nVIDIA driver 191.07 released.

Message boards : Number crunching : nVIDIA driver 191.07 released.
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile 52 Aces
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 02
Posts: 497
Credit: 14,261,068
RAC: 67
United States
Message 937934 - Posted: 6 Oct 2009, 10:57:35 UTC

Uploaded Oct 5 (codesigned Oct 1). The fix list (below) looks minor.

I installed, rebooted, and back to crunching no problems, no perf change either way.

nVIDIA DL site is here.

-------------------------------

New in Version 191.07

    •Adds support for OpenGL 3.2 for GeForce 8, 9, 100, and 200-series GPUs and ION GPUs.
    •Accelerates performance in several gaming applications. The following are examples of improvements measured with version 191.07 drivers vs. version 190.62 drivers (results will vary depending on your GPU, system configuration, and game settings):

      â—¦Up to 12% performance increase in ARMA 2
      â—¦Up to 8% performance increase in Batman: Arkham Asylum with GPU PhysX enabled
      â—¦Up to 50% performance increase in Call of Juarez: Blood in Bound with SLI enabled
      â—¦Up to 14% performance increase in Fallout 3 (indoor scenes) with antialiasing enabled
      â—¦Up to 10% performance increase in Far Cry 2 (DX9 version) with antialiasing enabled
      â—¦Up to 34% performance increase in Prototype with antialiasing enabled


    •Adds SLI support for Aion, Darkfall, Dawn of Magic 2: Time of Shadows, Dreamkiller, Fuel, Majesty 2: The Fantasy Kingdom Sim, Need for Speed: Shift and more.
    •Includes numerous bug fixes, including the following key fix (additional bug fixes can be found in the release notes on the documentation tab): For graphics cards supporting multiple clock states, 3D clocks correctly return to 2D clocks after exiting a 3D application

ID: 937934 · Report as offensive
Profile Pilot
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 938058 - Posted: 7 Oct 2009, 4:10:26 UTC - in response to Message 937934.  

Unfortunately this upgrade killed CPUID ability to monitor CUDA temps.
Bummer!!!
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.
ID: 938058 · Report as offensive
Profile X-Files 27
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 104
Credit: 111,191,433
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 938081 - Posted: 7 Oct 2009, 7:48:23 UTC - in response to Message 938058.  

Unfortunately this upgrade killed CPUID ability to monitor CUDA temps.
Bummer!!!


run registry and look for all instances of RmThermalProviderNum and RmThermalProviderInfo and delete them.
ID: 938081 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 938084 - Posted: 7 Oct 2009, 8:17:44 UTC - in response to Message 938081.  

Hi, doesn't seem a good idea to mix 2, totally different GPU's, on 1 host.
Has to be possible, but IMHO, it's asking for trouble (instabillity)

How does BOINC react to that, in terms of workfetch and flow?
Maybe too early to tell?


ID: 938084 · Report as offensive
spitfire_mk_2
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Apr 00
Posts: 563
Credit: 27,306,885
RAC: 0
United States
Message 938149 - Posted: 7 Oct 2009, 16:49:51 UTC - in response to Message 938084.  

Hi, doesn't seem a good idea to mix 2, totally different GPU's, on 1 host.
Has to be possible, but IMHO, it's asking for trouble (instabillity)

Instability from 2 different GPU means you have badly made OS.
ID: 938149 · Report as offensive
FiveHamlet
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Oct 99
Posts: 783
Credit: 32,638,578
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 938167 - Posted: 7 Oct 2009, 19:06:20 UTC

This updated driver still does not fix the fact that if you have 2 GTX295's,
in a Vista os rig that only 3 GPU's are seen.
Still Waiting on Nvidia to fix it.

Dave
ID: 938167 · Report as offensive
Profile Pilot
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 938170 - Posted: 7 Oct 2009, 19:22:42 UTC - in response to Message 938081.  

Unfortunately this upgrade killed CPUID ability to monitor CUDA temps.
Bummer!!!


run registry and look for all instances of RmThermalProviderNum and RmThermalProviderInfo and delete them.

Big thanks, that did the trick:)
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.
ID: 938170 · Report as offensive
Profile Dirk Sadowski
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 938286 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 7:05:08 UTC


And it's worth to go from 190.x to 191.x if only CUDA crunching?

Speed up?

ID: 938286 · Report as offensive
Profile mr.kjellen
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 01
Posts: 195
Credit: 71,324,196
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 938289 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 7:12:13 UTC

My i7 with two different GPUs (8800GTS & 9800+) just froze up with 191.07. I went back to driver 190.38, no such issues since.

/Anton
ID: 938289 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51588
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 938290 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 7:17:28 UTC - in response to Message 938286.  


And it's worth to go from 190.x to 191.x if only CUDA crunching?

Speed up?

I doubt there would be any speedup for Cuda crunching, as I do not see any new DLL's above 2.3 being offered at the moment.
"Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."

ID: 938290 · Report as offensive
Profile Pilot
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 938293 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 7:20:06 UTC - in response to Message 938290.  


And it's worth to go from 190.x to 191.x if only CUDA crunching?

Speed up?

I doubt there would be any speedup for Cuda crunching, as I do not see any new DLL's above 2.3 being offered at the moment.

I don't see any mesurable speed up as yet, but other task running at the same time do seem to be a bit smoother.
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.
ID: 938293 · Report as offensive
Profile Pilot
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 938346 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 15:15:52 UTC - in response to Message 938293.  
Last modified: 8 Oct 2009, 15:18:05 UTC

I have had a screw up here with these drivers.
A job got hung or stoped showing progress at about 60% done and stayed that way for about 2 hours untill I aborted it.
Then it started haveing Comp errors on all the rest of the jobs untill I stopped BOINC and rebooted my system.
The problems were for only the CUDA jobs as the rest of the WU ran normally during this time.
So far all is back to normal now.
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.
ID: 938346 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51588
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 938353 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 15:35:23 UTC

Think I'll stay with 190.62 until this gets sorted....
"Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."

ID: 938353 · Report as offensive
Profile Dirk Sadowski
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 938382 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 17:54:59 UTC


@ Pilot

Maybe this new driver version isn't very well for your new OS (Win7) ?


If I wouldn't have speed up with the new 191.07 , I will stay with 190.38 , it work fine with WinXP Home.

ID: 938382 · Report as offensive
Profile Dirk Sadowski
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 938383 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 17:58:51 UTC


AFAIK, 190.62 is well for WinVista.. so I can stay with 190.38 .. ;-)
ID: 938383 · Report as offensive
Profile Pilot
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 938387 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 18:15:49 UTC - in response to Message 938382.  


@ Pilot

Maybe this new driver version isn't very well for your new OS (Win7) ?


If I wouldn't have speed up with the new 191.07 , I will stay with 190.38 , it work fine with WinXP Home.

Before the Download and update I checked and it said that it was good for Windows 7. However I am still running RC which could have a funny or two in it.
If it hangs again, or starts giving massive errors, I will back down to earlier version of the drivers.
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.
ID: 938387 · Report as offensive
Profile Dirk Sadowski
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 938426 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 20:34:49 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2009, 20:37:40 UTC


I meant also - maybe it's because of..

190.38 came out and then they saw that it's not well for WinVista, then they published 190.62 .

Maybe soon they will publish > 191.07 which will work better with Win7 ..


All AFAIK and IIRC.. :-)

ID: 938426 · Report as offensive
CryptokiD
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Dec 00
Posts: 150
Credit: 3,216,632
RAC: 0
United States
Message 940577 - Posted: 16 Oct 2009, 22:54:08 UTC

191.07 caused my 9500gt to slow wayyyy down. cuda work units took about 10 times longer then when i was using the 190.62 drivers.

i gave the new drivers about 24 hours to see if things would fix themselves , but they had not so i uninstalled them and went back to the 190.62's and my cuda workunit time is back where it suppose to be.
ID: 940577 · Report as offensive
Nick

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 09
Posts: 81
Credit: 112,909
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 940604 - Posted: 16 Oct 2009, 23:44:26 UTC - in response to Message 937934.  

I got 191.07 for my GTS250 but the nvidia site only has up to 186.81 for my mobile-based 9600M GS.

Stange...

ID: 940604 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,537,079
RAC: 4
United Kingdom
Message 940608 - Posted: 17 Oct 2009, 0:02:53 UTC - in response to Message 940604.  
Last modified: 17 Oct 2009, 0:05:07 UTC

I got 191.07 for my GTS250 but the nvidia site only has up to 186.81 for my mobile-based 9600M GS.

Stange...


Beta 190.38 Notebook drivers are available in the second post in this thread:

CUDA Toolkit and SDK 2.3 released

Been using 190.38 for the last couple of weeks, managed to get my under spec GPU (for Seti) crunching on Collatz with it,
and managed to get Collatz to lower their Server's Cuda memory requirements down to 126Mb, so no app_info required anymore. :)

Claggy
ID: 940608 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : nVIDIA driver 191.07 released.


 
©2026 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.