Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (14) Server problems
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Andy Williams ![]() Send message Joined: 11 May 01 Posts: 187 Credit: 112,464,820 RAC: 0 ![]() |
The AP splitters have not been running for several hours. I suspect something other than disk space issues. -- Classic 82353 WU / 400979 h ![]() |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13904 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
The AP splitters have not been running for several hours. I suspect something other than disk space issues. Yep. The threshold setting for producing more work. Until the Ready to Send buffer gets below 4,500 i wouldn't expect the splitters to start up again. If it gets below 2,000 & they don't start up, then you can start panicing. Grant Darwin NT |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 ![]() |
The AP splitters have not been running for several hours. I suspect something other than disk space issues. I believe you're partly right, but the AP splitters had been set to stop producing work when the "Ready to send" queue got to about 2500, see the 30 day Scarecrow graphs. Earlier today "Ready to send" reached about 20000 indicating the automatic limiting not working. I think someone had to just shut them down remotely, or maybe there's a last resort safety script which killed them. When automatic limiting is working the status of the ap_splitter processes doesn't go to "Not running". I think it takes human intervention to start them again, if the queue is below 1200 or so tomorrow perhaps someone will do so. Joe |
HarryM Send message Joined: 24 Jul 08 Posts: 68 Credit: 3,812,695 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Their back up running now. |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1646 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
Ehere can I the above graph in real time? ![]() |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Ehere can I the above graph in real time? Copy the link out of the message you quoted, or use the standard page which contains the graph: http://fragment1.berkeley.edu/newcricket/grapher.cgi?target=%2Frouter-interfaces%2Finr-250%2Fgigabitethernet2_3;view=UcastPackets;ranges=d. Joe |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
Ehere can I the above graph in real time? Yeah, either unicast packets/sec (above) or octets/sec can be used. There's different preferences for different people. I find octets to be a better measure of bandwidth consumption, seeing how packets can range in their size, but octets (bytes) are always the same. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1646 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
Ehere can I the above graph in real time? Thanks for that Joe & Cosmic_Ocean ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jul 08 Posts: 259 Credit: 6,607,678 RAC: 4 ![]() |
Is It My imagination or is the server taking time to refresh and to update? Yes... it's... running... very... slowly. |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1646 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
It could be your imagination I'm not sure. Here is the traffic graph [img] http://fragment1.berkeley.edu/newcricket/grapher.cgi?target=%2Frouter-interfaces%2Finr-250%2Fgigabitethernet2_3;view=Octets;ranges=d[/img] Work is flowing ![]() |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13904 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
Is It My imagination or is the server taking a lot of time to refresh and to update? Possibly. There was a similar dive in the traffic at the same time yesterday. And at the moment the forums are slower than a month of wet Sundays. Grant Darwin NT |
FiveHamlet ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Oct 99 Posts: 783 Credit: 32,638,578 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Posting is now somwhat tedious so looks like time for bed. Hope it is resolved by tomorrow. Ooops Today ![]() |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13904 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
Ah, we're back. Something certainly broke for a while there. No uploads, downloads, or even the Seti site. Grant Darwin NT |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19545 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 ![]() ![]() |
Of course now the servers are in full tilt download and uploads are not getting through. Not had any problems here, uploaded, reported and downloaded in just a few seconds. 13/04/2009 05:18:48|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Started upload of file ap_26fe09aa_B4_P1_00283_20090409_31426.wu_0_0 13/04/2009 05:18:49|Einstein@Home|Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks 13/04/2009 05:18:49|Einstein@Home|Requesting 57839 seconds of new work, and reporting 4 completed tasks 13/04/2009 05:18:52|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Finished upload of file ap_26fe09aa_B4_P1_00283_20090409_31426.wu_0_0 13/04/2009 05:18:52|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Throughput 13500 bytes/sec 13/04/2009 05:18:53|Einstein@Home|Scheduler RPC succeeded 13/04/2009 05:18:53|Einstein@Home|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance 13/04/2009 05:18:53|Einstein@Home|Deferring communication for 1 hr 0 min 0 sec 13/04/2009 05:18:53|Einstein@Home|Reason: project is down 13/04/2009 05:18:53|Einstein@Home|Deferring communication for 2 hr 33 min 0 sec 13/04/2009 05:18:53|Einstein@Home|Reason: project is down 13/04/2009 05:18:59|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks 13/04/2009 05:18:59|SETI@home|Requesting 11202 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks 13/04/2009 05:19:04|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 607] 13/04/2009 05:19:04|SETI@home|Deferring communication for 11 sec 13/04/2009 05:19:04|SETI@home|Reason: requested by project 13/04/2009 05:19:06|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Started download of file ap_21fe09ad_B6_P1_00102_20090412_31520.wu 13/04/2009 05:19:40|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Finished download of file ap_21fe09ad_B6_P1_00102_20090412_31520.wu 13/04/2009 05:19:40|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Throughput 253008 bytes/sec |
![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 ![]() |
Might be me. Availability is enough to give me at least one. But not according to my messages: 13-Apr-09 16:06:56 SETI@home [sched_op_debug] CPU work request: 14688.59 seconds; 2 idle CPUs 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home [sched_op_debug] Server version 607 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home Message from server: No work sent 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home Message from server: No work is available for SETI@home Enhanced 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home Message from server: No work available for the applications you have selected. Please check your settings on the web site. 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home Project requested delay of 11 seconds 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home [sched_op_debug] Deferring communication for 11 sec 13-Apr-09 16:07:01 SETI@home [sched_op_debug] Reason: requested by project Only asking a bit of MB. ;-) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Maybe this is just a coincidence, but since switching to BOINC 6.6.20 I've gone from usually having one or two APs waiting, as well as one running, to now having one AP 84% complete, zero waiting, and getting this when I update SETI: 13/04/2009 11:18:15 AM SETI@home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 13/04/2009 11:18:15 AM SETI@home Not reporting or requesting tasks 13/04/2009 11:18:21 AM SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks Is this the SETI servers, or BOINC, or what? I'm running Rosetta and WCG on the same computer, with no big change in their amount of work. ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Maybe this is just a coincidence, but since switching to BOINC 6.6.20 I've gone from usually having one or two APs waiting, as well as one running, to now having one AP 84% complete, zero waiting, and getting this when I update SETI: Cancel the panic, BOINC decided to download 3 APs after my last finished: 13/04/2009 3:40:19 PM SETI@home Started upload of ap_26fe09ab_B0_P0_00137_20090409_17510.wu_2_0 13/04/2009 3:40:24 PM SETI@home Finished upload of ap_26fe09ab_B0_P0_00137_20090409_17510.wu_2_0 13/04/2009 3:40:34 PM SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 13/04/2009 3:40:34 PM SETI@home Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 346 Credit: 104,396,190 RAC: 34 ![]() ![]() |
Holy database crash Batman! Even the cricket reports are offline. Rob ![]() |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.