 (driver version 26658, CUDA version 3020, compute capability 2.1, 993MB, 605 GFLOPS peak) 2/26/2011 4:12:35 AM SETI@home Found app_info.xml; using anonymous platform ==================== installed gtx 460 today GPU usage is 1%-5% I changed the count to 0.5 in the app_info. Am I missing something? would like to see the gpu kickin :) Thanks http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=5757062 |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
What clocks are you running? Mine are: 800/1600/2000 for core/shaders/memory (Factory O/C) Claggy |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
What clocks are you running? Mine are: MSI Afterburner says 1800/810/405 GPU-Z says 675/1350/900 |
![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0 ![]() |
(I think a light came on, or that TRAIN is getting really close!) I believe the varying benchmark results being reported are the result of the differences in hardware and software we are using. If we tested each GTX 460 (or any component, really) one by one, in the same machine, or on very nearly identical platforms, we'd better get relatively consistent results. Video card results might vary some based on clock rates or memory totals, but the results should be fairly consistent for each configuration. Well, of course, that isn't what's happening here. Different platforms, different BOINC/project softwares equals different results for the same (or nearly identical) component. That doesn't mean the results are useless, not at all. But, comparisons are most relevent between similar systems. The more similar each compared system is, the more equal the performance results should be. Martin |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
Do I need to abort the WU I have in order to get GPU WU's? |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
Do I need to abort the WU I have in order to get GPU WU's? No, Boinc asks for work for CPU's and GPU's separately, When you ran the Lunatics installer, did you select the X32f Cuda app, as well as the AKV8 SSSE3x MB app and the r409 AP app? Claggy |
Dave Send message Joined: 29 Mar 02 Posts: 778 Credit: 25,001,396 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Might be worth reinstalling Lunatics & ticking the box to allow GPU. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Seems like lots of GFLOPS around here. My startup messages: Fri Feb 25 18:21:17 2011 | | NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 460 (driver version 26658, CUDA version 3020, compute capability 2.1, 768MB, 717 GFLOPS peak) ![]() |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
There is only one CUDA option in the installer . Enable processing Multibeam task on Nvidia CUDA GPU I did tick it enabled. Enabled Astropulse 5.05r409 Enabled SSSE3x |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
Make sure 'Use NVIDIA GPU Enforced by version 6.10+' is set to 'yes' in your SETI@home preferences Claggy |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
When you used the optimized installer did you check x32f CUDA app box, all I see is CPU work on your machine. This is the installer I used Win64 Lunatics' Unified Installer v0.37 I dont see "x32f CUDA app box" I guess Im more lost than I thought I was :) edit: I do see this in the app_info file <name>Lunatics_x32f_win32_cuda30_preview.exe</name> So it is running ? Thanks! |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
Make sure 'Use NVIDIA GPU Enforced by version 6.10+' is set to 'yes' in your SETI@home preferences I did , It is :) Thanks! |
Tony DeBari Send message Joined: 31 Mar 01 Posts: 29 Credit: 14,006,420 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Make sure 'Use NVIDIA GPU Enforced by version 6.10+' is set to 'yes' in your SETI@home preferences One other thing to check is if you have set up local preferences that may be overriding the Web-based preferences. I've been tripped up by that one more than once... -- Tony D. |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
Make sure 'Use NVIDIA GPU Enforced by version 6.10+' is set to 'yes' in your SETI@home preferences You can't set Project preferences in Boinc Manager, so they can't be over-riden, Claggy |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
Make sure 'Use NVIDIA GPU Enforced by version 6.10+' is set to 'yes' in your SETI@home preferences Is Boinc even asking for GPU work? it should say the following: 26/02/2011 19:41:12 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for CPU and GPU If it isn't, then eithier you're got No New Tasks Set, or you haven't got 'Use GPU' enabled at the same Venue you're set your host to (ie default, home, school or work), or the MB Cuda app isn't installed, I suspect it's a preference problem as you didn't even get Stock Cuda work, Claggy |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
Is Boinc even asking for GPU work? it should say the following: Before I installed the 460 I had 400+ WU (10 day supply). After installing the 460 I also did Lunitacs unified installer I have seen it ask and get CPU WU. It has not asked for GPU. Right now its not asking for anything :( |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
Shut Boinc Down, and rerun the Lunatics Installer, make sure you're selected the 3 Options, with the centre option set to SSSE3x, then restart Boinc, Make sure you haven't got 'No New Tasks' Set, Make Sure your Host is set to the same Venue where 'Use Nvidia' is set to yes, Edit: whatever you're done has worked, you're now got 17 Nvidia GPU tasks, Now you're running Anonymous platform, the apps won't be auto updated by the project, you'll need to keep an eye out here, or at Lunatics for a new Installer, as Setiathome v7 has just entered Beta, and when it goes live here you'll likely find you'll get no more Seti enhanced work, Claggy |
nwwii Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,753,430 RAC: 0 |
Found the problem. I had suspended 8 Astropulse WU, I didn't want all 8 cpus doing just AP. I resumed them and updated boinc Got 17 GPU WU ran 2 GPU WU each took 4:08 :) Thanks for all the help!! |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.