Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (40) Server problems
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 11 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
ScarabDrowner Send message Joined: 13 Sep 03 Posts: 90 Credit: 456,378 RAC: 0 |
Sad, still rationing work and sending the message that power users are no longer needed...At least it seems that way to me... Don't take it personally. A lot of folks, non-power-users included are feeling the restrictions. Look at my stats, I'm nowhere near a power-user, yet I've got 2 seti work units on this computer. I get a new one only when I send one in. |
gizbar Send message Joined: 7 Jan 01 Posts: 586 Credit: 21,087,774 RAC: 0 |
I'll pray to ET for this to happen. ET won't help you. He's still trying to find enough bandwidth to phone home. :o) Giz. A proud GPU User Server Donor! |
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6657 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
It seems limits are still in place. If there is going to be an outage, time is running out to load up. These next 4 hours is all I will get before going to bed, and then off to work in the morning. I'm counting down the days at 387 years till I can retire and spend as much time as needed at SETI and Lunatics. :D Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
Dirk Sadowski Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
I missed something? This week we don't have a 3 day outage? My machines have WUs for ~ 1 1/2 days, and get the famous: Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks Message from server: No work sent Message from server: This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress How they can get enough WUs for to bridge the 3 day outage? %-( |
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6657 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
I missed something? From what I read we will be having a 3 day outage, as they have more plans to test Morks memory. The limits are still intact, so none of us are going to be able to load up. I could be wrong, but it wouldn't be the first time, nor the last. Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
hiamps Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 4292 Credit: 72,971,319 RAC: 0 |
Sad, still rationing work and sending the message that power users are no longer needed...At least it seems that way to me... It sucks and everyone is sending right away trying to get more so everything is pegged. Had they let people fill their caches it would be normal by now.... Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons... And no good credit hound! |
Terror Australis Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 1817 Credit: 262,693,308 RAC: 44 |
It sucks and everyone is sending right away trying to get more so everything is pegged. Had they let people fill their caches it would be normal by now.... I don't think so, It took 4 days just to get most people up to the limit. To fill all caches would have doubled the number of units to be sent out which would have maxxed the server out even more. Without the limits the cruncher getting the most units would have been "Ghost" and he/she/it gets more than their fair share anyway :-) T.A. |
Terror Australis Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 1817 Credit: 262,693,308 RAC: 44 |
Interesting looking at the number of resends I've been getting. Lots of 2's and 3's, a fair few 4's and 5's but the best one is an 8 (been around a bit that one). T.A. |
Geek@Play Send message Joined: 31 Jul 01 Posts: 2467 Credit: 86,146,931 RAC: 0 |
For this past weekend the bandwidth was maxed out until late today. It seems to me that the limiting factor is the bandwidth now since the servers did very well. When two (or more) new servers come online we will still be limited by the available bandwidth. Then what?? Having these limits in place is not a problem in my view. It is a mechanism to ensure that everyone gets work. Perhaps not as much as you would like from SETI but there are other projects. Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....Boinc.... |
ded1o1 Send message Joined: 29 Sep 07 Posts: 68 Credit: 10,834,919 RAC: 0 |
I don't think so, It took 4 days just to get most people up to the limit. To fill all caches would have doubled the number of units to be sent out which would have maxxed the server out even more. I was wondering about that very thing, it usually only takes about a day and a half for the cricket graphs to show a drop in downloads and a sharp increase in uploads which usually indicates everyone has hit the limit. My guess would be that a lot of people have figured out how to re-schedule around the limit. Visit http://www.mediafire.com/?yyy64lh5953d7 to download GhostDet v1.05 |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Well I had set SETI for NNT but seeing as milkyway has some bad work units, I let some new tasks creep in. The download went fast for a meager .75 day cache that i just had to try a 3 day cache. For once in many weeks the download didnt take hours only a scant few minutes. Cant say if i did get 3 days worth but i got a boat load. [/quote] Old James |
TheFreshPrince a.k.a. BlueTooth76 Send message Joined: 4 Jun 99 Posts: 210 Credit: 10,315,944 RAC: 0 |
I missed something? Hmm, strange... I got about 5150 WU's for my Crunchy and now I get the message "This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress". That's enough for 10 days (a lot of VHARS) so I don't get it why some people don't get any work. When I look at tasks it says I have 13041 tasks, most of them are ghosts (and pending?)... http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=5451977 Rig name: "x6Crunchy" OS: Win 7 x64 MB: Asus M4N98TD EVO CPU: AMD X6 1055T 2.8(1,2v) GPU: 2x Asus GTX560ti Member of: Dutch Power Cows |
Helli_retiered Send message Joined: 15 Dec 99 Posts: 707 Credit: 108,785,585 RAC: 0 |
|
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
|
Dave Stegner Send message Joined: 20 Oct 04 Posts: 540 Credit: 65,583,328 RAC: 27 |
I seem to remember from another thread that the scheduler must also be running. Also, from the server status page: scheduler: Determines what work is going to be sent to/received from requesting clients. and the scheduler shows as not running. Disclaimer: I am not an expert but, reading these threads, I am learning, I think. Someone please correct me if I am wrong. Dave |
Blake Bonkofsky Send message Joined: 29 Dec 99 Posts: 617 Credit: 46,383,149 RAC: 0 |
Uploads can still go through without the scheduler service running, you just can't report them. From what I can tell according to the status page, you should still be able to upload. However, I'm not sure what their procedure for the outages is. They may have a link disabled somewhere preventing the connections. So while the upload server might be up and running, it might not actually be able to do anything. |
platium Send message Joined: 5 Jul 10 Posts: 212 Credit: 262,426 RAC: 0 |
I got some wu's when server started so i stoped to let others get some until sunday i now have two days i think before importing from milkyways project |
Dirk Sadowski Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
Well I had set SETI for NNT but seeing as milkyway has some bad work units, I let some new tasks creep in. The download went fast for a meager .75 day cache that i just had to try a 3 day cache. For once in many weeks the download didnt take hours only a scant few minutes. Cant say if i did get 3 days worth but i got a boat load. AFAIK, MW@h test currently new CPU apps. Why they have no BETA under project - like S@h have? ;-) The MW@h 0.24 cuda23 (GPU app) should work smoothly. |
Lionel Send message Joined: 25 Mar 00 Posts: 680 Credit: 563,640,304 RAC: 597 |
I missed something? didn't get anywhere near 5k wus...just got about 1k for each cruncher...enough to cover the outage (just) and yet i had the cache set to 10/10... ...damn that "limit on taks in progress"...it is annoying particularly after recent events ... would have been nice if they had opened the gates ... L. |
Terror Australis Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 1817 Credit: 262,693,308 RAC: 44 |
...damn that "limit on taks in progress"...it is annoying particularly after recent events ... would have been nice if they had opened the gates ... The Dave Clark 5 :-)) T.A. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.