Snagged a couple of Astropulse WU's

Message boards : Number crunching : Snagged a couple of Astropulse WU's
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 66201
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 793808 - Posted: 6 Aug 2008, 18:08:22 UTC

I now have two Astros :D, No fleas, No ticks and No License either. ;)
Savoir-Faire is everywhere!
The T1 Trust, T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, America's First HST

ID: 793808 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 793835 - Posted: 6 Aug 2008, 19:23:20 UTC

On my Q9450 running in tandem with AK-V8 SSSE3x, the one AP WU that I have crunched so far took just about 3x the initial estimate to complete and it then took the machine about an hour to get back out of EDF mode for the Enhanced WU's.

F.
ID: 793835 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 793844 - Posted: 6 Aug 2008, 20:02:03 UTC

Both of my machines have now gotten AP work, the iMac has yet to get to the unit as I keep a 4 day cache on it but should start crunching it sometime today.

ID: 793844 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 66201
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 793870 - Posted: 6 Aug 2008, 21:15:05 UTC - in response to Message 793835.  

On my Q9450 running in tandem with AK-V8 SSSE3x, the one AP WU that I have crunched so far took just about 3x the initial estimate to complete and it then took the machine about an hour to get back out of EDF mode for the Enhanced WU's.

F.

Mine both say 10:57:58(HH:MM:SS), If I had the water cooling I need I would think that time would go down as I could then crank up the speed some around here on My Q9300. :)
Savoir-Faire is everywhere!
The T1 Trust, T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, America's First HST

ID: 793870 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 793892 - Posted: 6 Aug 2008, 22:02:40 UTC

I just started crunching the AP unit and so far the time remaining is going steadily up.

ID: 793892 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 793948 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 0:23:58 UTC - in response to Message 793870.  

Mine both say 10:57:58(HH:MM:SS), If I had the water cooling I need I would think that time would go down as I could then crank up the speed some around here on My Q9300. :)

Back in June, the Frozen Penny did some Beta work with AP4.33, took a little over 20 hours IIRC.
                                                                Joe
ID: 793948 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 66201
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 793982 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 1:24:23 UTC - in response to Message 793948.  

Mine both say 10:57:58(HH:MM:SS), If I had the water cooling I need I would think that time would go down as I could then crank up the speed some around here on My Q9300. :)

Back in June, the Frozen Penny did some Beta work with AP4.33, took a little over 20 hours IIRC.
                                                                Joe

The Q9300 here is overclocked and is at 3.29GHz at the moment, But We shall See I guess.
Savoir-Faire is everywhere!
The T1 Trust, T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, America's First HST

ID: 793982 · Report as offensive
JRL

Send message
Joined: 23 Feb 06
Posts: 31
Credit: 219,472
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794197 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 15:55:51 UTC

I have one AP unit running on a AMD 9850 (4 processor running at 2.5G).
The time to complete started at 39 hours. After running 27 hours the total time now be over 70 hours.
Just how big is this file?


Going from the performance of other AMD cpu's during testing before release here, 70 hrs would seem about right.

It now reports it is 48$ done, 45 hours.
Time to complete is 36 hours.
This is on a machine that is NOT 24/7. At this rate it will not complete by the due date.
ID: 794197 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794218 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 17:05:30 UTC

18 hours in and I am currently at 22% on my 2GHz C2D.

ID: 794218 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 794226 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 17:27:18 UTC - in response to Message 794218.  

18 hours in and I am currently at 22% on my 2GHz C2D.

Took 80 hours on my lap-top C2D running at 100%. Not wise to hold your breath waiting ;)

F.
ID: 794226 · Report as offensive
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1066
Credit: 1,226,053
RAC: 2
United States
Message 794240 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 18:35:32 UTC - in response to Message 794226.  

18 hours in and I am currently at 22% on my 2GHz C2D.

Took 80 hours on my lap-top C2D running at 100%. Not wise to hold your breath waiting ;)

F.


What are the minimum requirements for my computer to run Astropulse?
* Minimum CPU: 1.6 GHz
* Minimum RAM: 256 MB
* Minimum disk space: 128 MB

Do these requirements seem a bit low? They do to me. Based on this minimum CPU, how long would an AP WU take to run completely?
ID: 794240 · Report as offensive
Profile Helsionium
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 06
Posts: 156
Credit: 86,214,817
RAC: 43
Austria
Message 794261 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 19:32:46 UTC

I finally got an Astropulse WU today, too.
The time estimate is slightly bothering me, though. It started at 25 hours and is currently 33 hours. I hope it will drop again when crunching actually begins, otherwise my machine might not ask for more work.

BTW, does BOINC ask for more work when it has a single workunit with a 24+ hours when cache is set to only 0.5 days (12 hours) on a dual core processor?

ID: 794261 · Report as offensive
Profile Dave Sedgwick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 28
Credit: 1,700,859
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794307 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 21:51:29 UTC

I am running the S@H Enhanced 5.28 (Mac PPC). Been chugging along now for a few days with a fresh install. If I have not seen any AP units show up, is it safe to assume my Mac is determined to be too slow? As I understand it, if we are running the stock seti app (as I am), it would automatically give us the AP app and units if we could run them. We only have to do those installs ourselves if running an optimized app, correct?

Sedge
if by chance an honest man like yourself were to make enemies, they would become my enemies. and then they will fear you.
ID: 794307 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 794312 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 21:56:34 UTC - in response to Message 794307.  

I am running the S@H Enhanced 5.28 (Mac PPC). Been chugging along now for a few days with a fresh install. If I have not seen any AP units show up, is it safe to assume my Mac is determined to be too slow? As I understand it, if we are running the stock seti app (as I am), it would automatically give us the AP app and units if we could run them. We only have to do those installs ourselves if running an optimized app, correct?

Sedge

Correct!

F.
ID: 794312 · Report as offensive
Profile Dave Sedgwick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 28
Credit: 1,700,859
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794325 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 22:25:06 UTC

Bummer! Was thinking, as I have been churning through Seti units at around 3 hours lately that even if those AP units took 30 times longer I'd still be way under the 30 day window. Alas, will keep running the old ones til a new Mac shows up.

Sedge
if by chance an honest man like yourself were to make enemies, they would become my enemies. and then they will fear you.
ID: 794325 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 794329 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 22:40:08 UTC - in response to Message 794325.  

Bummer! Was thinking, as I have been churning through Seti units at around 3 hours lately that even if those AP units took 30 times longer I'd still be way under the 30 day window. Alas, will keep running the old ones til a new Mac shows up.

Sedge

Well... That's the way that it's supposed to work. But from posts in other threads here, it appears that the system might be trying to download AP WU's to "unsuitable" hosts, so you might strike lucky :)

F.
ID: 794329 · Report as offensive
Profile Dave Sedgwick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 28
Credit: 1,700,859
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794332 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 22:43:12 UTC

:) well, i may not have quite all the raw speed, but my Macs have been searching non stop, each and every day, since May 14, 1999. so i do have the dedication. hoping i can give one of those suckers a try soon!

Sedge
if by chance an honest man like yourself were to make enemies, they would become my enemies. and then they will fear you.
ID: 794332 · Report as offensive
Profile [KWSN]John Galt 007
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Nov 99
Posts: 2444
Credit: 25,086,197
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794337 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 22:54:23 UTC - in response to Message 794307.  

I am running the S@H Enhanced 5.28 (Mac PPC). Been chugging along now for a few days with a fresh install. If I have not seen any AP units show up, is it safe to assume my Mac is determined to be too slow? As I understand it, if we are running the stock seti app (as I am), it would automatically give us the AP app and units if we could run them. We only have to do those installs ourselves if running an optimized app, correct?

Sedge


See this thread by Dotsch. He compiled Astropulse for the Mac. Have at it, if you like...
Clk2HlpSetiCty:::PayIt4ward

ID: 794337 · Report as offensive
Profile Dave Sedgwick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 28
Credit: 1,700,859
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794339 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 22:57:18 UTC

i did try that, but i seem to be doing something wrong, as i keep getting the error 1202, even after i think i have changed the ownership via Terminal. currently over at the MacNN forums seeing if i can get some help there.

Sedge
if by chance an honest man like yourself were to make enemies, they would become my enemies. and then they will fear you.
ID: 794339 · Report as offensive
Arm

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 03
Posts: 308
Credit: 15,584,777
RAC: 0
Message 794364 - Posted: 7 Aug 2008, 23:28:59 UTC

40 hours on Q6600. The result is valid and awaiting for my wingmate somewher in the future - he is running some kind of laptop as his stats shows T2050 at 1.6 GHz. The good thing is that he is running stock apps and will probably return a valid result too.
ID: 794364 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Snagged a couple of Astropulse WU's


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.