留言板 :
Number crunching :
Estimated GFLOPS: nice coincidence
留言板合理
| 作者 | 消息 |
|---|---|
skildude 发送消息 已加入:4 Oct 00 贴子:9541 积分:50,759,529 近期平均积分:60
|
thats an estimated max GFLOPs. you'll end up with about 10% of your estimate which it seems you are doing with your cards In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
|
IFRS 发送消息 已加入:21 May 99 贴子:1736 积分:259,180,282 近期平均积分:0
|
Well I sure many people will disagreed, but in my observations I just found a very handy coincidence when estimating a CUDA card RAC. That will work only on old BOINC clients, like 6.6.20, wich I use on most of my machines. At the moment, I ran this CUDA cards, wich have pretty much this RAC: 2 9600GT cards, that have an estimated 37GFlops and have a RAC of 3.7k 3 GTS 250 cards, that have an estimated 86GFlops and have a RAC of 8.6k One GTX 295 (until tomorrow hehehe) card, that have an estimated 2x125 GFlops, and a RAC of 25k Any one else can confirm this with other cards? Its a nice coincidence, and maybe it can be used to have a close estimated RAC on new/unknown CUDA cards. |
©2020 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.