Message boards :
Number crunching :
losing ground
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
BobMiller Send message Joined: 24 Jul 08 Posts: 32 Credit: 11,041,077 RAC: 129
|
With new WU assignments I have gone from over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling. As a result I'm about to pull the plug on my efforts for SETI. I guess I'll leave it to the megawu folks to do the work. |
|
Aurora Borealis Send message Joined: 14 Jan 01 Posts: 3075 Credit: 5,631,463 RAC: 0
|
With new WU assignments I have gone from over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling. If credits is all that important to you then I wish farewell and good luck in your future endeavors. I'm sure you can find some other hobby/project that will give you just as worthless a validation. You could have just left without saying a word. For the majority of Seti denizens credits may be fun, but are very much secondary to the goals of the project. |
|
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0
|
With new WU assignments I have gone from over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling. He has an important point, though. The collection of credits is a true and worthy cause. We know they have value because they can be exchanged for all kinds of valuable...... Oh, they can't be exchanged for anything, can they? That's very different. Nevermind. -- Emily Litella |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0
|
Interesting... since the chirp_resolution was decreased, my Pentium M needs on average about 20sec less per credit. One of us must be doing something wrong.
|
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0
|
|
DPRGI - Luivul Send message Joined: 24 Jan 03 Posts: 17 Credit: 20,639,801 RAC: 0
|
With new WU assignments I have gone from over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling. Is true the goal of the project isn't pure credit collection but when i start the project was encouraged to crunch the major number of WU (rank and RAC statistics, teams, competitions etc). Today the project have enough crunchers and prestige to say "we don't need your WU is better if you go away". If this is the new spirit of the project I was very sad. |
|
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0
|
With new WU assignments I have gone from over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling. If a person's name doesn't say "administrator" or "project scientist" that means they're just participants. My statements do not represent SETI@Home or the Regents of the University of California. Most of the posts are from crunchers just like you. The original poster is unhappy because his credit isn't the same as it was. We know that credit varies, and we know it varies for everyone. We know that dips in credit are followed by jumps. ... and we know that all of our boats rise and fall on the same tide. |
DPRGI - Luivul Send message Joined: 24 Jan 03 Posts: 17 Credit: 20,639,801 RAC: 0
|
I permit to say this because is not the first time i hear it. I now the problems of the project (bandwith, data from arecibo, databases etc) but when hear after years of crunching I'm sure you can find some other hobby/project that will give you just as worthless a validation my blood temperature rise. I believe in this project and crunch for this reason. |
|
Aurora Borealis Send message Joined: 14 Jan 01 Posts: 3075 Credit: 5,631,463 RAC: 0
|
I permit to say this because is not the first time i hear it. I now the problems of the project (bandwith, data from arecibo, databases etc) but when hear after years of crunching Do keep an eye on you blood pressure, there is no reason to get agitated. This 'volunteer' obviously thinks that the credit received is more important then the project goals. The same type of sentiment is being expressed at the moment at Milkyway by credit hounds who aren't happy that the dev's have made an adjustment to lower the credits to be more in line with other projects. Personally, I just joined that project for which I had a mild interest now that it has stopped the over inflated credit awards. Boinc V7.2.42 Win7 i5 3.33G 4GB, GTX470 |
OzzFan ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15692 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28
|
With new WU assignments I have gone from over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling. To be honest, I'm lost on your numbers. When you made this post, your RAC has been about the same of 68. You mention "over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling"... so I'm rather confused. If you did have a RAC as high as 3000 to less than 2500 and falling, it would take you a long time to drop down to a mere 68 that you have now (longer than the few hours it's been since you've posted your message). I'm really confused as to what's frustrating you. |
|
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0
|
I permit to say this because is not the first time i hear it. I now the problems of the project (bandwith, data from arecibo, databases etc) but when hear after years of crunching [edit]Actually, you're agreeing with Aurora Borealis -- you say you believe in the project, and you aren't here just for the credit. I'm not either.[/edit] Strictly for the sake of argument, let's say Aurora Borealis is completely wrong. Note that under his name, it says "Volunteer Tester" -- that means he participates in the SETI@Home Beta or BOINC Alpha project. Compare that to Matt Lebofsky or Eric Korpela. Under their names you'll see things like "Project Administrator" and "Project Developer" and "Project Scientist" -- what they say is official. They have an official role, and draw a paycheck. Don't take what my friend Aurora Borealis says as representing policy. In fact, don't take what I say as official in any capacity either. I'm just another cruncher, just like Aurora Borealis, and just like you. ... and we're all just passing time, watching the rise and fall of credits, kind of like people watch the waves at the beach -- just without the waves, or the beer, or the pretty girl. -- Ned |
|
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13
|
My RAC has been steadily falling since the AP crisis a few months ago. I think the APs were exaggerating my actual RAC, and since they have been mostly gone (rather, I haven't been able to pick many up at all), the MB-only diet is still working on leveling out. It has been pointed out before that RAC goes up quickly, but comes down slowly. I have a few inactive/retired crunchers that have not seen a WU in over two years but still have 0.01 for a RAC. I know that number is essentially zero, but it's..not. I went from an all-time high of 6660.38 for a RAC in the peak of the AP domination era using r112 on four rigs down to a current level of 3486. I'm fairly confident my real RAC in perfect conditions should be very near where it currently is. Point is, credits are basically meaningless. They are non-monetary, and serve no other purpose than to see how you compare to others. Sure, with many millions of cobblestones (I think..) you can buy an US$10 toaster, but is it really worth it? No. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
52 Aces Send message Joined: 7 Jan 02 Posts: 497 Credit: 14,261,068 RAC: 67
|
It has been pointed out before that RAC goes up quickly, but comes down slowly. ... but no one protests when RAC mysteriously goes up ;-) I think for many (nay, most), the Credits & RAC are simply a fun way to keep private score, whether they admit it or not :-) Seti is effectively able to print money for scoring crunchers, so as long as there is a credible baseline (the cobblestone gold standard or whichever) then like any good economy, the masses have faith. True, there is no greenstamp trade value .... but not to say that bridge couldn't be crossed someday (similar to WOW and SL), probably under the Boinc umbrella. How many folks would happily trade off from their Credit Scores: -- 500,000 credits to name a star (& tie the registry into Google sky so people can see their star) -- or 2 million credits for a limited edition annual S@H jacket patch or personalized autographed team photo? -- Or 10 million for VIP grandstand seats for a shuttle launch or lunch with Paul Allen? Don't have 10 million, Nooooooooooooo problem, you can buy up previously donated back credits from the Seti treasury thus assisting the Donation Fund. Economy software already exists, see LindenLabs and others. Boinc then becomes like MechanicalTurk (but successful). ... and back to the original topic, hang in there BOB MILLER ! |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57
|
Just like the stock market. Somedays shes up and some days shes down. This is with all of my machines working steady & even adding 2 around the 28th when it's still falling. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
|
S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl Send message Joined: 7 Oct 01 Posts: 385 Credit: 50,200,038 RAC: 0
|
The credit drop goes for everyone here.. me also.., but what I don't understand is that you say your production has dropped.. your production seems quite OK: and your RAC (red one) seems more or less stable? The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS |
|
Fulvio Cavalli Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 1736 Credit: 259,180,282 RAC: 0
|
My RAC was going down almost 9k like two weeks ago, and now its going back to normal. But it was all on pending credits, so I guess its all a validation issue. Sometimes it goes to your RAC, sometimes it goes to your pending, but its all good crunched numbers. Just in case, im happy to say I add a Q9550/GTS250 last month, and a new i7/GTS250 today to my farm :) Both 24/7, so a big YAY to my eletricity bills. I guess the numbers will keep increasing.... |
|
woodenboatguy Send message Joined: 10 Nov 00 Posts: 368 Credit: 3,969,364 RAC: 0
|
My RAC has fallen off by half from over 6000 to now around 2800. I've had it.... Oh, wait. It's my machines that are what's been off lately. I joined many moons ago because searching for ET sounded like fun. It has been. Credits are interesting but only so much so as to see what's been happening. The CUDA thing motivated me to go out and buy a suped-up video card just for the fun of seeing what it would accomplish for instance. Bottom line was that it did, and that was about as interesting as it got (wellll, the graphics improvement did kinda make me wish I'd been a little less stingy previously). Bottom line is that credits should be a distant second in your reasons for wanting doing this. At least it is for me. Regards, |
|
woodenboatguy Send message Joined: 10 Nov 00 Posts: 368 Credit: 3,969,364 RAC: 0
|
HAL9000 - if it weren't for the actual numbers up the side of the graph yours and mine would look almost identical, nearly to the very date. The only thing constant? Change. Regards, |
Carlos Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 31986 Credit: 57,275,487 RAC: 157
|
Well I can complain too. My RAC was up in the 70-80,000 range a couple of years ago. I'm down to almost at 10% of that now. But in my case it's mainly an economic problem. My buisness is building houses. Need I say more? So most of my farm dormant while I try to save on the power bill.
|
LiliKrist Send message Joined: 12 Aug 09 Posts: 333 Credit: 143,167 RAC: 0
|
It has been pointed out before that RAC goes up quickly, but comes down slowly. Homo sapien... That is us... Heehhh... I don't care about credits! I only care how to make my computer go fast on crunching wu. So what has been done and what is being done by Dr. David P. Anderson + Dan Werthimer + Dr. Eric Korpela + Jeff Cobb + Robert Bankay + Matt Lebofsky + Dr. Kevin Douglas + Josh Von Korff is not useless. Teamwork...teamwork...all my masters...please... |
©2026 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.