pending credits

Message boards : Number crunching : pending credits
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 . . . 15 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Allie in Vancouver
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 3949
Credit: 1,604,668
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 886606 - Posted: 20 Apr 2009, 10:31:58 UTC

41 414 : 2233

18.5 : 1

Looks like it is trending down. :)
Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas.

Albert Einstein
ID: 886606 · Report as offensive
Chelski
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jan 00
Posts: 121
Credit: 8,979,050
RAC: 0
Malaysia
Message 886608 - Posted: 20 Apr 2009, 10:54:14 UTC

Pendings 54,702.68
RAC 12842.05

Ratio 4.25

Not that much credit in the bank anymore, but most of that is the effect of a large cache. Some people will complain that large cache = slow turnaround, but in manufacturing view, downtime of an expensive machine is more expensive than keeping more WIP (as long as it is progressing in a nice steady stream)




ID: 886608 · Report as offensive
Profile KW2E
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 346
Credit: 104,396,190
RAC: 34
United States
Message 886637 - Posted: 20 Apr 2009, 13:29:59 UTC - in response to Message 886608.  

Pending credit: 2,435,546.91
ID: 886637 · Report as offensive
Profile Sterling_Aug
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 02
Posts: 54
Credit: 14,105,725
RAC: 0
United States
Message 886748 - Posted: 20 Apr 2009, 18:47:21 UTC
Last modified: 20 Apr 2009, 18:48:13 UTC

Pending credit: 73,341.73
RAC: 13,723.27 (according to my SETI account page)


5.34 : 1 ratio.
ID: 886748 · Report as offensive
Profile S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 385
Credit: 50,200,038
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 886899 - Posted: 21 Apr 2009, 6:46:05 UTC
Last modified: 21 Apr 2009, 6:47:28 UTC

Pending credit: 100,872.71 (a personal highscore ;)
RAC : 8,714.05
Ratio: 11.6 : 1 ;)
The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS
ID: 886899 · Report as offensive
Profile Allie in Vancouver
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 3949
Credit: 1,604,668
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 887320 - Posted: 22 Apr 2009, 16:35:51 UTC

42 378 : 3502

12 : 1

Getting better. Still not the 2-3 : 1 I used to have when I crunched only MB. Still good, tho. :)
Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas.

Albert Einstein
ID: 887320 · Report as offensive
Profile KW2E
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 346
Credit: 104,396,190
RAC: 34
United States
Message 887406 - Posted: 22 Apr 2009, 22:21:05 UTC - in response to Message 869067.  

Pending credit: 2,564,436.10
ID: 887406 · Report as offensive
Profile Labbie
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Jun 06
Posts: 4083
Credit: 5,930,102
RAC: 0
United States
Message 887456 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 1:56:50 UTC

Pending Credit 42,562, all MB, all CPU.


Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now
ID: 887456 · Report as offensive
Profile S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 385
Credit: 50,200,038
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 887526 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 9:19:00 UTC - in response to Message 887320.  
Last modified: 23 Apr 2009, 9:20:32 UTC

42 378 : 3502

12 : 1

Getting better. Still not the 2-3 : 1 I used to have when I crunched only MB. Still good, tho. :)


I had about the same ratio when I crunched MB only status now:
Pending: 102,004.39 (about the same)
RAC: 10,224.71 (yay, 10k+ ;)

With about the same amount pending, ratio has got better to 10: 1

I have done some calculations, and I expect that my pending is about stable now, and my RAC will increase to about 13.5k, resulting in a ratio of about 7.5 :1 (AP-optimized-only!)

If that would be "about average" (and assuming you are "AP-optimized-only"), then your RAC should get to a 5.6k ;) (and Rob's should go to a staggering 340k!)
The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS
ID: 887526 · Report as offensive
Andy Williams
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 May 01
Posts: 187
Credit: 112,464,820
RAC: 0
United States
Message 887529 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 9:26:56 UTC

Pending credit: 1,341,363.89

Recent average credit 163,353.96

8.2 : 1

Seems like right around 8 : 1 is a steady state these days.
--
Classic 82353 WU / 400979 h
ID: 887529 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 887635 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 16:48:49 UTC

I'm up to around 6.5:1 pending


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 887635 · Report as offensive
Profile Allie in Vancouver
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 3949
Credit: 1,604,668
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 887659 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 17:35:48 UTC - in response to Message 887526.  

42 378 : 3502

12 : 1

Getting better. Still not the 2-3 : 1 I used to have when I crunched only MB. Still good, tho. :)


I had about the same ratio when I crunched MB only status now:
Pending: 102,004.39 (about the same)
RAC: 10,224.71 (yay, 10k+ ;)

With about the same amount pending, ratio has got better to 10: 1

I have done some calculations, and I expect that my pending is about stable now, and my RAC will increase to about 13.5k, resulting in a ratio of about 7.5 :1 (AP-optimized-only!)

If that would be "about average" (and assuming you are "AP-optimized-only"), then your RAC should get to a 5.6k ;) (and Rob's should go to a staggering 340k!)


Hmmm. When I first started Q-Baby last October, I crunched MB-optmized for a month and leveled off at a RAC of 6.8k.

I am not really a credit whore (well, maybe a little bit) but maybe I ought to opt out of AP.

Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas.

Albert Einstein
ID: 887659 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19398
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 887681 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 18:46:44 UTC - in response to Message 887659.  

42 378 : 3502

12 : 1

Getting better. Still not the 2-3 : 1 I used to have when I crunched only MB. Still good, tho. :)


I had about the same ratio when I crunched MB only status now:
Pending: 102,004.39 (about the same)
RAC: 10,224.71 (yay, 10k+ ;)

With about the same amount pending, ratio has got better to 10: 1

I have done some calculations, and I expect that my pending is about stable now, and my RAC will increase to about 13.5k, resulting in a ratio of about 7.5 :1 (AP-optimized-only!)

If that would be "about average" (and assuming you are "AP-optimized-only"), then your RAC should get to a 5.6k ;) (and Rob's should go to a staggering 340k!)


Hmmm. When I first started Q-Baby last October, I crunched MB-optmized for a month and leveled off at a RAC of 6.8k.

I am not really a credit whore (well, maybe a little bit) but maybe I ought to opt out of AP.

If you are doing AP optimised only and using all 4 cores then your RAC will rise to over 9k.
My Q6600 with resource share on seti of 75% has RAC of 8k, but I think that might be a little high. My calculation says it should stabalise at ~7k2.
ID: 887681 · Report as offensive
Profile S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 385
Credit: 50,200,038
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 887719 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 20:52:06 UTC - in response to Message 887659.  

....I am not really a credit whore (well, maybe a little bit) but maybe I ought to opt out of AP.

Opt out? Why, because it would be "credit whoring"? I think it is more a complement to the AP-optimized-builders.. they have created such a great piece of optimized software that it is getting (very) good credits..

Optimized apps don't cheat, they simply do the work faster.. and the last time I checked being efficient is a good thing ;)

(sorry for going OT)
The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS
ID: 887719 · Report as offensive
Profile dnolan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 01
Posts: 1228
Credit: 47,779,411
RAC: 32
United States
Message 887720 - Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 20:53:07 UTC - in response to Message 887681.  


Hmmm. When I first started Q-Baby last October, I crunched MB-optmized for a month and leveled off at a RAC of 6.8k.

I am not really a credit whore (well, maybe a little bit) but maybe I ought to opt out of AP.

If you are doing AP optimised only and using all 4 cores then your RAC will rise to over 9k.
My Q6600 with resource share on seti of 75% has RAC of 8k, but I think that might be a little high. My calculation says it should stabalise at ~7k2.


I have a Q6600 running 2 cores on CPDN and 2 on AP right now, it's showing 5134 RAC for Seti at the moment... It's at 3.1GHz, though, not sure what you guys are running yours at. On all 4 cores, I'd say over 9K is definitely possible, though it taks a LONG time of running AP to get the credit granted vs. credit added to pending to level off. On my systems overall, I'm running at around 302K pending for around 31K RAC, so that's around 9.75:1 - for a dedicated AP cruncher at less than about a 7 or 8 to 1 ratio, I'd say there's still some balancing that needs to happen, unless the system is really slow... which Q6600 systems running optimized are not, even at stock speed.

-Dave
ID: 887720 · Report as offensive
Profile Allie in Vancouver
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 3949
Credit: 1,604,668
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 887774 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 0:17:18 UTC
Last modified: 24 Apr 2009, 0:18:43 UTC

39678 : 4137

9.5 : 1

Coming down nicely now.

I think my rac should settle in at around 8100 (14 - 15 hrs / wu, approx 1250 credit each), but it likely won’t get that high. I shut down for a few hours yesterday and today for maintenance and will be doing the PG challenge for 2 days next week. Then, beginning the first of May and for the summer, I am only crunching at night when it is cooler. (Darn things really heats up my apartment, but not in a good way!)
Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas.

Albert Einstein
ID: 887774 · Report as offensive
UncleVom

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 99
Posts: 123
Credit: 5,734,294
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 887790 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 1:45:04 UTC - in response to Message 887774.  

Pending 94,286.14
I came back for a visit to help out my team mates.
My RAC tends to suckle, currently 7005.56, but it is still slowly climbing up.
When I get my fill of SAH and leave once again at least there will be a chunk in the bank. :-)

UncleVom


ID: 887790 · Report as offensive
Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 8964
Credit: 12,678,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 887813 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 3:42:49 UTC

My Pendings are only 2,230.09 but I generally only run S@H from Midnight to 9 or 10am...


ID: 887813 · Report as offensive
Chelski
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jan 00
Posts: 121
Credit: 8,979,050
RAC: 0
Malaysia
Message 888288 - Posted: 25 Apr 2009, 17:29:28 UTC - in response to Message 887774.  

A high RAC ratio is money in the bank for the rainy days. Keep with AP, it is like investing in Bonds - which give higher yield than cash savings account even though it takes longer to mature.

Shut down my main cruncher for the last 2 days to stay within energy budget, yet RAC maintained to some extend by the pending conversions.

Pending 51,445.23
RAC 11,265.51
Ratio 4.566613496

ID: 888288 · Report as offensive
_heinz
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 05
Posts: 744
Credit: 5,539,270
RAC: 0
France
Message 888356 - Posted: 25 Apr 2009, 22:47:38 UTC

Pending credit: 168,354.35
lost a lot of RAC
18th april 17500
25th april 15500
cry..
;-(
D5400XS V8-Xeon
ID: 888356 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 . . . 15 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : pending credits


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.