Post your BOINC Startup 'CUDA' Info


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Post your BOINC Startup 'CUDA' Info
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 12 · Next

AuthorMessage
Stuart Gibson

Send message
Joined: 28 May 99
Posts: 31
Credit: 12,112,497
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 938296 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 7:55:51 UTC

08/10/2009 08:12:12 CUDA device: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ (driver version 19107, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 94GFLOPS)

Bumped up my overclock to 828/2052/1203.
ID: 938296 · Report as offensive
Agustin Morillas Lopez

Send message
Joined: 14 Dec 01
Posts: 2
Credit: 2,719,154
RAC: 0
Spain
Message 938299 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 9:05:24 UTC

08/10/2009 0:36:56 NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 19107, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 96GFLOPS)
ID: 938299 · Report as offensive
Profile Careface

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 03
Posts: 128
Credit: 16,561,684
RAC: 0
New Zealand
Message 938300 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 9:10:39 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2009, 9:15:50 UTC

NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 19062, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 114GFLOPS)

700/1475/1000

Does increasing mem clocks actually affect crunch times overly? Looks like I've reached the top for my card on shaders :( anything over about 1480 starts to get major artifacts in games/stress tests.. so I'm not willing to run SETI for fear of getting WU errors
ID: 938300 · Report as offensive
woodenboatguy

Send message
Joined: 10 Nov 00
Posts: 368
Credit: 3,969,364
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 938302 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 10:05:56 UTC

NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce 9800 GX2 (driver version 18585, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 69GFLOPS)
NVIDIA GPU 1: GeForce 9800 GX2 (driver version 18585, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 69GFLOPS)

For some reason the second machine doesn't show the GPU info in the messages tab but does show itself computing on it. It's also a dual but I've never been able to get BOINC to use the second of the two GPUs.

Regards,
ID: 938302 · Report as offensive
David L. Fretz

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 99
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,265,401
RAC: 0
United States
Message 938303 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 10:22:51 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2009, 10:42:39 UTC

CUDA device: GeForce GTX 275 (driver version 19107, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 130GFLOPS) EVGA GTX 275 FTW Factory OC'd 713mhz/1260/1512

You need to unset SLI to get both cards to work and show up independantly.
ID: 938303 · Report as offensive
Stuart Gibson

Send message
Joined: 28 May 99
Posts: 31
Credit: 12,112,497
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 938304 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 10:24:56 UTC - in response to Message 938296.  

08/10/2009 08:12:12 CUDA device: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ (driver version 19107, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 94GFLOPS)

Bumped up my overclock to 828/2052/1203.


Hehehehehe...

Clocks now at 850/2052/1311.

I get computation errors with the shader clock at 2100 so I think I've reached the limit on them.
1.Q9650@4.05GHz,Rampage Formula,4Gb OCZ Blade,2x 9800GTX+
2.Q9650@4.05GHz,P5Q Deluxe,4Gb Kingston HyperX,9800GTX+
3.Q6600@3.2GHz,P5E-VM SE,4Gb Kingston HyperX,GTS 250
ID: 938304 · Report as offensive
Wembley
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Sep 09
Posts: 429
Credit: 1,844,293
RAC: 0
United States
Message 938305 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 10:26:00 UTC - in response to Message 916840.  
Last modified: 8 Oct 2009, 10:29:02 UTC

The others can't "see" the card since they are running headless.
(anybody know the work around for that?) Sorry if there are duplicates - nothing OC.


How to make a Dummy VGA Dongle:
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=86507
ID: 938305 · Report as offensive
Wembley
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Sep 09
Posts: 429
Credit: 1,844,293
RAC: 0
United States
Message 938306 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 10:34:59 UTC - in response to Message 938305.  

eVga card, w/ stock clock:
NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce 9500 GT (driver version 19062, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 16GFLOPS)

same card overclocked: (core 700 / mem 576 / shader 1700)
NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce 9500 GT (driver version 19062, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 19GFLOPS)
ID: 938306 · Report as offensive
Profile 52 Aces
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 02
Posts: 497
Credit: 14,261,068
RAC: 67
United States
Message 938308 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 11:25:38 UTC - in response to Message 938306.  

Who is actually in need / using this info?

If still the case, can't it be gotten more efficiently with a query directly to mork & jocelyn? And if you're going that far, might as well query a day's worth of results to build up the ultimate Seti Performance Pivot Table of CPU Class, CPU Rate, WU angle, GPU type, GPU quantity, GPU ram, OS, 32/64, etc, etc, cpu/gpu time taken, & logical time threshold buckets to detect overclocking of CPU & GPU.

ID: 938308 · Report as offensive
Profile Emil Teofanov

Send message
Joined: 8 Oct 99
Posts: 9
Credit: 819,066
RAC: 0
Bulgaria
Message 938336 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 14:41:06 UTC

CUDA device: GeForce 9800 GT (Shitty nVidia card with the NVLDDMKM BUG - can't use for gaming, but it's OK for SETI)
(driver version 19038, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 74 GFLOPS)

PCIe interface.

Overclocked to:
GPU core clock - 738 MHz
GPU shader domain - 1836 MHz
GPU memory clock - 972 MHz

Cogito Ergo Sum
ID: 938336 · Report as offensive
Wandering Willie
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 136
Credit: 2,127,073
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 938412 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 19:42:55 UTC

Crunching MB 6.08.

NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce 8300 GS (driver version 18585, compute capability 1.1, 256MB, est. 3GFLOPS) also runs with driver version 19062.

Michael.
ID: 938412 · Report as offensive
Profile Tilmitt

Send message
Joined: 31 Oct 02
Posts: 9
Credit: 9,769,912
RAC: 0
Japan
Message 938451 - Posted: 8 Oct 2009, 22:15:22 UTC - in response to Message 938412.  

NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 275 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 120GFLOPS)
NVIDIA GPU 1: GeForce 8800 GT (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 64GFLOPS)
ID: 938451 · Report as offensive
Profile Hellsheep
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 08
Posts: 428
Credit: 784,780
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 938665 - Posted: 9 Oct 2009, 17:38:07 UTC

Here is mine:

10/10/2009 2:39:55 AM NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 275 (driver version 19062, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 125GFLOPS)


Non-overclocked, is this somewhat decent or?
ID: 938665 · Report as offensive
Profile j mercer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 12,323,733
RAC: 1
United States
Message 938770 - Posted: 9 Oct 2009, 22:39:04 UTC

10/9/2009 3:38:09 PM - NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 280M (driver version 19038, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 66GFLOPS)
...
ID: 938770 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 938779 - Posted: 9 Oct 2009, 23:16:57 UTC - in response to Message 938770.  
Last modified: 9 Oct 2009, 23:53:56 UTC

Hi, I have a 9800GTX, est. 85 GFLOPS, compute capability 1.1. driver 190.32(?) 512MB, CUDA 2.3 DLL's and a 8500GT 4 GFLOPS, which I don't use, at this moment for CUDA.
But I use a LT, the GPU is on a 'dedicated cruncher' with QX9650 @ 3.5 GHz.
Sometimes use it for a game. If the info is wrong I'll post it new.

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ (511MB) driver: 19038
ID: 938779 · Report as offensive
Profile BigWaveSurfer

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 01
Posts: 186
Credit: 36,311,381
RAC: 141
United States
Message 938880 - Posted: 10 Oct 2009, 3:05:24 UTC

GeForce 9600 GT (driver version 19107, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 41GFLOPS)
ID: 938880 · Report as offensive
MarkJ Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 08
Posts: 1139
Credit: 80,854,192
RAC: 5
Australia
Message 938959 - Posted: 10 Oct 2009, 11:33:16 UTC
Last modified: 10 Oct 2009, 11:34:08 UTC

All running at stock speeds and all in PCIe slots. All running BOINC 6.10.13 under WinXP.

Kirk:
10/10/2009 9:49:03 PM NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 295 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 106GFLOPS)
10/10/2009 9:49:03 PM NVIDIA GPU 1: GeForce GTX 295 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 106GFLOPS)

Spock:
10/10/2009 8:28:29 PM NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 275 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 120GFLOPS)

Chekov:
9/10/2009 9:10:04 PM ATI GPU 0: ATI Radeon HD 4700/4800 (RV740/RV770) (CAL version 1.3.145, 1024MB, 1000GFLOPS)

Sulu:
10/10/2009 10:11:05 PM NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 295 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 106GFLOPS)
10/10/2009 10:11:05 PM NVIDIA GPU 1: GeForce GTX 295 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 106GFLOPS)

Maul:
9/10/2009 10:18:12 PM NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 96GFLOPS)
9/10/2009 10:18:12 PM NVIDIA GPU 1: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 19062, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 96GFLOPS)
BOINC blog
ID: 938959 · Report as offensive
Jainarine Singh
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 24 Aug 08
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,878,558
RAC: 0
United States
Message 939213 - Posted: 11 Oct 2009, 18:53:50 UTC - in response to Message 938959.  

NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce 9500 GT (driver version 19038, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 16GFLOPS)
ID: 939213 · Report as offensive
_heinz
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 05
Posts: 744
Credit: 5,539,270
RAC: 0
France
Message 939231 - Posted: 11 Oct 2009, 21:07:46 UTC

11.10.2009 15:37:01 ATI GPU 0: ATI Radeon HD 3800 (RV670) (CAL version 1.3.186, 512MB, 509GFLOPS)
no CUDA ;-(
ID: 939231 · Report as offensive
Profile j mercer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 12,323,733
RAC: 1
United States
Message 939331 - Posted: 12 Oct 2009, 6:51:45 UTC

10/11/2009 11:28:27 PM - NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce 8700M GT (driver version 19038, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.1, 512MB, est. 14GFLOPS)

10/11/2009 9:21:27 PM - NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 280M (driver version 19038, CUDA version 2030, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 66GFLOPS)
...
ID: 939331 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 12 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Post your BOINC Startup 'CUDA' Info


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.