Questions and Answers :
GPU applications :
display was cratered by recent batch of WU's
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 309 Credit: 70,759,933 RAC: 3 ![]() |
My display was done in by the last batch of WU's starting with 39312xxxx. This was with the new 181.20 whql driver. Some statistics (34 wu's): 5 good or probably good WU's 16 "success" that were obviously errors 13 computation error So out of 34 wu's (39312xxxx) processed on my gfx280, there are 5 good ones. The first 6 "computaton error" I checked the tasks info and sure enough the angle was small, about 0.01 The 16 "success" ones that were obvious error were all less then 20 sec duration and the task info indicated there was no room for results. This should have been declared an error. The good WU's seem to be scattered about the bad one and it is not obvious if a bad WU, and the resulting snow, affects subsequent work units. All the WU's are reported received about the same time (obviously) and I am going with the serial number of the task id to determine the order they were processed. It would be nice if the project reported the elapsed time and gave a time stamp of completion. That was one can easily determine if a bad WU affected the remaining WU's or not. system info: vista 64, intel, gfx280 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=4711247 |
Paul DT Scully ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jun 04 Posts: 26 Credit: 259,861 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Looks likes you have the same problem with the Nvidia drivers 181.20 Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 Mem: 4GB 8800GT 181.22 BOINC 6.6.3 Win64 ![]() ACTIVE PROJECTS |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.