Payola... (Don't I wish!)

Author	Message
Virtual Boss* Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 May 08 Posts: 417 Credit: 6,440,287 RAC: 0	Message 854558 - Posted: 17 Jan 2009, 6:59:33 UTC - in response to Message 854349. As the BORG would say: CUDA will be repaired and assimilated, speculation is futile !!! I would never say that. Sorry! - As the OTHER BORG would say .......... ID: 854558 ·

Ivailo Bonev Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Jun 00 Posts: 247 Credit: 35,864,461 RAC: 2	Message 854600 - Posted: 17 Jan 2009, 10:29:27 UTC Thanks for answers Eric! I wish for the project, year with more donations, and if start of the year was so bad, the end will be so good. With CUDA, project have a vision of the future. And for all stuff from BOINC and S@H, I wish you better life and good health for a whole 2009 year! ID: 854600 ·

Fred J. Verster Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Apr 04 Posts: 3252 Credit: 31,903,643 RAC: 0	Message 854622 - Posted: 17 Jan 2009, 13:00:14 UTC - in response to Message 854600. Hi Eric, thanks for your clear explanation. And I do like this style! ID: 854622 ·

Sutaru Tsureku Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5	Message 855052 - Posted: 18 Jan 2009, 15:27:37 UTC - in response to Message 854526. Because of simultanously MB/AP on CPU and MB (AP?*) on GPU.. The devs are on this, that it'll be possible in future? (also with optimized apps?) That's the plan... A teammate use BOINC V6.6.0 and crunch simultanously MB/AP on CPU and MB on GPU. (stock apps) He made something 'wrong' or is this possible in BOINC V6.6.0? If it's not possible.. with which Version it'll be possible? ID: 855052 ·

Borgholio Send message Joined: 2 Aug 99 Posts: 654 Credit: 18,623,738 RAC: 45	Message 855821 - Posted: 20 Jan 2009, 23:10:12 UTC So I take it that Cuda 6.08 didn't quite pass muster in beta? :) You will be assimilated...bunghole! ID: 855821 ·

Josef W. Segur Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0	Message 855847 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 0:51:05 UTC - in response to Message 855821. So I take it that Cuda 6.08 didn't quite pass muster in beta? :) Reports are good, and it's only been in Beta for 5 days. Even 6.06, for which there was pressure to meet a planned date, got 7 days of Beta test. Joe ID: 855847 ·

Borgholio Send message Joined: 2 Aug 99 Posts: 654 Credit: 18,623,738 RAC: 45	Message 855872 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 2:49:55 UTC - in response to Message 855847. Ahh good to hear. Looking forward to it! You will be assimilated...bunghole! ID: 855872 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14550 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874	Message 855981 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 14:44:07 UTC - in response to Message 855847. Last modified: 21 Jan 2009, 14:45:08 UTC So I take it that Cuda 6.08 didn't quite pass muster in beta? :) Reports are good, and it's only been in Beta for 5 days. Even 6.06, for which there was pressure to meet a planned date, got 7 days of Beta test. Joe v6.08 has been installed for download on the Main project, but reports in Number Crunching suggest that Murphy has been playing around with the checksum. ID: 855981 ·

©2023 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.