Message boards :
Number crunching :
What occuring with my est times??
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Dan Rhodes Send message Joined: 28 Jul 04 Posts: 56 Credit: 865,942 RAC: 0 |
Hey all, I know from looking to much that one of my GPU's takes about 30 mins to complete a work unit and about 60 mins for one of my 4 cores to complete a work unit! Ive come to look this evening and its reporting like nearly 6 hours for a GPU WU and the same for a CPU WU. Ive also noticed that the seconds instead of counting like 9 8 7 6 5 4..... its going from say 5:50 remaing then to 5:21 in the sapce of one second, how have the times become so far out of sync?? D Cheers D |
Gundolf Jahn Send message Joined: 19 Sep 00 Posts: 3184 Credit: 446,358 RAC: 0 |
Very Low Angle Range (VLAR) work unit? Fall back to CPU? Perhaps it's time for a reboot. Gruß, Gundolf Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz) SETI@home classic workunits 3,758 SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours |
Dan Rhodes Send message Joined: 28 Jul 04 Posts: 56 Credit: 865,942 RAC: 0 |
Ah wot its all going crazy tasks are now saying waiting to run and other are running high prioroty ive now got 9 slots open and it looks a right mess! Cheers D |
Odan Send message Joined: 8 May 03 Posts: 91 Credit: 15,331,177 RAC: 0 |
Ah wot its all going crazy tasks are now saying waiting to run and other are running high prioroty ive now got 9 slots open and it looks a right mess! Dan, relax. That is just boinc doing its scheduling thing. Leave it to its own slightly warped devices & it will all come right :) It may look a bit of a mess but it will prioritise as it sees fit. It will start a few then panic as it downloads more pressing tasks & then switch to them. Trust it, it will all come out in the wash. I know from looking to much that one of my GPU's takes about 30 mins to complete a work unit and about 60 mins for one of my 4 cores to complete a work unit! Boinc doesn't really understand the concept of 2 different applications running on the same project on the same machine. When you have 2 apps running with such different execution times on the same data with the GPU much faster than the CPU, it overestimates the time a GPU unit will take to run. As the GPU unit progresses BOINC makes a better & better estimate of remaining execution time resulting in the "To completion" time stepping down by several (or many) seconds at a time. 20 or 30 seconds at a go is quite normal. Don't be fooled by the CUDA units being call 6.08 and the CPU ones 6.03: they are really the same units just branded differently. I've never been sure why this is done, really they could be called anything, it just seems to be a housekeeping nicety. I advise you to put your feet up & eat some more of those nice Cumberland bangers from your profile :) BOINC will look after itself. |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Ok, it's possible you got a VLAR on one of your GPUs. Since they take so long to run on a GPU they've got your completion time all out of whack. The dropping 10 or 15 seconds a second is the running WU correcting it's estimated time. The waiting to run and high priority are also caused by this. Since the completion estimates jumped up so high it thinks you wont be able to finish those shorties within deadline so it is getting them out of the way. Oh, and I only count 6 slots open. those waiting to run are suspended. PS, I wish you silly Englishmen would learn how to write a date correctly. When I first looked I thought you had WU due in August.! :-) PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
Dan Rhodes Send message Joined: 28 Jul 04 Posts: 56 Credit: 865,942 RAC: 0 |
So my PC hasn't gone mad then thats a relief! Will the slot folders remove themselves too when they are no longer needed as there are currently 9 of them in my data directory, im a bugger for wanting to keep my files tidy, unlike my desk and work area lol! Those bangers were excellent, cooked on that barbi in the peak district on a climbing weekend with the guys! Good times, and more to come as soon as it warms up, if anybody wants to join us? D Cheers D |
Odan Send message Joined: 8 May 03 Posts: 91 Credit: 15,331,177 RAC: 0 |
There is nothing quite like a good banger barbied in the wilds - ahhh..... And to perryjay: I resent being called "English". I am Welsh & proud of it :} You may call me British but please not English! Don't get me started on the totally illogical, messed-up way you Americans write dates! |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Ok, who am I talking to? I was teasing Dan about the screenshot he posted. Took me a minute to figure out he was from GB and his days and months are backward. It's almost as bad as all those useless Us you guys stick into every other word! :-) PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
Wembley Send message Joined: 16 Sep 09 Posts: 429 Credit: 1,844,293 RAC: 0 |
Everybody knows you should be using the ISO 8601 date format YYYY-MM-DD :p http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 |
Dan Rhodes Send message Joined: 28 Jul 04 Posts: 56 Credit: 865,942 RAC: 0 |
Nope sorry im sticking to my UK date forma DD-MM-YYYY! D Cheers D |
Odan Send message Joined: 8 May 03 Posts: 91 Credit: 15,331,177 RAC: 0 |
Everybody knows you should be using the ISO 8601 date format YYYY-MM-DD :p Its a great way to start file names if you want an easy way to sort them into a date order - I do actually use it :} Both the ISO & British date orders make sense to me but I have never seen sense in the mixed up US date order. But if using it makes you happy ........ |
Odan Send message Joined: 8 May 03 Posts: 91 Credit: 15,331,177 RAC: 0 |
Ok, who am I talking to? I was teasing Dan about the screenshot he posted. Took me a minute to figure out he was from GB and his days and months are backward. It's almost as bad as all those useless Us you guys stick into every other word! :-) Sorry Perryjay, my bad jumping in. Nothing wrong with you guys over there, how's it go.... oh yes! Some of my best friends are American :} |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Everybody knows you should be using the ISO 8601 date format YYYY-MM-DD :p I never knew YYYY-MM-DD was a standard format. I've used it for years for things like my IRC log names & such. I was using the standard US format MM-DD-YYYY before that. As it puts the month & day in order, but then you loose all order once you get into multi years. I'm just glad that the format for time is the same for everyone. Well maybe not the format with 12 & 24 times, but at least the placement of the values is the same. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0 |
I never knew YYYY-MM-DD was a standard format. I've used it for years for things like my IRC log names & such. I was using the standard US format MM-DD-YYYY before that. As it puts the month & day in order, but then you loose all order once you get into multi years. I'm just glad that the format for time is the same for everyone. Well maybe not the format with 12 & 24 times, but at least the placement of the values is the same. The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.