Who has slowest cpu with highest rac?

Message boards : Number crunching : Who has slowest cpu with highest rac?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 883735 - Posted: 9 Apr 2009, 18:03:38 UTC - in response to Message 882454.  

Checked at Newegg, only brand 9400 that isn't PCI-E looks to be Sparkle, and they have pretty unfavorable reviews on that card. Too bad EVGA doesn't make one):


EVGA do make one. Check out EVGA 8400 PCI. I just ordered one through OutletPC.com, They're about the only US supplier that take credit cards for international orders and the US seems to be the only country that has CUDA capable (8400 & 9400 chipsets) PCI cards available. Will give a report when it arrives.

Brodo



ID: 883735 · Report as offensive
Cosmic_Ocean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 3027
Credit: 13,516,867
RAC: 13
United States
Message 883745 - Posted: 9 Apr 2009, 18:43:03 UTC

Realistically, there's no reason why the major video card makers (BFG, PALiT, XFX, etc) don't do PCI or AGP models of current GPUs. It's just like the difference between IDE and SATA. The only difference is the communications interface. On the other side of that interface, the hardware is the same. The reason PCI/AGP are hard to find is because the market has moved to PCI-e, and new computers are low-cost enough for it to not be worthwhile to continue holding on to your single-core CPU AGP rigs.

I'm just saying that they -could- do a 9800GT with AGP 8x, but there could be an issue with bandwidth on the AGP bus, and the CPU would likely not be able to keep up, but why would the manufacturer care about that? If enough people want to buy something, it should be made.
Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)
ID: 883745 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 883768 - Posted: 9 Apr 2009, 21:40:01 UTC - in response to Message 883745.  

I'm just saying that they -could- do a 9800GT with AGP 8x, but there could be an issue with bandwidth on the AGP bus, and the CPU would likely not be able to keep up, but why would the manufacturer care about that? If enough people want to buy something, it should be made.


Not that I disagree, but with that same logic I had such a hard time getting people to move off the ISA bus and onto PCI. Some people just don't want to move forward.
ID: 883768 · Report as offensive
Ianab
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Jun 08
Posts: 732
Credit: 20,635,586
RAC: 5
New Zealand
Message 883774 - Posted: 9 Apr 2009, 21:54:55 UTC - in response to Message 883745.  

I guess the reason there aren't many made is that there isn't much demand for them. Any serious gamer will have a PCI-e system board by now, and if you aren't a gamer, then you dont need one.

I have fitted them to customer machines when they wanted to run dual screens on office machines with no PCI-e slot, but that was before the CUDA app was released so I never get to try it out.

Interesting to know how they run. You can only expect so much from that level of GPU, but it would be interesting to stick one in an old pIII and see what it would do.

Ian
ID: 883774 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : Who has slowest cpu with highest rac?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.