Super PI scores...........


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Super PI scores...........
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

AuthorMessage
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 701442 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 10:12:14 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jan 2008, 10:23:00 UTC

Just curious....
I had not done a Super PI run on my Penny rig until just now.....I think I used to do a 1M run in about 14-15 seconds on my X6800 rig when it was at it's fastest.

The phased Penny did the 1M Super PI in 10.125 seconds at 4.6ghz......that's pretty smokin', but surely no world record.

If I am not mistaken, the Super PI test uses a lot of floating point ops, as does much of Seti crunching. What are some of your scores?

You can download the Super PI mod app at xtremesystems.com if you are interested.........
Shut down Boinc/Seti and any other tasks before you run it so your computer can devote all it's resources to the test run to get a valid result. It will run along with other tasks, but if it is competing for system resources during the run, your time will be slower.
The 1M run is what most OCers use as a benchmark.

I think the world record right now is 7.453 seconds on a QX9650 OCd to a little over 6ghz. Ouch.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 701442 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 701450 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 11:08:23 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jan 2008, 11:09:57 UTC

And on the low end of the scale ('til my E8400 Arrives... )

P4 Northwood 2.0 @2.1 : 1M superPi in 1 min 32.765 seconds... (making msattler's Penryn ~9.2 times faster)

LOL handy program to have if your work involves a lot of really accurate circles :D
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 701450 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 701456 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 11:41:02 UTC - in response to Message 701450.  
Last modified: 19 Jan 2008, 11:41:15 UTC

And on the low end of the scale ('til my E8400 Arrives... )

P4 Northwood 2.0 @2.1 : 1M superPi in 1 min 32.765 seconds... (making msattler's Penryn ~9.2 times faster)

LOL handy program to have if your work involves a lot of really accurate circles :D

LOL....I run around in circles a lot......
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 701456 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19057
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 701465 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 12:51:10 UTC

On a Pent M 1.86GHz 01:42
ID: 701465 · Report as offensive
Urs Echternacht
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 692
Credit: 135,197,781
RAC: 211
Germany
Message 701466 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 13:00:34 UTC

So my 01:28 are not bad for a Pentium III@ 1.63GHz
_\|/_
U r s
ID: 701466 · Report as offensive
JAMC
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 07
Posts: 71
Credit: 9,521,522
RAC: 0
Message 701469 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 13:46:28 UTC

Q6600 B3 @ 3.0 = 17.172 s
hmmm... I need to shave off about 10 seconds :)
ID: 701469 · Report as offensive
Profile John Clark
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 99
Posts: 16515
Credit: 4,418,829
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 701474 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 14:36:52 UTC

It is interesting using the PI programe to compare technology over the last 8 years.

My dual P3 RAID+1 server runs the programme in 2 mins 10.937 seconds (130.937s). This rig is 7 or more years old.

My dual Prestonia Xeon server runs the same in 57.250 seconds, and is 4.5 years old.

My QX6,700 Quad runs it in 17.140 seconds, and is coming up to 1 year old.

Finally, my QX9,650 runs it in 12.547 seconds and is coming up to 3 days old.

It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues



ID: 701474 · Report as offensive
Profile Dr. C.E.T.I.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 00
Posts: 16019
Credit: 794,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 701478 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 14:48:23 UTC - in response to Message 701474.  

It is interesting using the PI programe to compare technology over the last 8 years.

My dual P3 RAID+1 server runs the programme in 2 mins 10.937 seconds (130.937s). This rig is 7 or more years old.

My dual Prestonia Xeon server runs the same in 57.250 seconds, and is 4.5 years old.

My QX6,700 Quad runs it in 17.140 seconds, and is coming up to 1 year old.

Finally, my QX9,650 runs it in 12.547 seconds and is coming up to 3 days old.



nice JC, real nice . . . ;)

BOINC Wiki . . .

Science Status Page . . .
ID: 701478 · Report as offensive
Profile dnolan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 01
Posts: 1228
Credit: 47,779,411
RAC: 32
United States
Message 701479 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 14:51:14 UTC


Just tried it on one of my Q6600s, 16.42s. That was on the G0 one, not bad I think.

-Dave
ID: 701479 · Report as offensive
Profile John Clark
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 99
Posts: 16515
Credit: 4,418,829
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 701481 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 15:02:28 UTC - in response to Message 701479.  


Just tried it on one of my Q6600s, 16.42s. That was on the G0 one, not bad I think.

-Dave



Not bad at all, and the best combo bang for buck even now
It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues



ID: 701481 · Report as offensive
Dissident
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 May 99
Posts: 132
Credit: 70,320
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 701484 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 15:28:31 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jan 2008, 15:31:52 UTC

My 4400+ X2 ticked the tock in 38.672 seconds. I was pleasantly surprised it did well for a 3 year old proc.
ID: 701484 · Report as offensive
Andre Howard
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 124
Credit: 217,463,217
RAC: 0
United States
Message 701485 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 15:33:56 UTC

21.14 sec Q6600 go step no overclock

ID: 701485 · Report as offensive
Filipe

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 00
Posts: 218
Credit: 21,281,677
RAC: 20
Portugal
Message 701493 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 16:11:06 UTC

22s om my E2180 overcloked to 2.66Ghz
ID: 701493 · Report as offensive
Profile Voyager
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Nov 99
Posts: 602
Credit: 3,264,813
RAC: 0
United States
Message 701513 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 16:59:38 UTC

16.360 on q6600 @3156
41.797 on pd 920@3220
ID: 701513 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 701517 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 17:12:02 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jan 2008, 17:14:01 UTC

AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
29.234secs
no o/c

ID: 701517 · Report as offensive
ChrisD
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 99
Posts: 158
Credit: 2,496,342
RAC: 0
Denmark
Message 701524 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 17:32:39 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jan 2008, 17:33:15 UTC

29.75 s on a Phenom 9500, but hey this process uses only 25% of the CPU power ???

ChrisD
ID: 701524 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 701530 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 17:52:27 UTC - in response to Message 701524.  

29.75 s on a Phenom 9500, but hey this process uses only 25% of the CPU power ???

ChrisD

Hmmmm...very curious. I just did another run on the Penny, and I saw exactly the same thing.....25% cpu usage. 10.141 seconds.....
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 701530 · Report as offensive
Filipe

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 00
Posts: 218
Credit: 21,281,677
RAC: 20
Portugal
Message 701537 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 18:14:37 UTC

it`s because super pi run on only one core; even on quadcore cpu`s
ID: 701537 · Report as offensive
Profile RandyC
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 99
Posts: 714
Credit: 1,704,345
RAC: 0
United States
Message 701538 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 18:19:05 UTC - in response to Message 701456.  


LOL....I run around in circles a lot......


"When in danger or in doubt: run in circles-scream and shout!"
ID: 701538 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 701539 - Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 18:23:26 UTC - in response to Message 701537.  
Last modified: 19 Jan 2008, 18:47:20 UTC

it`s because super pi run on only one core; even on quadcore cpu`s

Not so......
Task manager shows only using 25% of one core.....not 25% of the total....the one core that is running is only at 25% usage....
I'm gonna search a bit more....I think I saw a reference last night to a version of Super PI that ran on more than one core....I'll get back to y'all on that.


Oh, silly me.....you were right......25% of the total, 100% on that one core...
Sorry for my stupid oversight.....
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 701539 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Super PI scores...........


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.