Please post - System, CPU, Bench score, WU compl. time

Author	Message
Benher Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Jul 99 Posts: 517 Credit: 465,152 RAC: 0	Message 29583 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 6:08:20 UTC Last modified: 24 Sep 2004, 20:21:17 UTC Please examine instructions: 1. Please review list of systems below. 2. If your system type is listed, and your numbers are close to listed ones, please do NOT list your system. 3. Please use format below for posting. 4. This thread is for results from Seti WU timings. Others may start different thread for other projects. Posting Format: O/S: [PCs operating system] Win2K CPU: [maker], [model], [speed] Intel, P4, 2400Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. No, 1, 1247, 3441, 4:04, 5:17 Legend: HT CPU = [hyperthreaded 2 CPU sys] No # CPU = [count of physical CPUs] 1 Whet = [Boinc 4.09 whetstone] Dhry = [Boinc 4.09 dhrystone] Actual = [Avg. time to finish WU per CPU] Estim. = [Boinc initial estimate] System Table: CPU Mhz O/S Actual Estim. Whet Dhry CPU ---- ----- --------- ----- ----- ----- ------ Athlon XP 1730 Win XP 3:40 4:58 1561 3584 1 Athlon XP 2365 Win XP pro 2:20 3:30 2188 5042 1 Athlon XP 2500+ Win 98se 2:53 4:10 1845 4248 1 Athlon XP 2600+ Win XP pro 3:43 3:55 1976 4564 1 Athlon XP 3000+ Win XP pro 2:50 4:20 1789 4084 1 Athlon XP 3200+ Win 98se 2:40 4:11 2064 4757 1 Duron 800 server 2K 9:22 10:22 748 1729 1 Duron 1762 win 2K 3:45 4:43 1638 3763 1 Duron mob 800 win 2K 8:52 11:10 694 1687 1 P2 Cel 500 Win 98se 14:30 18:04 429 1056 1 P3 500 Win 98se 12:30 18:31 422 1019 1 P4 1800 Win XP hom 4:56 8:26 919 2400 1 P4 2400 win XP 4:04 6:13 1247 3441 1 P4 3000 Win XP hom 2:46 4:56 1566 4217 1 P4 3200 Win XP hom 3:21 5:18 1469 2055 2 Pentium M 1800 Win XP pro 2:12 4:55 1574 4370 1 ID: 29583 ·

Obelix Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 5 Credit: 1,812,498 RAC: 0	Message 29588 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 6:51:00 UTC Last modified: 25 Sep 2004, 8:18:48 UTC O/S: Win XP Hom CPU: [maker], [model], [speed] AMD, Athlon XP, 1730 Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. No, 1, 1561, 3584, 3:40, 4:58 Boinc 4.09 ID: 29588 ·

TLupus Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3 Credit: 55,868 RAC: 0	Message 29590 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 7:06:08 UTC Last modified: 25 Sep 2004, 7:30:39 UTC Posting Format: Boinc 4.09 O/S: [PCs operating system] Win 98SE CPU: [maker], [model], [speed] AMD, Athlon XP, 2200 Mhz (+3200) HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. No, 1, 2064, 4757, 2:40, 3:45 Legend: HT CPU = [hyperthreaded 2 CPU sys] No # CPU = [count of physical CPUs] 1 Whet = [Boinc 4.09 whetstone] Dhry = [Boinc 4.09 dhrystone] Actual = [Avg. time to finish WU per CPU] Estim. = [Boinc initial estimate] Radio Sunnydale: Aly; i can't take my Eyes off You, in a virgin State of Mind :-( ID: 29590 ·

Steve Cressman Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Jun 02 Posts: 583 Credit: 65,644 RAC: 0	Message 29594 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 7:24:07 UTC Last modified: 25 Sep 2004, 6:32:30 UTC O/S: [PCs operating system] Win98SE CPU: [maker], [model], [speed] AMD, XP2500+, 1830Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. No, 1, 1845.66, 4248.61, 2:53, 4:10 Boinc 4.09 Application has reported a 'Not My Fault' in module KRNL.EXE in line 0200:103F ID: 29594 ·

ric Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Jun 03 Posts: 482 Credit: 666,047 RAC: 0	Message 29608 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 8:43:24 UTC - in response to Message 29594. <br /> CPU BENCHMARKS RESULTS BANK <br /> ID: 29608 ·

Saimek Send message Joined: 25 Jan 00 Posts: 121 Credit: 454,423 RAC: 0	Message 29615 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 9:46:02 UTC OS: WinXP Prof SP1 Cpu: AthlonXP 2000 1666@1875 Mhz FSB 300, DDR 256 2-3-3-6 Whet: 2296 Dhry: 4069 Actual: 3:55 Estim: 3:22 Os: WinXP Prof SP1 Cpu: PIII 800@955, FSB 142 Whet: 1178 Dhry: 2112 Actual: ~9 hrs Estim: ~10 Os: Linux 2.4.26 Cpu: Dual PIII 1 Ghz Whet: 526 Dhry: 1128 Actual: 2 WU's every 8:30 ID: 29615 ·

Benher Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Jul 99 Posts: 517 Credit: 465,152 RAC: 0	Message 29687 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 17:15:34 UTC Rich Riechmeister, > > CPU BENCHMARKS RESULTS BANK Thanks for info on other thread. I checked it out, unfortunately the last posting was before the 4.09 code was "official". And nobody seems to have posted their versions for boinc client. I am attempting to fix the estimation and credit request code with this information and 4.09 are the numbers I have to use. =Ben ID: 29687 ·

Nuwanda Send message Joined: 2 Aug 03 Posts: 71 Credit: 1,337,642 RAC: 0	Message 29720 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 18:06:24 UTC Last modified: 24 Sep 2004, 18:07:28 UTC O/S: WinXP Pro SP1a CPU: AMD, Athlon XP 3000+, 2167Mhz No, 1, 1789, 4084, 2:50, 4:20 ---------------------------- Team X-BTF S@H Forums S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club Â© member <img> ID: 29720 ·

StokeyBob Send message Joined: 31 Aug 03 Posts: 848 Credit: 2,218,691 RAC: 0	Message 29724 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 18:19:56 UTC - in response to Message 29583. Last modified: 24 Sep 2004, 19:30:02 UTC Posting Format: O/S: [PCs operating system] XP Home CPU: [maker], [model], [speed] Intel, P4, 3.2Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. yes, 1, 1469, 2055, 3:21, 5:18 Edit; 4.09 ID: 29724 ·

Heffed Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0	Message 29733 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 18:41:38 UTC Slapyos benchmark site... ID: 29733 ·

Benher Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Jul 99 Posts: 517 Credit: 465,152 RAC: 0	Message 29743 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 19:09:23 UTC - in response to Message 29687. Last modified: 24 Sep 2004, 19:15:05 UTC Thanks Heffed, For those interested in benchmark results only this is a great link. Slapyos, however, does not include seti WU completion times (estimated or actual). And only 2 people so far have specified 4.09 as their boinc client, several others claimed 4.05. Most specified 3.2 so they must be fairly out of date. I have not calculated a usefull formula to turn 4.05 or 3.2 benchmark results into 4.09. Probably since 4.09 is actually doing more CPU operations since the code correction. Even so, without seti WU completion times, I can't use the information to develop a better formula for WU completion estimates and proper credit. =Ben ID: 29743 ·

Robert J Send message Joined: 30 Mar 00 Posts: 115 Credit: 20,087,874 RAC: 15	Message 29751 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 19:31:40 UTC - in response to Message 29583. CPU Mhz O/S Actual Estim. Whet Dhry CPU ---- ----- --------- ----- ----- ----- ------ P3 500 win 98se 12:30 18:31 422 1019 1 Boinc client 4.09 ID: 29751 ·

BorisM Send message Joined: 31 Jul 03 Posts: 14 Credit: 1,888,005 RAC: 0	Message 29754 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 19:36:10 UTC OS: WinXP Pro SP2 CPU: AMD Athlon XP 2500+ @ 2365Mhz No, 1, 2188, 5042, 2:20, 3:30 b0r1s ID: 29754 ·

Pascal, K G Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0	Message 29755 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 19:36:49 UTC Last modified: 25 Sep 2004, 4:34:38 UTC Win XP sp2 Intel, P4, 3.0Mhz BOINC Ver # 4.09 HT CPU - yes # CPUs - 1 Whet - 1566 Dhry - 4217 Actual - 02:50:53 Estim.- 04:56:32 Win XP sp2 Intel, P4, 1.8Mhz BOINC Ver # 4.09 HT CPU - No # CPUs - 1 Whet - 919 Dhry - 2400 Actual - 04:56:12 Estim.- 08:26:18 My name is Pascal and this message has my approval... It is 10 oclock, do you know what your WUWUs are doing tonight... ID: 29755 ·

cubamichi Send message Joined: 26 Jul 99 Posts: 8 Credit: 907,392 RAC: 0	Message 29757 - Posted: 24 Sep 2004, 20:03:50 UTC AMD Duron 1400 at 1762 Win 2K SP4 2004-09-24 22:01:37 [---] Benchmark results: 2004-09-24 22:01:37 [---] Number of CPUs: 1 2004-09-24 22:01:37 [---] 1638 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 2004-09-24 22:01:37 [---] 3763 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 2004-09-24 22:01:37 [---] Finished CPU benchmarks Boinc 4.09 estimated time: 4:43:03 usual completion time: about 3:45 ID: 29757 ·

Venus & Mars Send message Joined: 15 Jan 04 Posts: 56 Credit: 403,416 RAC: 0	Message 29842 - Posted: 25 Sep 2004, 0:20:07 UTC - in response to Message 29583. All with BOINC 4.09 and NO overclocking. O/S: WinXP Home SP2 CPU: Intel, P4 533, 2400Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. No, 1, 1276, 3429, 4:18, 6:05 O/S: WinXP Home SP2 CPU: Intel, P4 533, 3060Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. Yes, 1, 1363, 1853, 3:45, 5:41 O/S: WinME CPU: Intel, P3, 1100Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. No, 1, 980, 2422, 7:05, 7:54 O/S: WinXP Home SP1 CPU: Intel, P4 800, 2600Mhz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. Yes, 1, 1072, 1532, 4:45, 7:14 ID: 29842 ·

xi3piscium Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 99 Posts: 287 Credit: 26,674 RAC: 0	Message 29857 - Posted: 25 Sep 2004, 1:06:08 UTC Last modified: 25 Sep 2004, 1:09:56 UTC Boinc 4.09 O/S: Fedora Core 1 Linux 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl CPU: Intel , Celeron, 1.7Ghz HT CPU No # CPUs 1 Whet 453 Dhry 1393 Actual 6:00 Estim. 5:33 ID: 29857 ·

Heffed Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0	Message 29906 - Posted: 25 Sep 2004, 6:43:18 UTC Posting Format: O/S: XP Pro SP1 CPU: AMD FX-53 2.4GHz HT CPU # CPUs Whet Dhry Actual Estim. No, 1, 2305, 6082, 1:57, 3:21 ID: 29906 ·

TLupus Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3 Credit: 55,868 RAC: 0	Message 29912 - Posted: 25 Sep 2004, 7:34:06 UTC - in response to Message 29743. > And only 2 people so far have specified 4.09 as their boinc client, several > others claimed 4.05. Most specified 3.2 so they must be fairly out of date. > > I have not calculated a usefull formula to turn 4.05 or 3.2 benchmark results > into 4.09. Probably since 4.09 is actually doing more CPU operations since > the code correction. > > Even so, without seti WU completion times, I can't use the information to > develop a better formula for WU completion estimates and proper credit. I have updated my post. Radio Sunnydale: Aly; i can't take my Eyes off You, in a virgin State of Mind :-( ID: 29912 ·

Zeeno Send message Joined: 19 May 00 Posts: 20 Credit: 75,268 RAC: 0	Message 30269 - Posted: 26 Sep 2004, 12:26:50 UTC Last modified: 26 Sep 2004, 12:40:02 UTC Most of the info here with the exception of the completion times (which can vary anyhow) and client version can be found here: http://www.noggintech.com/boincinfo Enjoy... ID: 30269 ·

©2026 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.