Panic Mode On (8) Server problems

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (8) Server problems
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 . . . 15 · Next

AuthorMessage
Iona
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 790
Credit: 22,438,118
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 798980 - Posted: 16 Aug 2008, 20:35:20 UTC

Oh well, its getting rather warm in the room where the two PCs are (the PC at the warm end is only running one WU at a time, whilst the PC at the cool end is running normally!), so, as I've kept them at 1 days cache, a little break might not be a bad thing. I'll have to get my 'nearest and dearest' to rig-up an extraction system, like you get with some tumble driers......




Don't take life too seriously, as you'll never come out of it alive!
ID: 798980 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 64912
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 799027 - Posted: 16 Aug 2008, 21:18:30 UTC - in response to Message 798980.  
Last modified: 16 Aug 2008, 21:23:48 UTC

Oh well, its getting rather warm in the room where the two PCs are (the PC at the warm end is only running one WU at a time, whilst the PC at the cool end is running normally!), so, as I've kept them at 1 days cache, a little break might not be a bad thing. I'll have to get my 'nearest and dearest' to rig-up an extraction system, like you get with some tumble driers......




Yeah It's warm alright, But I have 3 PCs, Actually I have 5, But one is old and the other I don't feel like bringing online yet, As 86-88F is warm enough for Me. Thankfully I have about a 4.5 day cache and fortunately 2 PCs are doing Astropulse(2 on 1 and 1 on the other). Uploads are working, But the scheduler appears to be AWOL so far, Maybe It needs one of those (Marvin)Martians to get It started again. ;)

Oh and back to the Olympics, GO USA!! Beat those Croats in Water Polo!

CRO 5
USA 7

This score is in the 4th quarter.

USA wins!! Score same as before 7-5.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 799027 · Report as offensive
Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 8958
Credit: 12,678,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 799034 - Posted: 16 Aug 2008, 21:25:32 UTC
Last modified: 16 Aug 2008, 21:33:20 UTC

I have placed a phone call to Eric and he is indisposed, but Angela will let him know as soon as he is free.

5:30pm EST update-I just uploaded and reported 3 results


ID: 799034 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 64912
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 799040 - Posted: 16 Aug 2008, 21:32:22 UTC - in response to Message 799034.  

I have placed a phone call to Eric and he is indisposed, but Angela will let him know as soon as he is free.

Ok, Although It's looking a bit better:), I hope, Marvin must have got B Bunny with His Disintegrating gun. ;)


The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 799040 · Report as offensive
Profile Andy Lee Robinson
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 05
Posts: 630
Credit: 59,973,836
RAC: 0
Hungary
Message 799059 - Posted: 16 Aug 2008, 22:06:00 UTC - in response to Message 798403.  

If everyone would REDUCE their cache size to only TWO days, or even only ONE day, there would be adequate disk space for the system to operate efficiently.

Also, please be sure to upload and report finished workunits promptly to get them off the system.

It is the hoarding of workunits that is causing most of the problems right now.

Sure, there are occasional breakdowns, but they are usually recovered within 24 hours or less, so a TWO day cache is more than enough for most circumstances.


Well Said, Whit. I couldn't agree more!
ID: 799059 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13351
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 800164 - Posted: 20 Aug 2008, 18:28:01 UTC


Possible problem?
Network traffic is pretty much normal, but the Ready to Send buffer is dropping & the splitters haven't picked up the pace to fill it up again.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 800164 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 64912
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 800279 - Posted: 21 Aug 2008, 1:35:39 UTC

Well somebody is having trouble or did.

Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
(C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>tracert setiathome.berkeley.edu

Tracing route to setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms L100.DSL-35.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [71.105.32.1]
2 28 ms 29 ms 29 ms G9-0-2935.LCR-09.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [130.81.136.14]
3 29 ms 28 ms 29 ms 130.81.28.72
4 30 ms 114 ms 30 ms 0.so-7-2-0.XT2.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.153]
5 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XT1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.116.249]
6 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms 0.so-6-0-0.BR1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.112.41]
7 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 204.255.169.194
8 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms los-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.9]
9 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms los-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.34]
10 68 ms 39 ms 31 ms 63.147.28.182
11 87 ms 111 ms 41 ms dc-oak-isp--lax-isp-t2.cenic.net [137.164.40.230]
12 43 ms 43 ms 43 ms inet-ucb--oak-isp.cenic.net [137.164.24.142]
13 973 ms * * g4-1.inr-202-reccev.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.0.50]
14 * 971 ms * g6-2.inr-230-spr.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.255.114]
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 * * 956 ms thinman.ssl.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>ping setiathome.berkeley.edu

Pinging setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Reply from 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 time=951ms TTL=51
Request timed out.
Reply from 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 time=970ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 128.32.18.150:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 951ms, Maximum = 970ms, Average = 960ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>

Is It this SLOOOOOOWWW for anybody else?
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 800279 · Report as offensive
Profile Logan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jan 07
Posts: 743
Credit: 918,353
RAC: 0
Spain
Message 800284 - Posted: 21 Aug 2008, 1:51:33 UTC - in response to Message 800279.  

Well somebody is having trouble or did.

Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
(C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>tracert setiathome.berkeley.edu

Tracing route to setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms L100.DSL-35.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [71.105.32.1]
2 28 ms 29 ms 29 ms G9-0-2935.LCR-09.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [130.81.136.14]
3 29 ms 28 ms 29 ms 130.81.28.72
4 30 ms 114 ms 30 ms 0.so-7-2-0.XT2.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.153]
5 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XT1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.116.249]
6 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms 0.so-6-0-0.BR1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.112.41]
7 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 204.255.169.194
8 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms los-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.9]
9 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms los-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.34]
10 68 ms 39 ms 31 ms 63.147.28.182
11 87 ms 111 ms 41 ms dc-oak-isp--lax-isp-t2.cenic.net [137.164.40.230]
12 43 ms 43 ms 43 ms inet-ucb--oak-isp.cenic.net [137.164.24.142]
13 973 ms * * g4-1.inr-202-reccev.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.0.50]
14 * 971 ms * g6-2.inr-230-spr.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.255.114]
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 * * 956 ms thinman.ssl.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>ping setiathome.berkeley.edu

Pinging setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Reply from 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 time=951ms TTL=51
Request timed out.
Reply from 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 time=970ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 128.32.18.150:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 951ms, Maximum = 970ms, Average = 960ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>

Is It this SLOOOOOOWWW for anybody else?


Haciendo ping a 128.32.18.150 con 32 bytes de datos: Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=205ms TTL=44
Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=214ms TTL=44
Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=213ms TTL=44
Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=202ms TTL=44 Estadísticas de ping para 128.32.18.150:
Paquetes: enviados = 4, recibidos = 4, perdidos = 0 (0%perdidos)
Tiempos aproximados de ida y vuelta en milisegundos:
Mínimo = 202ms, Máximo = 214ms, Media = 208ms

Here now. But a few minutes ago all was very slow...


Best regards.
Logan.

BOINC FAQ Service (Ahora, también disponible en Español/Now available in Spanish)
ID: 800284 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 64912
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 800286 - Posted: 21 Aug 2008, 2:02:02 UTC - in response to Message 800284.  

Well somebody is having trouble or did.

Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
(C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>tracert setiathome.berkeley.edu

Tracing route to setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms L100.DSL-35.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [71.105.32.1]
2 28 ms 29 ms 29 ms G9-0-2935.LCR-09.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [130.81.136.14]
3 29 ms 28 ms 29 ms 130.81.28.72
4 30 ms 114 ms 30 ms 0.so-7-2-0.XT2.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.153]
5 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XT1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.116.249]
6 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms 0.so-6-0-0.BR1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.112.41]
7 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 204.255.169.194
8 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms los-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.9]
9 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms los-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.34]
10 68 ms 39 ms 31 ms 63.147.28.182
11 87 ms 111 ms 41 ms dc-oak-isp--lax-isp-t2.cenic.net [137.164.40.230]
12 43 ms 43 ms 43 ms inet-ucb--oak-isp.cenic.net [137.164.24.142]
13 973 ms * * g4-1.inr-202-reccev.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.0.50]
14 * 971 ms * g6-2.inr-230-spr.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.255.114]
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 * * 956 ms thinman.ssl.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>ping setiathome.berkeley.edu

Pinging setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Reply from 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 time=951ms TTL=51
Request timed out.
Reply from 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 time=970ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 128.32.18.150:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 951ms, Maximum = 970ms, Average = 960ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>

Is It this SLOOOOOOWWW for anybody else?


Haciendo ping a 128.32.18.150 con 32 bytes de datos: Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=205ms TTL=44
Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=214ms TTL=44
Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=213ms TTL=44
Respuesta desde 128.32.18.150: bytes=32 tiempo=202ms TTL=44 Estadísticas de ping para 128.32.18.150:
Paquetes: enviados = 4, recibidos = 4, perdidos = 0 (0%perdidos)
Tiempos aproximados de ida y vuelta en milisegundos:
Mínimo = 202ms, Máximo = 214ms, Media = 208ms

Here now. But a few minutes ago all was very slow...


Best regards.

Yeah, I think the proverbial snail or maybe molasses was quicker for a little bit, I'm glad It cleared Itself up or that somebody somewhere cleared whatever was slowing access around here.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 800286 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13351
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 801059 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008, 0:08:52 UTC


What gives?
Huge amount of network traffic, yet the Ready to Send buffer is stable and the splitters are barely turning over to maintain it.

Anyone got any ideas?
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 801059 · Report as offensive
Profile Uli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 00
Posts: 10923
Credit: 5,996,015
RAC: 1
Germany
Message 801060 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008, 0:16:36 UTC

Crunchers might be refilling their caches. I had to, since I was on my last WUs.
Pluto will always be a planet to me.

Seti Ambassador
Not to late to order an Anni Shirt
ID: 801060 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13351
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 801062 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008, 0:38:35 UTC - in response to Message 801060.  
Last modified: 23 Aug 2008, 0:39:12 UTC

Crunchers might be refilling their caches. I had to, since I was on my last WUs.

If that were the case, then the Ready to Send buffer would be shrinking, or the splitters would be in high gear to maintain the buffer.
I thought of existing Work Units being re-issued, but i wouldn't expect such a sustained level of traffic as we're getting at the moment.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 801062 · Report as offensive
Profile Geek@Play
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Jul 01
Posts: 2467
Credit: 86,146,931
RAC: 0
United States
Message 801088 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008, 1:54:33 UTC - in response to Message 801059.  
Last modified: 23 Aug 2008, 1:55:00 UTC


What gives?
Huge amount of network traffic, yet the Ready to Send buffer is stable and the splitters are barely turning over to maintain it.

Anyone got any ideas?


Erics post may give a hint. Perhaps they decided not to wait until Monday and everyone is downloading the new science app directly from here instead of another site.
Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....
ID: 801088 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13351
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 801161 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008, 5:38:30 UTC - in response to Message 801088.  

Erics post may give a hint. Perhaps they decided not to wait until Monday and everyone is downloading the new science app directly from here instead of another site.

Certainly seems feasible.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 801161 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13351
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 802228 - Posted: 26 Aug 2008, 3:08:22 UTC


Another glitch?
Heaps of network traffic, Ready to Send buffer dropping steadily, but the splitters are still just ilding along.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 802228 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13351
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 802255 - Posted: 26 Aug 2008, 6:22:22 UTC


Ready to Send buffer contiues to shrink. Should be out of work (other than what the splitters can provide) any minute now.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 802255 · Report as offensive
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1065
Credit: 1,226,053
RAC: 2
United States
Message 802393 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 1:34:33 UTC - in response to Message 802255.  


Ready to Send buffer contiues to shrink. Should be out of work (other than what the splitters can provide) any minute now.


Can you be anymore pessimistic? The servers are working...

Results ready to send 20,123 9m
Current result creation rate 22.35/sec 0m
ID: 802393 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13351
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 802456 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 5:42:49 UTC - in response to Message 802393.  


Ready to Send buffer contiues to shrink. Should be out of work (other than what the splitters can provide) any minute now.


Can you be anymore pessimistic? The servers are working...

Results ready to send 20,123 9m
Current result creation rate 22.35/sec 0m

Since there was almost a day between the time i made my posts, and when you made yours, it's not surprising that things had chaged somewhat.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 802456 · Report as offensive
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1065
Credit: 1,226,053
RAC: 2
United States
Message 802598 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 20:27:36 UTC - in response to Message 802456.  

Since there was almost a day between the time i made my posts, and when you made yours, it's not surprising that things had chaged somewhat.


Well, no offense sir. I'm glad the scheduled downtime on Tuesday got all the processes caught up. It's hard to catch up once the system gets behind.
ID: 802598 · Report as offensive
Profile Bernie Vine
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 9949
Credit: 103,452,613
RAC: 328
United Kingdom
Message 803235 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008, 22:02:06 UTC

Seems to be a problem

29/08/2008 22:34:38|SETI@home|Finished upload of 31mr08aa.5514.7025.9.8.175_2_0
29/08/2008 22:41:26|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 2821 seconds of work, reporting 2 completed tasks
29/08/2008 22:41:31|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks

See Cricket




ID: 803235 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 . . . 15 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (8) Server problems


 
©2022 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.