Remaining time per WU much too less.
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Remaining time per WU much too less.
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
maddin Send message Joined: 16 Jul 01 Posts: 3 Credit: 311 RAC: 0 
|
My work unit takes now ver 7,5 hours at 91% and it says 0:45:05 for "To Completion". 3 hours ago (at 70%) it said 1:07:00 for "To Completion". At the beginning (at 0%) it said 1:25:00 for "To Completion"... and i didn't do anything else during meantime (i.e. full CPU for BOINC) ... this time measurement is totally useless. :-( ID: 2657 ·  |
 Thierry Van Driessche  Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3083 Credit: 150,096 RAC: 0 
|
It is already known from the Beta test phase that the completion time is not accurate. But an improvement has been done. Although, the time needed to complete a full processing will be more accurate when you will process WU's that has been downloaded in a second session. Greetings from Belgium. ID: 2683 · |
|
Morcant Send message Joined: 19 Oct 03 Posts: 27 Credit: 32,551 RAC: 0 
|
> My work unit takes now ver 7,5 hours at 91% and it says 0:45:05 for "To > Completion". 3 hours ago (at 70%) it said 1:07:00 for "To Completion". At the > beginning (at 0%) it said 1:25:00 for "To Completion"... and i didn't do > anything else during meantime (i.e. full CPU for BOINC) ... this time > measurement is totally useless. :-( Maddin, just wondering, what are your benchmarks? It looks like they might be way too high for what your computer can actually do. I don't think your screensaver would make THAT much difference. Cathy ID: 2698 · |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.