I noticed that my pending had jumped up from 2,000 to over 3,000.
It has been hovering around 2,000 for months.
And I just run a cache of 0.1 on both my puters.
And i just run MB. i did a random check and it seems to be split between wingman with huge caches and those with small caches. So i dont think thats it.

---

[/quote]

Old James

It was temporary. :(

Pending credit: 3,013,460.61

---

if I see your numbers, so are mine (for 1 machine) not big
Pending credit: 110,570.22

---

D5400XS V8-Xeon

Huhh..

After ~ 10 days my..
Pending credit
..increased from ~ 25,000 to 97,941.48

I'm an ONLY MB cruncher.

Where are the other MB cruncher?

Now all want only AP?

---

I am doing MB's now because AP's have dried up.
Pending credits are going up for me also.
My RAC is falling rapidly due to server problems,but it
is all usefull work.

---

Odd. Over the past 2 weeks my pending has gone from ~60k to ~22k. All those APs are clearing up.

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

I must have been unlucky with wingmen.
I have 94 AP's to validate some from
early and mid April.
Still its credit in the bank log haul.lol

Edit Also there is about 100k
of MB's not being validated to quickly.

---

I must have been unlucky with wingmen.
I have abot 100 AP's to validate some from
early and mid April.
Still its credit in the bank log haul.lol

Yeah, I can relate to that. 90% of the wingmen I get stuck with are first-timers that get the WUs, and then never crunch or return them, never abort/detach, and just leave me hanging for another month for it to be re-issued.

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

lol hell i got like more then 5 wingmen but like you said most are new... so longer credit time

Pending has been the lowest recently, at 33k

Strangely still 26 AP WUs pending validation. Would have expected like <10.

---

I've only got four APs still in pending but it looks like three of them will be going back out to new crunchers near the end of the month. :(

---

PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC

Send me those AP i just opti apped for MB and AP ill take them.

---

[/quote]

Old James

Im just wondering how high I can expect my pending credits to go. Ive been running myu i7 for a week and pendings are at allmost 16,000. Im running Op apps with cuda.

---

[/quote]

Old James

Im just wondering how high I can expect my pending credits to go. Ive been running myu i7 for a week and pendings are at allmost 16,000. Im running Op apps with cuda.

When a system first starts crunching it generally takes at least 4-6 weeks for the RAC to reach it's "normal" level, so it'd probably be a similar time frame for pending credits (although it will probably level off a bit sooner than RAC).

---

Grant
Darwin NT

My pending on my i7 and another couple of lesser rigs has gone from 22k to 135k in the last couple of weeks,so expect anything

---

Im just wondering how high I can expect my pending credits to go. Ive been running myu i7 for a week and pendings are at allmost 16,000. Im running Op apps with cuda.

I have been seeing mine float between 40,000 and 50,000 for the past few weeks.

---

SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[

My pendings have been between 45K and 60K over the last few weeks with just an i7 and two Q9450s, no CUDA.

---

Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now

Thank you all for the answers. My pending is now at 20k plus. My mac and the old P4 were running about 2k pending combined. Im really impressed with the i7 and cuda running App Opps. WOW, if the P4 ever dies im getting another i7.

---

[/quote]

Old James

The problem is exacerbated by the long completion deadlines - 7 weeks or so. Surely this could be cut back to no more than say 4 weeks ?

---

The problem is exacerbated by the long completion deadlines - 7 weeks or so. Surely this could be cut back to no more than say 4 weeks ?

Yes, it could. The change would make some of the slower hosts ineligible for any S@H work, some people think that's a good idea but I don't. Such hosts are relatively rare, and don't contribute much to the perceived "problem" with pending credit. Hosts with very large cache settings are far more numerous.

Supporting hosts with about 1:3000 speed differences (40 MWIPS to 120 GWIPS) does make things awkward for users with hosts near the extremes. Unless the server-side storage needs get out of hand I don't expect the project will want to make a change.

                                                               Joe