Astropulse - how to get it when using optimized SETI@home?

Message boards : Number crunching : Astropulse - how to get it when using optimized SETI@home?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Byron S Goodgame
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 1145
Credit: 3,936,993
RAC: 0
United States
Message 794927 - Posted: 9 Aug 2008, 4:24:42 UTC - in response to Message 794917.  

I would say double that as my T7200(2.0 GHz) is running toward 80 hours.


That sounds more realistic to me from other comments I've seen on the boards.
ID: 794927 · Report as offensive
Urs Echternacht
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 692
Credit: 135,197,781
RAC: 211
Germany
Message 795100 - Posted: 9 Aug 2008, 13:51:46 UTC - in response to Message 794917.  

I would say double that as my T7200(2.0 GHz) is running toward 80 hours.

If so, it looks like the AstroPulse application for the MAC is a bit slower than the stock Linux and Windows x86 applications are. My T7200 (2.0GHz) needed ca. 61 hours for its first AP wu (wuid 310110487).
That is exactly the same timerange i have seen during beta testing.
_\|/_
U r s
ID: 795100 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65746
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 795127 - Posted: 9 Aug 2008, 15:15:31 UTC
Last modified: 9 Aug 2008, 15:30:48 UTC

ID: 795127 · Report as offensive
Olivier ROGER-SOULILLOU

Send message
Joined: 28 May 06
Posts: 37
Credit: 501,017
RAC: 0
France
Message 795151 - Posted: 9 Aug 2008, 16:24:11 UTC

i got recently an astropulse workunit,working very well, but of course it will be rather long, even with multiprocessors computer.. anyway, this becomes very interesting . these works have to remain to all that it's first a work for science, with a lot of patience, and not just for lil points..
ID: 795151 · Report as offensive
Profile Pappa
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jan 00
Posts: 2562
Credit: 12,301,681
RAC: 0
United States
Message 795171 - Posted: 9 Aug 2008, 17:10:26 UTC

I have been working to move AP Issues and general comments into one of two threads.
This one and this AstroPulse errors - Reporting which is "Stickied" to the top of the thread.
Yes I know that means links posted to some messages are now incorrect.

It makes is easier for Josh and Eric to review one or two threads for issues.

Regards

Please consider a Donation to the Seti Project.

ID: 795171 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 795536 - Posted: 10 Aug 2008, 6:13:37 UTC - in response to Message 795100.  

I would say double that as my T7200(2.0 GHz) is running toward 80 hours.

If so, it looks like the AstroPulse application for the MAC is a bit slower than the stock Linux and Windows x86 applications are. My T7200 (2.0GHz) needed ca. 61 hours for its first AP wu (wuid 310110487).
That is exactly the same timerange i have seen during beta testing.


I think part of that is you have more cache on yours that I do on mine, possibly a faster bus as well. I have 1 MB cache and a 800 MHz bus.

ID: 795536 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 795538 - Posted: 10 Aug 2008, 6:14:44 UTC - in response to Message 795536.  

I would say double that as my T7200(2.0 GHz) is running toward 80 hours.

If so, it looks like the AstroPulse application for the MAC is a bit slower than the stock Linux and Windows x86 applications are. My T7200 (2.0GHz) needed ca. 61 hours for its first AP wu (wuid 310110487).
That is exactly the same timerange i have seen during beta testing.


I think part of that is you have more cache on yours that I do on mine, possibly a faster bus as well. I have 1 MB cache and a 800 MHz bus.

I have a 10 day cache and just stepped under the bus......LOL.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 795538 · Report as offensive
HTH
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 00
Posts: 691
Credit: 909,237
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 795541 - Posted: 10 Aug 2008, 6:18:41 UTC - in response to Message 792734.  

Thanks to Henri for postings on modifying app_info and to Josef for the hint to check the sched request file.
After waiting about 4 days -- I got my first AP unit - woohoo! Looks like 70+ hours for a desktop slogger like me. It certainly reduces the number of WUs in the task tab.


No problem, Dr.Argentum. :)

Is all working well?

Henri.

Manned mission to Mars in 2019 Petition <-- Sign this, please.
ID: 795541 · Report as offensive
Urs Echternacht
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 692
Credit: 135,197,781
RAC: 211
Germany
Message 795621 - Posted: 10 Aug 2008, 11:14:08 UTC - in response to Message 795536.  

I think part of that is you have more cache on yours that I do on mine, possibly a faster bus as well. I have 1 MB cache and a 800 MHz bus.

I hope your joking, our both processors are from the same type, share Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6 and the L2 cache is part of the processor (BOINC shows the correct value on Linux but other OS's don't, old bug).
The FSB is 167MHz x4 = 667 on mine, and it should be the same on yours, if you don't overclock.
_\|/_
U r s
ID: 795621 · Report as offensive
Profile X-Files 27
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 104
Credit: 111,191,433
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 795754 - Posted: 10 Aug 2008, 16:11:33 UTC

My first AP WU is being crunched.

CPU:Q9450 @ 3.72
Percent completed: 25.445%
Hours: 6hrs 22 mins
Remaining hours to complete: 8hrs 50mins

ID: 795754 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 795784 - Posted: 10 Aug 2008, 17:06:53 UTC - in response to Message 795621.  

I think part of that is you have more cache on yours that I do on mine, possibly a faster bus as well. I have 1 MB cache and a 800 MHz bus.

I hope your joking, our both processors are from the same type, share Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6 and the L2 cache is part of the processor (BOINC shows the correct value on Linux but other OS's don't, old bug).
The FSB is 167MHz x4 = 667 on mine, and it should be the same on yours, if you don't overclock.


I had to go check my specs and you are right I actually have the 4 MB and 667.


ID: 795784 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 796254 - Posted: 11 Aug 2008, 10:29:22 UTC - in response to Message 795754.  

My first AP WU is being crunched.

CPU:Q9450 @ 3.72
Percent completed: 25.445%
Hours: 6hrs 22 mins
Remaining hours to complete: 8hrs 50mins

Just for comparison, my Q9450 is running @ 3.56 and I have 5 AP WU's currently waiting to upload all of which took between 25hrs 32mins and 25hrs 45mins to complete.

F.
ID: 796254 · Report as offensive
Profile X-Files 27
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 104
Credit: 111,191,433
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 796319 - Posted: 11 Aug 2008, 15:02:12 UTC - in response to Message 796254.  

My first AP WU is being crunched.

CPU:Q9450 @ 3.72
Percent completed: 25.445%
Hours: 6hrs 22 mins
Remaining hours to complete: 8hrs 50mins

Just for comparison, my Q9450 is running @ 3.56 and I have 5 AP WU's currently waiting to upload all of which took between 25hrs 32mins and 25hrs 45mins to complete.

F.


BOINC estimate is a bit of optimistic. It finished at 26hrs and 11 mins. It took a bit longer than yours as this is rig is my primary pc for gaming, browsing, etc.

ID: 796319 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 796328 - Posted: 11 Aug 2008, 15:29:14 UTC - in response to Message 796319.  


BOINC estimate is a bit of optimistic. It finished at 26hrs and 11 mins. It took a bit longer than yours as this is rig is my primary pc for gaming, browsing, etc.

Primary rig?? My Q9450 is my only rig other the lappie that I use for work purposes (occasionally crunches Beta) so this is used for everything as well as crunching.

F.
ID: 796328 · Report as offensive
Profile Dave Sedgwick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 28
Credit: 1,700,859
RAC: 0
United States
Message 796651 - Posted: 12 Aug 2008, 4:54:27 UTC

just got my first AP unit! it's a bout a day plus down in my queue, if it goes by the order in the BOINC window. estimated time, 47:16:32. we shall see what my 1.8 2 gig 24/7 iMac G5 can do. giddy up!

Sedge
if by chance an honest man like yourself were to make enemies, they would become my enemies. and then they will fear you.
ID: 796651 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 796824 - Posted: 12 Aug 2008, 15:24:10 UTC - in response to Message 796651.  

just got my first AP unit! it's a bout a day plus down in my queue, if it goes by the order in the BOINC window. estimated time, 47:16:32. we shall see what my 1.8 2 gig 24/7 iMac G5 can do. giddy up!

Sedge


My take would be to say 120 hours, as my iMac took 81.

ID: 796824 · Report as offensive
Profile Dave Sedgwick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 28
Credit: 1,700,859
RAC: 0
United States
Message 796908 - Posted: 12 Aug 2008, 22:42:33 UTC

ok...on my last seti unit now, so should be starting the AP one in bout 2.8 hours. this could compel me to finally get that dual 3.2 quad core, 32 gig/ram Mac Pro i have been dreaming about. :)
if by chance an honest man like yourself were to make enemies, they would become my enemies. and then they will fear you.
ID: 796908 · Report as offensive
Profile Dave Sedgwick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 28
Credit: 1,700,859
RAC: 0
United States
Message 798001 - Posted: 14 Aug 2008, 21:54:58 UTC

well - i am at 10.122% after 37 hours 18 minutes. so, i think i need to stick to seti units. darn.
if by chance an honest man like yourself were to make enemies, they would become my enemies. and then they will fear you.
ID: 798001 · Report as offensive
Profile JDWhale
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 99
Posts: 921
Credit: 21,935,817
RAC: 3
United States
Message 798010 - Posted: 14 Aug 2008, 22:21:35 UTC - in response to Message 798001.  
Last modified: 14 Aug 2008, 22:23:34 UTC

well - i am at 10.122% after 37 hours 18 minutes. so, i think i need to stick to seti units. darn.


So you have about 2 weeks CPU time left... Plenty of time to beat the 11 Sep, deadline. Your RAC on that host will be ~48 if only crunching AP WUs(assuming standard 715 credits per AP WU). Quite a drop from present RAC of ~140 :-(
ID: 798010 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 798022 - Posted: 14 Aug 2008, 22:48:51 UTC

I decided to only run AP on my Dell as the iMac @81 hours was just too long for not much credit. Along with the fact that the AP app can crash if it tried to resume after being paused by other work.

The Dell does them in about 42 hours.

ID: 798022 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Astropulse - how to get it when using optimized SETI@home?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.