Estimated GFLOPS: nice coincidence

留言板 : Number crunching : Estimated GFLOPS: nice coincidence
留言板合理

To post messages, you must log in.

作者消息
Profile skildude
Avatar

发送消息
已加入:4 Oct 00
贴子:9541
积分:50,759,529
近期平均积分:60
Yemen
消息 953202 - 发表于:8 Dec 2009, 13:41:08 UTC - 回复消息 953196.  

thats an estimated max GFLOPs. you'll end up with about 10% of your estimate which it seems you are doing with your cards


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 953202 · 举报违规帖子
IFRS
志愿者测试人员
Avatar

发送消息
已加入:21 May 99
贴子:1736
积分:259,180,282
近期平均积分:0
United States
消息 953196 - 发表于:8 Dec 2009, 11:33:31 UTC

Well I sure many people will disagreed, but in my observations I just found a very handy coincidence when estimating a CUDA card RAC. That will work only on old BOINC clients, like 6.6.20, wich I use on most of my machines.

At the moment, I ran this CUDA cards, wich have pretty much this RAC:

2 9600GT cards, that have an estimated 37GFlops and have a RAC of 3.7k
3 GTS 250 cards, that have an estimated 86GFlops and have a RAC of 8.6k
One GTX 295 (until tomorrow hehehe) card, that have an estimated 2x125 GFlops, and a RAC of 25k

Any one else can confirm this with other cards?
Its a nice coincidence, and maybe it can be used to have a close estimated RAC on new/unknown CUDA cards.
ID: 953196 · 举报违规帖子

留言板 : Number crunching : Estimated GFLOPS: nice coincidence


 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.