AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
29.234secs
no o/c

My 4600+ ran in 34.656 with a 3% OC.

My laptop with a Core Duo T2300 ran it in 36.204 seconds.

---

Daniel

Hyper PI, which can be found here, loads a selectable number of cores by running that number of super pi's. On my machine the laptop t2300 that ran one instance in 36.2 seconds, when both cores were loaded it took 40.5 seconds for one and 40.7 for the other.

---

Daniel

Hyper PI, which can be found here, loads a selectable number of cores by running that number of super pi's. On my machine the laptop t2300 that ran one instance in 36.2 seconds, when both cores were loaded it took 40.5 seconds for one and 40.7 for the other.

Now this version loads all 4 cores....
Got 11.485 on one core and 11.672 on another (that was probably the core that was also running task manager which I was watching the cpu usage on).

---

"Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."

My core 2 5250 got 41.6 on both cores.

My core 2 6600 ocd at 3.2 scored 15.922

---

11.891 seconds on 3.9ghz X9650. About where I expected it would be, given msattler's 4.6ghz result

---

Athlon XP 3200+ -> 46.687s

---

"Gentlemen, there are only two types of naval vessels..........Submarines, and Targets" -- U.S. Navy Submarine SONAR Instructor.

And on the low end of the scale ('til my E8400 Arrives... )

P4 Northwood 2.0 @2.1 : 1M superPi in 1 min 32.765 seconds... (making msattler's Penryn ~9.2 times faster)

LOL handy program to have if your work involves a lot of really accurate circles :D

And for comparison purposes:

Athlon 64 3700+ (San Diego) @ 2.75 : 1M superPi in 30.687 seconds

Intel PD 940 @ 3.20 : 1M superPi in 41.282 seconds

14s Q6600 B3 G0 3.52GHZ . 25% CPU load spread on all cores.

:)

Just curious....
I had not done a Super PI run on my Penny rig until just now.....I think I used to do a 1M run in about 14-15 seconds on my X6800 rig when it was at it's fastest.

The phased Penny did the 1M Super PI in 10.125 seconds at 4.6ghz......that's pretty smokin', but surely no world record.

If I am not mistaken, the Super PI test uses a lot of floating point ops, as does much of Seti crunching. What are some of your scores?

You can download the Super PI mod app at xtremesystems.com if you are interested.........
Shut down Boinc/Seti and any other tasks before you run it so your computer can devote all it's resources to the test run to get a valid result. It will run along with other tasks, but if it is competing for system resources during the run, your time will be slower.
The 1M run is what most OCers use as a benchmark.

I think the world record right now is 7.453 seconds on a QX9650 OCd to a little over 6ghz. Ouch.

While you're on xtremsystems... compare your rig to the fastest Penryn on the planet ... as far as i know it's running at 4.8 GHz vapochilled.

how much slower is your rig compared to the fastest in the world ?

---

Join BOINC United now!

While you're on xtremsystems... compare your rig to the fastest Penryn on the planet ... as far as i know it's running at 4.8 GHz vapochilled.

how much slower is your rig compared to the fastest in the world ?

Well....I am at 4.6ghz....found a thread on xtremesystems from a guy getting up to 5.9ghz on LN2 cooling, with a 1M super pi of 7.859 seconds.........of course there is no way he could maintain that speed with all 4 cores crunching Seti...

I may play a bit tomorrow and see what I can come up with....
Fact of the matter is that I probably could ramp up and boot with a higher speed that I am at now, and might be able to get a faster super pi run in before the thing crashes, but 4.6ghz seems to be about the limit before Seti starts to throw errors.

---

"Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."

I'm talking about stable (like running seti) vapochill mods... The most stable thing i could found was 4.8 GHz.... sure there might be more possible but not 24/h stable ...

---

Join BOINC United now!

Q6600 runnning at 3.006 GHz, but with pretty slow RAM timings

17.656 seconds

---

Checked my slow machine for kicks:

P3 1.0ghz, 347mb of RAM, 1M SuperPi in 3 minutes 34.288 seconds

---

Daniel

AMD x2 6000+ no-oc : 27.266 (checksum: 96884781)

---

Checked my slow machine for kicks:

P3 1.0ghz, 347mb of RAM, 1M SuperPi in 3 minutes 34.288 seconds

LOL...now that's what I call a plodder....

---

"Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."

Checked my slow machine for kicks:

P3 1.0ghz, 347mb of RAM, 1M SuperPi in 3 minutes 34.288 seconds

LOL...now that's what I call a plodder....

Well its no phased quddy, but it was my first dedicated crunching box, so it will always be special, no matter how long it takes to run WU's.

---

Daniel

Checked my slow machine for kicks:

P3 1.0ghz, 347mb of RAM, 1M SuperPi in 3 minutes 34.288 seconds

LOL...now that's what I call a plodder....

Well its no phased quddy, but it was my first dedicated crunching box, so it will always be special, no matter how long it takes to run WU's.

I hear ya....no time soon, but some day I may power up my old 233mmx again just to see what it would do....the first computer I ever owned, built from scratch, and my first feeble attempts at OCing...which amounted to resetting a dip switch on the mobo to gain a few mhz. And I seem to remember upgrading a cache chip on the mobo...
Man, that was a long time ago. It would take about 20 of those rigs to equal the crunching output of the Penny..LOL.

---

"Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."