Up (Dec 07 2010)

Author	Message
Jaye Ellen Send message Joined: 29 Nov 08 Posts: 26 Credit: 20,945,032 RAC: 45	Message 1055693 - Posted: 13 Dec 2010, 18:49:37 UTC - in response to Message 1055677. Sorry about the double-post; I looked for the original posting but for whatever reason missed it. Thank you for the update on Worf's status! Jaye Ellen ID: 1055693 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36828 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1055728 - Posted: 13 Dec 2010, 22:07:15 UTC - in response to Message 1055692. what am I doing wrong? Removed and reinstalled twice, can not get any work units. It is a small, slow machind but it WAS doing something for the cause, but now it does absolutely nothing. Any help is mucdh appreciated! Jaye Ellen Burke This is a question that should've been placed in the Number Crunching forum but if you had bothered to read the other posts in this thread you would've have posted this in the first place. Cheers. ID: 1055728 ·

Matt Lebofsky Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Mar 99 Posts: 1444 Credit: 957,058 RAC: 0	Message 1055763 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 0:02:45 UTC It's late in the day so I don't feel like starting another thread, but the raid resync finished up and I just fired up the splitters. We'll see how this goes. I'm not entirely certain we're out of the woods yet. - Matt -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude ID: 1055763 ·

Claggy Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4	Message 1055765 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 0:11:50 UTC - in response to Message 1055763. Thanks for the update Matt, Claggy ID: 1055765 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874	Message 1055769 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 0:30:24 UTC - in response to Message 1055763. Last modified: 14 Dec 2010, 0:33:11 UTC It's late in the day so I don't feel like starting another thread, but the raid resync finished up and I just fired up the splitters. We'll see how this goes. I'm not entirely certain we're out of the woods yet. - Matt Matt, do you have time to check the upload servers? Still nothing shifting here, and not as much as I'd expect on Cricket, either. Edit - OK, they seem to have started just as I typed. Now we just have congestion ;-) ID: 1055769 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1055775 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 1:18:18 UTC - in response to Message 1055763. Last modified: 14 Dec 2010, 2:18:13 UTC It's late in the day so I don't feel like starting another thread, but the raid resync finished up and I just fired up the splitters. We'll see how this goes. I'm not entirely certain we're out of the woods yet. - Matt One word, ZFS. ZFS don't need to rebuild the empty space. Does this server have a hardware raid solution? I thing software raid is faster now, especially since multiple core processors. Also in the same sence that software modems gave you a lower ping in on line games. ID: 1055775 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1055778 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 1:40:15 UTC - in response to Message 1055515. FYI, a disk failure on worf (the raw data storage server) which locked up the RAID requiring a cold reboot (and nobody is around/able to get up to the lab to do so). Only public downside is we ran out of work to send. This'll get fixed Monday morning. - Matt No hot spare! Never seen a degraded array which needed a reboot. ID: 1055778 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1055802 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 3:41:34 UTC - in response to Message 1055778. Last modified: 14 Dec 2010, 4:00:01 UTC lots of work is flowing out, looks like the splitters kept running at least for a while when the hiccup happened. edit, results ready to send is building. one has to wonder why the download server can't keep up, denial of service as has been posted many times before sounds like the culprit. ID: 1055802 ·

Josef W. Segur Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0	Message 1055844 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 5:54:12 UTC - in response to Message 1055802. ...results ready to send is building. one has to wonder why the download server can't keep up, denial of service as has been posted many times before sounds like the culprit. ?? There's no reason to think the download servers couldn't deliver more work if the download link could handle it. In the first 5 hours after the splitters were turned on, the Schedulers told hosts to download more work than the link can handle. It would have taken over 116 Mbps of bandwidth to actually get the increase in "Results out in the field" delivered. The splitters are of course producing new work even faster, that's where the growth in ready to send comes from. Joe ID: 1055844 ·

David S Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 18352 Credit: 27,761,924 RAC: 12	Message 1055915 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 11:39:03 UTC Last modified: 14 Dec 2010, 11:43:55 UTC It looks like something happened again overnight. Ready to send is back down to 1 as of 0530 CST. Four splitters are showing "Not running." [edit]That's four out of five mb splitters down, in addition to the two ap splitters that were disabled last night and still are.[/edit] It appears I got one new task, though. David David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. ID: 1055915 ·

-ShEm- Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Feb 00 Posts: 139 Credit: 4,129,448 RAC: 0	Message 1055917 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 11:48:33 UTC - in response to Message 1055915. Last modified: 14 Dec 2010, 11:50:35 UTC It looks like something happened again overnight. Ready to send is back down to 1 as of 0530 CST. Four splitters are showing "Not running." [edit]That's four out of five mb splitters down, in addition to the two ap splitters that were disabled last night and still are.[/edit] It appears I got one new task, though. David Look a few cm's to the right of where you looked and all will be revealed (hint: Splitter Status - MB-tape-progress) ID: 1055917 ·

soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6497 Credit: 34,134,168 RAC: 0	Message 1055921 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 12:14:14 UTC What strikes me is with the splitters offline (empty it appears, except for AP) that the bandwidth has stayed maxed for over 2 hours. Janice ID: 1055921 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36828 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1055922 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 12:15:03 UTC - in response to Message 1055917. It looks like something happened again overnight. Ready to send is back down to 1 as of 0530 CST. Four splitters are showing "Not running." [edit]That's four out of five mb splitters down, in addition to the two ap splitters that were disabled last night and still are.[/edit] It appears I got one new task, though. David Look a few cm's to the right of where you looked and all will be revealed (hint: Splitter Status - MB-tape-progress) Yep Oscar sure made short work of those files but I'm sure that someone will throw several more in in the morning. ;) Cheers. ID: 1055922 ·

AnneBrodie Send message Joined: 16 Jul 00 Posts: 4 Credit: 246,319 RAC: 0	Message 1056097 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 21:04:26 UTC - in response to Message 1053678. Einsein defo slows my computer up. 'In the depths of the lunatic asylum, the Bossybabe is queen' Shakespeare [not Bill - his sister] ID: 1056097 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.