Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (42) Server problems
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 11 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Wow.. After days of trying to get APs and only getting one or two a day.. I go to sleep and wake up to find a task list full of them. 2010-12-16 07:50:54|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 1 new tasks 2010-12-16 11:11:15|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 15 new tasks 2010-12-16 11:33:12|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 2 new tasks 2010-12-16 12:04:46|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 2 new tasks 2010-12-16 12:25:53|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 6 new tasks I really need about 15 more, but due to some issue that can't be found/resolved at the moment, occasionally an AP will run 8-16 hours longer than normal. If I save that WU and run it in stand-alone mode, 23-25 hours like normal. So right now my DCF is off by about 10 hours. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13832 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
All of which goes to prove that Ned Ludd knew what he was talking about when he said that the download bandwidth needed to be more intelligently managed. I agree that 85% of available bandwidth would be better than 95%+, but looking at Scarecrow's Graphs the slope for Work in Progress in steeper this week than last. So as bad as thing are when maxed out, it's better for feeding the demand than only using 60% or so of the available bandwidth. Grant Darwin NT |
Terror Australis Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 1817 Credit: 262,693,308 RAC: 44 |
I think the point may be proved that its maxxed out bandwidth that causes ghosts. All my machines have had at least 40 resends in the last few hours. First time I've had (potential) ghosts since the project came back up. As I type this all are in "Project Backoff" with some units showing as much as 20 minutes elapsed. T.A. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14672 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
All of which goes to prove that Ned Ludd knew what he was talking about when he said that the download bandwidth needed to be more intelligently managed. "Work in progress" is not the same thing as feeding the demand. One of my machines currently has 9 tasks ready to run, but 248 "in progress" but still trying to download. Ghosts are also counted in "work in progress", remember. |
Frizz Send message Joined: 17 May 99 Posts: 271 Credit: 5,852,934 RAC: 0 |
I agree that 85% of available bandwidth would be better than 95%+ ... +1 I have stop-and-go traffic at the moment. This is how my log looks like (since hours): ... 17/12/2010 00:35:03 SETI@home Started download of ap_24se10ab_B4_P0_00189_20101216_10901.wu 17/12/2010 00:35:10 Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 17/12/2010 00:35:10 SETI@home Temporarily failed download of ap_25se10aa_B5_P0_00352_20101216_14500.wu: HTTP error 17/12/2010 00:35:10 SETI@home Backing off 1 min 0 sec on download of ap_25se10aa_B5_P0_00352_20101216_14500.wu 17/12/2010 00:35:11 Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. 17/12/2010 00:35:32 SETI@home Started download of ap_24se10ab_B4_P0_00198_20101216_10901.wu 17/12/2010 00:36:01 Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 17/12/2010 00:36:01 SETI@home Temporarily failed download of ap_24se10ab_B4_P0_00189_20101216_10901.wu: HTTP error 17/12/2010 00:36:01 SETI@home Backing off 3 hr 8 min 0 sec on download of ap_24se10ab_B4_P0_00189_20101216_10901.wu 17/12/2010 00:36:01 SETI@home Started download of ap_10se10aa_B3_P0_00025_20101216_06398.wu 17/12/2010 00:36:02 Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. ... |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14672 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
One of my machines currently has 9 tasks ready to run, but 248 "in progress" but still trying to download. In the four hours since I posted that, the score for that machine is: Crunched 9, downloaded 0. Still 248 waiting to download. GPUGrid gets another timeslice ;-) |
Lionel Send message Joined: 25 Mar 00 Posts: 680 Credit: 563,640,304 RAC: 597 |
just did a quick check on 1 box that is not downloading wus at the moment ... 571 wus waiting to be crunched 618 wus alledgedly in progress according to seti ghosts 47 |
OTS Send message Joined: 6 Jan 08 Posts: 371 Credit: 20,533,537 RAC: 0 |
When I look at mine, I have 80 wu on my machine with SETI reporting 7 valid, 57 pending, and 2 in error. That totals 146 which is what SETI says I have. I don't think I have any ghosts at the moment unless I am counting something in the total I shouldn't, but it sure would be a coincidence if that was the case. |
Dirk Sadowski Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
I am not terribly worried: I've got 4 AP units that BOINC thinks will take 200 hours (experience tells me 18 - 20 hours is more accurate). If you let run opt. project apps, you have added <flops> to your app_info.xml file? |
Lionel Send message Joined: 25 Mar 00 Posts: 680 Credit: 563,640,304 RAC: 597 |
It appears the limits are still in place... |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
Right now I have 167 cuda's and 2 MB's downloading to one machine. It is running at about 22kpbs x 4 WU's at a time. Seems to be doing pretty good on my end. Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
Gundolf Jahn Send message Joined: 19 Sep 00 Posts: 3184 Credit: 446,358 RAC: 0 |
Right now I have 167 cuda's and 2 MB's downloading to one machine... CUDAs are MBs too. ;-) (Sorry, couldn't stop myself:-) Gruß, Gundolf |
KB7RZF Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 2 |
Right now I have 167 cuda's and 2 MB's downloading to one machine... But its 2 different apps. :-P LOL |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
Right now I have 167 cuda's and 2 MB's downloading to one machine... I'm well aware of that, just figured you could decipher what I meant. Slight mishap on wording but the point got across. Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34345 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
MB download is very fast but astropulses takes forever. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51477 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
That is because of the size of the download for AP tasks. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34345 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
No its because of the badwith. On MB task i have 30 K/s On AP only 1 - 3 K/s. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
From what I have seen on my machine is I'm not limited per download but per computer how fast I can download. Last night I was getting work units at 22kbps on one WU but 10 on another etc. I seem to stay, combined, around 35-40kbps while downloading. Is there a limit placed on the speed from Seti or is this a bottlenecking issue? I've never paid attention to my speeds on download until here lately. Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
When the pipe isn't saturated, I would be able to download MBs in ~1 second, so 300-400k/sec. I would have expected that when there is still 50mbit of unused throughput on the pipe, I could use all 18mbit of my download speed for APs. Unfortunately, my observation on this is that it will only run between 50-200k/sec for AP downloads. I'm not complaining at all, but there does seem to be some kind of throttling somewhere. It takes between 60-180 seconds for each AP to download for me, but it isn't my hardware, because at any time, I can go download java from oracle's website and get 2.2MB/sec. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
When the pipe isn't saturated, I would be able to download MBs in ~1 second, so 300-400k/sec. I would have expected that when there is still 50mbit of unused throughput on the pipe, I could use all 18mbit of my download speed for APs. Unfortunately, my observation on this is that it will only run between 50-200k/sec for AP downloads. Yeah there is throttling indeed. Tonight I'm getting about 60kbps on my 30Mbit line. Should be getting much higher speeds, but your download speed will also be affected by your routing to the server etc. If there is congestion other places along the way it slows things down. However they are throttled on their end, and if they weren't you would possibly be getting worse speeds as everyone ate up everything! Not sure how accurate their cricket graphs are but the highest I've ever seen it was about 97mbps, so kind of makes you wonder what QoS they do have running. Right now it's only at 79Mbps! The wave slowing down? Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.