Message boards :
Technical News :
Lesson #1, Never use the word "fixed" (March 17, 2010)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Apr 00 Posts: 1296 Credit: 45,357,093 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
OzzFan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the hard work and the update. Actually, yes, IBM used the term Fixed Disk or Fixed Drive or even Fixed Disk Drive. Load a copy of FDISK from PC DOS (IBM's version of DOS) or MS-DOS and it will say at the top: Fixed Disk Utility (which is what the F in FDISK stands for). |
![]() Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 ![]() |
Validate errors again with 'hostid=5069275' after the weekly server maintenance. They were ULed during the maintenance and reported after. The same like for two weeks. :-( ____________ [Optimized project applications, for to increase your PC performance (double RAC)!][Overview of abbreviations, which are used often in forum and their meaning.] ![]() |
Dave Mickey Send message Joined: 19 Oct 99 Posts: 178 Credit: 11,122,965 RAC: 0 ![]() |
In one of my previous lives (hw oriented), "fixed disk" was the complement to "removable disk", as in those drives where a cartridge or disk pack containing platters was user-loadable into the disk drive. This allowed such things as one system to support accounting, inventory, etc. applications just depending on which cartridge was loaded. Some even had a fixed platter and a removable, so the OS might be on the fixed, and the app and it's data were on the removable. Of course, you'd have to reboot to swap removeables out. When Winchesters came along, everything became "fixed"...... Dave ![]() |
Wembley Send message Joined: 16 Sep 09 Posts: 429 Credit: 1,844,293 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Good old fashioned removable disk packs .... ah those were the days .... http://www.yourdictionary.com/computer/disk-pack ![]() |
parafa Send message Joined: 22 Jul 07 Posts: 11 Credit: 33,451 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Try this: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=3034 Ageless wrote: "Ah, the infamous error 417. This is a HTTP error. This can possibly be fixed by telling BOINC to use HTTP 1.0 communications only. To do so, make a cc_config.xml file in your BOINC Data directory. Put these lines into it: <cc_config> <options> <http_1_0>1</http_1_0> </options> </cc_config> Open BOINC Manager->Advanced view->Advanced->Read config file. Now try to upload/download." It worked for me, I have just uploaded 2 results. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 3187 Credit: 57,163,290 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Good old fashioned removable disk packs .... ah those were the days .... I once worked at a place that had 8 (numbered 0-7, of course...) disk drives and 4 permanent disk packs, with about 7 temporary packs for various projects - and swappable addresses. I ran one job (I was a system operator - this is back in mainframe times...) where steps 1-7 required one address (say 5) to be a scratch pack, and steps 8-end required address 5 to be the project pack. You'd just pop out the address plug for 5 and put it in the drive (already spinning, of course... these drives took about 1.5 minutes to come up to speed!) that had the project pack. . ![]() Hello, from Albany, CA!... |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I have got three validate errors all 17th March done uploaded either before or after the outage and one both of us have got validate errors. Host ID = 5250323 my new machine this is the fourth validae error from this machine and it is new well bought Jan this year. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 ![]() |
Validate errors again with 'hostid=5069275' after the weekly server maintenance. One of my both validate errors got the 3rd wingman, so it'll be 'deleted' soon and won't be fixed. Your machine [hostid=5250323] with your three validate errors. This validate errors (yours and mine) are server related. If your wingman have the same result, for sure - and not because of your machine. I made a small look at your validate errors and your wingmen have the same results. One of your three validate errors [wuid=582108644] have a wingman also with validate error. BTW. I saw you let run only SSE3 opt. app on your Q8300. I would guess this CPU can also SSSE3, or maybe SSE4.1 . And then you would see a little speed up in calculation. ____________ [Optimized project applications, for to increase your PC performance (double RAC)!][Overview of abbreviations, which are used often in forum and their meaning.] ![]() |
Nate Itkin Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 4 Credit: 1,804,607 RAC: 3 ![]() |
Looks like seti had a dazzling 48 hrs. of uptime before going down again (now approximately 03/19/2010 01:45 UTC) |
Robert Skjöld Send message Joined: 26 Oct 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 380,626 RAC: 0 ![]() |
No work available for the last 2 days now (neither SETI@home, nor Astropulse) |
KB7RZF ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9555 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 2 ![]() |
No work available for the last 2 days now (neither SETI@home, nor Astropulse) Hmm, I got 14: 3/20/2010 4:16:11 PM SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 3/20/2010 4:16:11 PM SETI@home Requesting new tasks 3/20/2010 4:16:16 PM SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 14 new tasks They are all Enhanced, no Astropulse, but still getting work. :-) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
jjwhalen ![]() Send message Joined: 13 Jul 99 Posts: 8 Credit: 923,128 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I've been able to pull a few cuda23 WUs (32 to be exact) in among dozens of "Project has no jobs available" messages. So I think it's just a matter of letting the splitters catch up with demand. I got a couple hundred Seti Beta WUs before that server was taken down. Too bad they're not transferable. Best wishes:) ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 522 Credit: 22,545,639 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Good news...I just received a few work units on a couple of machines. http://boinc.mundayweb.com/teamStats.php?userID=14824 |
OzzFan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 ![]() ![]() |
I got a couple hundred Seti Beta WUs before that server was taken down. Too bad they're not transferable. FYI - for anyone reading that may not know the answer to this: the reason why they're not transferable is because you're not actually BETA testing the workunits, but the application and the backend server processes themselves. Most of the BETA workunits are sent out over and over again, so as to provide a repeatable environment for troubleshooting purposes. It does no good to transfer those workunits to the live project because there's a good chance they've already been crunched scientifically. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 May 02 Posts: 12 Credit: 457,920 RAC: 0 ![]() |
No more beer for you guys. You talk'n to me? |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Oct 01 Posts: 39 Credit: 23,815,960 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Well... it looks like the splitters are down again... Results Ready To Send.... have dropped to single digit numbers. ![]() I DONATE money to SETI@home.... DO YOU? I'm just slowly BOINC'ing along. Hey... ET... you have a sister who likes earthlings? |
PsiKoPatH ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 6 Credit: 618,610 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Finally managed to upload the finished tasks just now and I even got 2 new ones that are running now. I have a question though. I'm running on 2 systems, one windows7, one Mac OSX. The windows7 seems to have less problems connecting than the mac does. I am planning to upgrade to snow leopard this week but there doesn't seem to be a 64bits BOINC manager for osx. I suppose I could just run the 32bits again but it seems a bit of a waste. Anybody know more about this and why the mac is doing worse connecting to the server and getting new tasks? The only other difference I can think of, besides the os and the windows7 being 64bits is that the windows machine is on 24/7, the mac only during the day. Good luck to the seti team fixing whatever is going on the last couple of weeks! We'll just keep trying though I'm not manually updating the project anymore, figuring if everyone does that whenever they get something up and running they will be overwhelmed immediately thx. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Finally managed to upload the finished tasks just now and I even got 2 new ones that are running now. I have a question though. I'm running on 2 systems, one windows7, one Mac OSX. The windows7 seems to have less problems connecting than the mac does. I am planning to upgrade to snow leopard this week but there doesn't seem to be a 64bits BOINC manager for osx. I suppose I could just run the 32bits again but it seems a bit of a waste. Anybody know more about this and why the mac is doing worse connecting to the server and getting new tasks? On my iMac, the manager is running as 32 but boinc itself is a 64-bit app. This is with 6.10.25. ![]() |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.