CUDA RT2.3 available - upgrade highly recommended

Author	Message
Raistmer Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121	Message 920806 - Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 22:17:59 UTC Last modified: 23 Jul 2009, 22:18:27 UTC For all CUDA crunchers. Please, upgrade your video drivers to latest WHQL available and CUDA RT DLLs to CUDA RT 2.3. This could give ~30% (more or less - depending from AR of task) speedup for free ;) ID: 920806 ·

Dirk Sadowski Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5	Message 920809 - Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 22:24:01 UTC Last modified: 23 Jul 2009, 22:25:31 UTC Maybe an URL for how-to-do and where to find? ;-) 'Latest nVIDIA_driver and CUDA_Version' ID: 920809 ·

Raistmer Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121	Message 920813 - Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 22:29:18 UTC - in response to Message 920809. Last modified: 23 Jul 2009, 22:30:50 UTC Ok, url: http://lunatics.kwsn.net/index.php?module=Downloads;sa=dlview;id=208 (though I think "Downloads" section is very known place for all Lunatics adepts ;D ) ID: 920813 ·

Dirk Sadowski Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5	Message 920821 - Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 22:44:18 UTC But.. the CUDA_V2.3 file found place in the DL area - after my thread .. ;-D ID: 920821 ·

Steve Dodd Send message Joined: 29 May 99 Posts: 23 Credit: 8,695,373 RAC: 1	Message 920847 - Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 23:45:47 UTC Warning - newest NVidia drivers cause problems when crunching GPUGRID wus under Windows XP 32-bit. If your active on that project, don't upgrade right now. ID: 920847 ·

popandbob Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Mar 05 Posts: 551 Credit: 4,673,015 RAC: 0	Message 920855 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 0:09:42 UTC I'm seeing plenty more than a 30% increase... Currently getting 9.9 credits per minute :) -10.5 minutes per 92.6 credit task -2.5 minutes per 29.08 credit task Which equals 14000 RAC (approx) on a single gtx260 core 216 (highly OC'ed) Which is VERY impressive! Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957 Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957 ID: 920855 ·

zpm Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Apr 08 Posts: 284 Credit: 1,659,024 RAC: 0	Message 920857 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 0:16:26 UTC - in response to Message 920855. Last modified: 24 Jul 2009, 0:16:36 UTC a warning about a experience i had with driver 190.38 on a windows xp computer.. my mother plays pogo games and i had update the driver and it was doing something crazy in-conjunction with java, java was up to date and i rolled the driver back and this problem stopped; so a forewarning on that front... I recommend Secunia PSI: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/ Go Georgia Tech. ID: 920857 ·

TCP JESUS Send message Joined: 19 Jan 03 Posts: 205 Credit: 1,248,845 RAC: 0	Message 920869 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 0:50:47 UTC - in response to Message 920855. I'm seeing plenty more than a 30% increase... Currently getting 9.9 credits per minute :) -10.5 minutes per 92.6 credit task -2.5 minutes per 29.08 credit task Which equals 14000 RAC (approx) on a single gtx260 core 216 (highly OC'ed) Which is VERY impressive! What are you running your card at for mem/GPU/shader speeds ? What does BOINC estimate your card at in GFLOPS ? I am TCP JESUS...The Carpenter Phenom Jesus....and *HAMMERING* is what I do best! formerly known as...MC Hammer. ID: 920869 ·

Zeus Fab3r Send message Joined: 17 Jan 01 Posts: 649 Credit: 275,335,635 RAC: 597	Message 920871 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 0:53:15 UTC Last modified: 24 Jul 2009, 0:58:31 UTC Yes that's a VERY nice boost, but should I be voried about this Result? Strange is that they are in Completed, waiting for validation state, not invalid ?!Ã‚Â¿Ã‚Â¡ Who the hell is General Failure and why is he reading my harddisk?Â¿ ID: 920871 ·

zpm Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Apr 08 Posts: 284 Credit: 1,659,024 RAC: 0	Message 920872 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 0:54:44 UTC - in response to Message 920871. Last modified: 24 Jul 2009, 0:56:16 UTC Yes that's a VERY nice boost, but should I be voried about this Result? Strange is that they are in Completed, waiting for validation state, not invalid ?!Ã‚Â¿Ã‚Â¡ ugh; YES!!!!! does more than one wu do it? i'll guess yes to my own question and seek further help is my answer to you. ID: 920872 ·

BigDaddyDave Send message Joined: 8 Oct 00 Posts: 67 Credit: 20,337,995 RAC: 15	Message 920876 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 1:05:01 UTC - in response to Message 920806. Thanks Raistmer will do! ID: 920876 ·

popandbob Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Mar 05 Posts: 551 Credit: 4,673,015 RAC: 0	Message 920880 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 1:08:58 UTC - in response to Message 920869. What are you running your card at for mem/GPU/shader speeds ? What does BOINC estimate your card at in GFLOPS ? Estimated @ 117 GFLOPS Core/shader/memory 702/1512/1000 It would be 702/1550/1100 if evga precision was working... Zeus, As long as the result validates it shouldn't be an issue but something is causing memory usage problems. Bob Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957 Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957 ID: 920880 ·

TCP JESUS Send message Joined: 19 Jan 03 Posts: 205 Credit: 1,248,845 RAC: 0	Message 920884 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 1:16:38 UTC I run (3) BFG OC MaxCore 216 GTX 260 cards @ Core/shader/memory - 675/1600/1100 ...and a static 75% Fan setting. CUDA device: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 19038, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 123GFLOPS) CUDA device: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 19038, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 123GFLOPS) CUDA device: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 19038, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 123GFLOPS) I am not sure if I am seeing quite the improvements that you are though, although I could be wrong, as I can't see completed tasks to get more info. I am TCP JESUS...The Carpenter Phenom Jesus....and *HAMMERING* is what I do best! formerly known as...MC Hammer. ID: 920884 ·

popandbob Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Mar 05 Posts: 551 Credit: 4,673,015 RAC: 0	Message 920887 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 1:25:31 UTC looking at your pending tasks your seeing about double the time I am? unless those weren't done as 2.3's? Bob Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957 Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957 ID: 920887 ·

TCP JESUS Send message Joined: 19 Jan 03 Posts: 205 Credit: 1,248,845 RAC: 0	Message 920889 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 1:29:49 UTC I did the driver update earlier today. I just copied over the 2 x dll files a few minutes ago, then rebooted. Should hopefully see better results soon, as I can finally see results now that the function was re-enabled. I am TCP JESUS...The Carpenter Phenom Jesus....and *HAMMERING* is what I do best! formerly known as...MC Hammer. ID: 920889 ·

TCP JESUS Send message Joined: 19 Jan 03 Posts: 205 Credit: 1,248,845 RAC: 0	Message 920897 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 1:52:10 UTC HOLLY CRAP ! .....the 'Pending' are starting to roll in.... 50% +++ increase in performance. 99 sec for a 126 point WU...not too shabby considering I was 200-300 secs previously. I am TCP JESUS...The Carpenter Phenom Jesus....and *HAMMERING* is what I do best! formerly known as...MC Hammer. ID: 920897 ·

popandbob Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Mar 05 Posts: 551 Credit: 4,673,015 RAC: 0	Message 921060 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 16:00:46 UTC Thats just the CPU time... Check out the difference in elapsed time (wall clock) It is 1.8x-2x faster :) Bob Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957 Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957 ID: 921060 ·

Leopoldo Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Aug 99 Posts: 102 Credit: 3,051,091 RAC: 0	Message 921072 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 17:08:18 UTC - in response to Message 920806. Last modified: 24 Jul 2009, 17:12:42 UTC For all CUDA crunchers. Please, upgrade your video drivers to latest WHQL available and CUDA RT DLLs to CUDA RT 2.3. This could give ~30% (more or less - depending from AR of task) speedup for free ;) Many thanks, Raistmer! 8800 Ultra - common workunit falls from 14 min to 9 min ;) To keep DCF at 1.0, "flops" had been changed accordingly :) ___________ WBW, Leonid ID: 921072 ·

Fred J. Verster Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Apr 04 Posts: 3252 Credit: 31,903,643 RAC: 0	Message 921679 - Posted: 27 Jul 2009, 15:20:18 UTC - in response to Message 921072. Hey, after I installed 190.38, all went fine, but when replacing ' old' CUDART & CUFFT.dll for the 2.3 CUDA version, BOINC can' t srat. "client hangs . . .". Have to shut it down manually. How do I get the ' old' cudart & cufft.dll's back? Maybe I' m gettin tooo old?! ;-) ID: 921679 ·

SmartWombat Send message Joined: 9 Jan 04 Posts: 64 Credit: 6,577,011 RAC: 0	Message 921832 - Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 1:17:06 UTC - in response to Message 921679. Well thanks for the heads-up on that. But having downloaded and unzipped Cuda2.3rt_fft_dlls.7z What do I do with them? Just copy them to the program files\BOINC folder ? PAul [IMG][/IMG] ID: 921832 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.