Message boards :
Number crunching :
Computation Error - Bad Workunit Header
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8
Author | Message |
---|---|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Just a heads-up: it looks like they've been splitting 13fe08ac again (although I didn't notice it on the server status page, again). This time, they seem to have got it right - I bumped mine up to the head of the queue and it's running OK so far(10%). So if you see 13fe08ac in your list, please don't just abort it unthinkingly. Look at the full task name - if it ends _0 or _1, it's ones of the new ones on their first release, and it should be OK. If it ends _5 or _6, it's been round the block a few times and it's on its last legs - kindest to put it out of its misery. Anything in between - check and decide! |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Just a heads-up: it looks like they've been splitting 13fe08ac again (although I didn't notice it on the server status page, again). This time, they seem to have got it right - I bumped mine up to the head of the queue and it's running OK so far(10%). Thanks for the heads up. I've got one of the new ones ending in-0. Hope it runs ok. PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65709 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Just a heads-up: it looks like they've been splitting 13fe08ac again (although I didn't notice it on the server status page, again). This time, they seem to have got it right - I bumped mine up to the head of the queue and it's running OK so far(10%). Nope don't have any so far, If I see any with a 0 or 1, I'll leave It be. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19013 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Just looked at my quad and have got four, the first wuid=239468626 13fe08ac.1259.2117.3.7.44_1 was issued at 20 Mar 2008 20:14:50 UTC. |
Fred W Send message Joined: 13 Jun 99 Posts: 2524 Credit: 11,954,210 RAC: 0 |
Just a heads-up: it looks like they've been splitting 13fe08ac again (although I didn't notice it on the server status page, again). This time, they seem to have got it right - I bumped mine up to the head of the queue and it's running OK so far(10%). Quick note to anyone who took up the offer of the .bat file that I published: That script looks for the error condition, not just at the file name, so it won't highlight any of the new 13fe08ac's if they do not contain the error condition. I.e. it is still a valid test for bad WU's (I have aborted only those identified by the script and have not had a single failure of a 13fe08ac). F. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Just looked at my quad and have got four, the first wuid=239468626 13fe08ac.1259.2117.3.7.44_1 was issued at 20 Mar 2008 20:14:50 UTC. That's about six minutes before I got mine. Now at 88% and crunching, but I've got to go out so I won't see it finish. It should report itself within half-an-hour, and y'all will be able to see the result for yourselves - that's one of the benefits of still having v5.10.13 on that machine! |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65709 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Well I do have plenty of the aforementioned files(2, 3 & 10 or 15 total), But the script on each PC says that It can't find any bad ones, So I'm not worried. Oh and a slightly belated thanks for the info on what the script does. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.