I have just received credit for 12 pending v5 AP wus that's about 14,000 credit but waiting on wingmen for another 40+ v5 AP, I wonder what credit Mark has got?

---

I've only got three in pending and none of them validated but at least one of them got looked at so they could send it out again. My wingman screwed it up and I've been waiting 3 or 4 days for it to get reissued.

---

PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC

I've got:

10 pending
3 granted
5 cleared and gone
19 in-progress/queued

That's my ap_v5 experience so far.

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

I see "ap_validate2" is not running again and "waiting for validation" is increasing. Hopefully will be looked at on today's downtime. Had been working for a while recently.

---

I see "ap_validate2" is not running again and "waiting for validation" is increasing. Hopefully will be looked at on today's downtime. Had been working for a while recently.

Then it appears the AP team still hasn't found/fixed the problem. Matt mentioned last week that the script that builds the server status page goes through every 10 minutes and restarts all the processes that have issues. ap_validate2 is specifically for ap_v5, and it gets a few jobs done, and then segfaults, and doesn't get "kicked" until the script runs through again. It is doing something, just not as much as it could be doing.

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

I've got:

10 pending
3 granted
5 cleared and gone
19 in-progress/queued

That's my ap_v5 experience so far.

Mine is:

12 pending
6 cleared and gone
4 in progress/cached

Since 28 Feb

2 cleared and gone
7 pending
1 crunching
2 waiting

Look how many recordings they've loaded on the splitters (Server status page)!

Are the crew all planning to go on vacation together, or something?

Are the crew all planning to go on vacation together, or something?

I suspect they just want more uninterrupted time to try to eliminate server issues (or eliminate those ants ... LOL).

Are the crew all planning to go on vacation together, or something?

I suspect they just want more uninterrupted time to try to eliminate server issues (or eliminate those ants ... LOL).

I think they're trying to refocus all efforts into getting the Nitpicker running in time for their 10th anniversary. Matt has been hinting at this a couple of times in his Tech News already. Next month is the big deadline, and I don't know how much work they have ahead of them.

---

I was going to make some comment last week about there being 50+ "tapes" online. Must have gotten all that new storage working properly. I still think we need more MB splitters though. When I change my venue to non-ap_v5, I keep getting no work available or just one MB at a time. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one.

Still wondering why all I get is ap_v5 even though all are selected. Seems like the scheduler doesn't want me to have anything else..

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

Still wondering why all I get is ap_v5 even though all are selected. Seems like the scheduler doesn't want me to have anything else..

Do re-issued tasks get priority when work is being sent out?

It could be that the thousands of APv5's getting quota trashed every night are clogging the pipes.

/edit, Not sure more splitters are needed since the ready to send is usually full. Perhaps more feeder cache space.

Nope Reissues are sent out and ran as regular work. and given the same TAT as it had before.

---

In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope

I have been getting this message on my work computer since early January.
I have not recieved any new work units forever. What has happened ?

03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Starting BOINC client version 6.4.7 for windows_x86_64
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Libraries: libcurl/7.19.4 OpenSSL/0.9.8j zlib/1.2.3
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Data directory: D:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Running under account ebphilli
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Processor: 4 AuthenticAMD Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2218 [AMD64 Family 15 Model 65 Stepping 3]
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x64 Editon, Service Pack 2, (05.02.3790.00)
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Memory: 8.00 GB physical, 9.57 GB virtual
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Disk: 114.94 GB total, 73.15 GB free
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Local time is UTC -5 hours
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Not using a proxy
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||No CUDA devices found
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||No coprocessors
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM|SETI@home|URL: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/; Computer ID: 3282799; location: work; project prefs: default
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||General prefs: from SETI@home (last modified 26-Aug-2006 13:53:17)
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Computer location: work
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||General prefs: no separate prefs for work; using your defaults
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Reading preferences override file
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Preferences limit memory usage when active to 4095.55MB
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Preferences limit memory usage when idle to 7371.98MB
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Preferences limit disk usage to 0.10GB

03/18/2009 4:05:17 PM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 120960 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
03/18/2009 4:05:18 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
03/18/2009 4:05:19 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
03/18/2009 4:05:22 PM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)

---

3/18/2009 8:03:52 PM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
3/18/2009 8:04:14 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
3/18/2009 8:04:15 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
3/18/2009 8:04:17 PM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server

3/18/2009 8:04:42 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
3/18/2009 8:05:03 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
3/18/2009 8:05:04 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
3/18/2009 8:05:07 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server

No problems on any of my 3 computers.

---

Slight burp a couple of hours ago, but everything ok since.

18/03/2009 9:37:30 PM SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
18/03/2009 9:37:30 PM SETI@home Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
18/03/2009 9:38:51 PM SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
18/03/2009 9:39:43 PM SETI@home Started download of 30dc08aa.30892.10297.6.8.118
18/03/2009 9:41:00 PM SETI@home Temporarily failed download of 30dc08aa.30892.10297.6.8.118: connect() failed
18/03/2009 9:41:00 PM SETI@home Backing off 1 min 0 sec on download of 30dc08aa.30892.10297.6.8.118
18/03/2009 9:42:17 PM SETI@home [error] File 30dc08aa.30892.10297.6.8.118 has wrong size: expected 375342, got 0
18/03/2009 9:42:17 PM SETI@home Started download of 30dc08aa.30892.10297.6.8.118
18/03/2009 9:43:38 PM SETI@home Finished download of 30dc08aa.30892.10297.6.8.118

I have been getting this message on my work computer since early January.
I have not recieved any new work units forever. What has happened ?

03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Starting BOINC client version 6.4.7 for windows_x86_64
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Libraries: libcurl/7.19.4 OpenSSL/0.9.8j zlib/1.2.3
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Data directory: D:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC
03/18/2009 9:07:25 AM||Running under account ebphilli
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Processor: 4 AuthenticAMD Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2218 [AMD64 Family 15 Model 65 Stepping 3]
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x64 Editon, Service Pack 2, (05.02.3790.00)
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Memory: 8.00 GB physical, 9.57 GB virtual
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Disk: 114.94 GB total, 73.15 GB free
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Local time is UTC -5 hours
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||Not using a proxy
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||No CUDA devices found
03/18/2009 9:07:26 AM||No coprocessors
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM|SETI@home|URL: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/; Computer ID: 3282799; location: work; project prefs: default
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||General prefs: from SETI@home (last modified 26-Aug-2006 13:53:17)
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Computer location: work
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||General prefs: no separate prefs for work; using your defaults
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Reading preferences override file
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Preferences limit memory usage when active to 4095.55MB
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Preferences limit memory usage when idle to 7371.98MB
03/18/2009 9:07:27 AM||Preferences limit disk usage to 0.10GB

03/18/2009 4:05:17 PM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 120960 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
03/18/2009 4:05:18 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
03/18/2009 4:05:19 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
03/18/2009 4:05:22 PM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)

It seems it was a short break/pause, but now it is working again smoothly...
Can you confirm Edward?
Cheers!

---

I am still not getting any new work units to process. Here is the last message I recieved today.

03/19/2009 9:49:42 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)
03/19/2009 10:04:07 AM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 120960 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
03/19/2009 10:04:08 AM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
03/19/2009 10:04:10 AM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
03/19/2009 10:04:12 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)

---

I am still not getting any new work units to process. Here is the last message I recieved today.

03/19/2009 9:49:42 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)
03/19/2009 10:04:07 AM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 120960 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
03/19/2009 10:04:08 AM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
03/19/2009 10:04:10 AM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
03/19/2009 10:04:12 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)

Edward, do you have your PC working on a 24/7 basis?
Do you turn it off/on every day?
Maybe your settings are not up to date anymore....I see you joined long time ago but your RAC is very low. You need indeed a long time of inactivity if you show only 4 as your RAC.
I have only one Astropulse crunching for the last three days, so I had no connections to the SETI server for uploading any work units, but Einstein is running/operating fine.
I would check the settings and reboot the PC.

---