Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc 6.6.20 - How's it shaping up?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20283 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
We're now up to Boinc 6.6.20 for the development versions... How's this latest one shaping up for scheduling, CUDA, and whatever else? Happy crunchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
Fred W Send message Joined: 13 Jun 99 Posts: 2524 Credit: 11,954,210 RAC: 0 |
We're now up to Boinc 6.6.20 for the development versions... Looking very good on my rig. Still occasionally see dates reverting to US format and then back in BM and still has a preference to send AP rather than MB for my CPU (not that I mind, just curious that the only time I have 603's recently is when the AP splitters were down). But, overall, the scheduling seems to be working with minimum intervention. F. |
Hammeh Send message Joined: 21 May 01 Posts: 135 Credit: 1,143,316 RAC: 0 |
It is working much better than previous versions. Selecting on Seti@home preferences run to cuda only actually works now, unlike some instances in 6.6.15 i found. |
Richard Walton Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 87 Credit: 192,735 RAC: 0 |
I did the upgrade early because I was only using one cpu for SETI if I got an AP unit. This was because the estimated time for the AP was so high, I could not get scheduler to give me any more work even though I had an idle cpu to do it. That works fine in the upgrade. Within a short time of upgrade, scheduler had sent more than enough- I guess I should have turned the "days on hand" back down before starting up. One thing I noticed is that I saw the old message that 'BOINC could not contact server due to no internet connection and no default connect was set up' - message. I have not seen that for ages back when I had a dial-up connection, and there actually were times I had no connection. But, now I am on connected all the time, and that message was a bit strange since just after it popped up, I did an update, and connection was fine. |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65745 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Of course now 6.6.21 is out for Windows, No sign yet of the Mac and Linux versions. And yeah 6.6.20 works pretty good here too. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
Aurora Borealis Send message Joined: 14 Jan 01 Posts: 3075 Credit: 5,631,463 RAC: 0 |
Many of the problems of V6.4+ have been resolved. I don't have CUDA but from my reading, CUDA/CPU scheduling has been much improved. The only reservation I still have is that on multi-CPU system with multiple project, there exist too much task switching without obvious reasons. Tasks are often suspended to start a different project after running only a few minutes, sometimes even before checkpoint is done. This was not the case in V5. This is being discussed on the mailing list but I don't think the message is getting through to the developers. It's not major, just annoying. V6.6.20 may not become a public release but I can't think of anything major except the above that could be a show stopper. This development line should become the recommended version very soon. EDIT: Thanks for the heads up on V6.6.21. I have a tab open to index/dl but hadn't refreshed or looked at it today. Boinc V7.2.42 Win7 i5 3.33G 4GB, GTX470 |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Of course now 6.6.21 is out for Windows, No sign yet of the Mac and Linux versions. Don't get it at this moment, it's broken. It won't install. Rom's busy with it. I just got news in that BOINC 6.6.20 is going to be released to the public tonight. Best all gather up your FAQs and readme's. :-) |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65745 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Of course now 6.6.21 is out for Windows, No sign yet of the Mac and Linux versions. Thanks Ageless, I'd downloaded It, But hadn't done anything with It, I'll delete the useless thing and await the real McCoy when Rom is done with It. 6.6.20 is going public, Wow! Cool. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
Aurora Borealis Send message Joined: 14 Jan 01 Posts: 3075 Credit: 5,631,463 RAC: 0 |
I had no problem with 6.6.21. I downloaded and installed it immediately after my last post in this thread. What's the problem? It seems to be working fine. Boinc V7.2.42 Win7 i5 3.33G 4GB, GTX470 |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Of course now 6.6.21 is out for Windows, No sign yet of the Mac and Linux versions. Downloaded and installed 6.6.21 in x64 and x86 flavours earlier, seemed to install O.K, will update when new version available. Claggy |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
I had no problem with 6.6.21. I downloaded and installed it immediately after my last post in this thread. What's the problem? It seems to be working fine. It's possible the installer exits with "BOINC -- SetEntriesInAcl Error". Else it's possible it doesn't set the correct permissions for Everyone. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
A bit later than "tonight", but here it is: BOINC 6.6.20 released for Windows, Windows x64, and MacOS X Rom Walton wrote: Howdy Folks, |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
A bit later than "tonight", but here it is: It is a huge improvement on 6.4.x. If you are using 6.4, you should really upgrade. There are some bug fixes that improve overall stability vs 6.2.x and 5.x. The workfetch and CPU schedulers are a bit different though (didn't say better or worse, just a bit different). BOINC WIKI |
archae86 Send message Joined: 31 Aug 99 Posts: 909 Credit: 1,582,816 RAC: 0 |
I've been running 5.10.45 on three of my hosts for months, and 5.10.20 on another for longer. Recently the 5.10.45 hosts lost a couple of days of Einstein credit during an outage. As the bug at hand in that incident is reportedly fixed in modern versions, I installed 6.6.20 on one host today. For others making a similar transition, here are a few comments: 1. I stopped the previous boincmgr, and just double-clicked the file to run the install. 2. It asked very few questions: mostly just queried whether I wanted to change the directories. I accepted the defaults. 3. It took quite a while in the "migrating data" phase (perhaps 15 minutes?) 4. With the install complete, it told me a system restart was required to have BOINC actually run again. 5. On restart, I found I had two instances of BOINCmgr 6.6.20 running, but no actual science aps started up for quite a while. The delay was at least in part because it immediately ran benchmarks. 6. Using msconfig, I found that I now had two BOINCMgr startup conditions set. I turned off one in msconfig, leaving the one with the /a /s flags (not sure that was the right one). 7. For better or worse, on this host I had several third-party BOINC "helper" aps installed under the /program files/BOINC directory, including BOINCView, BoingLogX, and a couple of others. After the 6.6.20 install, I found that it had moved them to the new BOINC data directory under \Documents and Settings\All Users\Application data. Of course this was incompatible with their launch conditions, so I moved them back manually. 9. Once I had moved the third-party stuff back, a restart on BOINCView actually worked without any revised settings or permissions. 10. Much to my surprise, the user interface for BOINCMgr under 6.6.20 seems very similar to that under 5.10.45. 11. as I run COMODO Firewall with some Defense+ options turned on, the relocated science aps were considered "new", and I had to authorize first time run for each. This was made easier than it used to be by the upgrade in 6.6.20 compared to 5.10.45 (actually made long ago), which allows selection of multiple tasks for the Suspend and Resume operations. So I forced first run of the Einstein pulsar search while I was available to "say yes". Hope this helps someone considering making the transition to have a slightly smoother experience. My usage so far is too brief to have noticed whether the scheduler changes have effects I don't like. As I use strongly biased work allocation (96% Einstein, 4% SETI, with that currently devoted to Astropulse v5 on my major hosts) I'll be sensitive to that point. |
elgar Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 69 Credit: 2,687,478 RAC: 0 |
Hello, Is 6.6.20 compatible with the Optimized Clients? And also do we need to deplete our wu cache before installing so we don't trash all of them? |
archae86 Send message Joined: 31 Aug 99 Posts: 909 Credit: 1,582,816 RAC: 0 |
Is 6.6.20 compatible with the Optimized Clients? And also do we need to deplete our wu cache before installing so we don't trash all of them?While cache depletion is always the safest option, I did nothing of that sort for my transition described in message 883983 in this thread. On restart, it appeared to pick up in-process work, obviously using the previous ap_info.xml. While I have no completed tasks yet to add confidence, I think this was OK. Also worth noting, while for my case (accepting defaults, and moving from 5.10.45) the data moved, the program directory did not, so ap_info.xml and the things it refers to remained in their existing locations. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
7. For better or worse, on this host I had several third-party BOINC "helper" aps installed under the /program files/BOINC directory, including BOINCView, BoingLogX, and a couple of others. After the 6.6.20 install, I found that it had moved them to the new BOINC data directory under \Documents and Settings\All Users\Application data. Of course this was incompatible with their launch conditions, so I moved them back manually. Good point. I made it a ticket in Trac, at [trac]#870[/trac] By the way, what happened to your point 8? ;-) |
archae86 Send message Joined: 31 Aug 99 Posts: 909 Credit: 1,582,816 RAC: 0 |
By the way, what happened to your point 8? ;-) Another age-related fault. I caught a number of other typos in reviewing before posting, but missed that one. And now it is too late for me to edit that one. |
-ShEm- Send message Joined: 25 Feb 00 Posts: 139 Credit: 4,129,448 RAC: 0 |
Is 6.6.20 compatible with the Optimized Clients? And also do we need to deplete our wu cache before installing so we don't trash all of them?While cache depletion is always the safest option, I did nothing of that sort for my transition described in message 883983 in this thread. On restart, it appeared to pick up in-process work, obviously using the previous ap_info.xml. While I have no completed tasks yet to add confidence, I think this was OK. I had one issue with app_info.xml on a new Windows 2003 install: Downloaded BOINC 6.6.20, installed in protected mode (aka service), started it, went to advanced mode, attached SETI. Wasn't quick enough to set NNW on SETI so it immediately downloaded a AP-wu. Stopped service, put in arkayn's SSE3 package (PC is a P4 Prescott) & restarted BOINC. Messages didn't show any app_info.xml used for SETI. Checked project dir. Yes, app_info and apps are there along with stock app. Reviewed app_info. Nothing obvious wrong, but to be safe copied a known working app_info from a backup. Restarted BOINC-service. Same thing again: No message about app_info. Rebooted PC. Again same thing. Oh and task manager shows stock app is running, not optimized. Stop service. Reinstal 6.6.20, choosing repair. Again same. Download and install 6.2.19. Start service. Manager won't start: boinc.dll missing. Stop service. Reinstall 6.2.19, choosing repair. boinc.dll is there now. Manager starts. Start service. Messages shows SETI uses opt-app, task manager shows opt-app crunching. Stock app is no longer in project folder :) 5 minutes later: 6.6.20 is released on website and 6.2.19 no longer available (well it is in dl of course). I did download the "new" 6.6.20 and it differs in size from "old" 6.6.20, but don't know what is different and didn't get time to retry from scratch again yet. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
I did download the "new" 6.6.20 and it differs in size from "old" 6.6.20, but don't know what is different and didn't get time to retry from scratch again yet. A fix in the setup of how the 'Everyone' security ID was included in the boinc_users group. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.