Stats page change?!?!

Message boards : Number crunching : Stats page change?!?!
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Osiris30

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 07
Posts: 264
Credit: 41,917,631
RAC: 0
Barbados
Message 652866 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 15:33:29 UTC

It would appear the stats page just changed from supporting floating point numbers to integer numbers only.

On my page alone that nicked me 73 total credits. Does anyone know if this is a display only change or is this a backend change meaning all my 54.xx WUs will only credit 54.00 now?

ID: 652866 · Report as offensive
Profile Helsionium
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 06
Posts: 156
Credit: 86,214,817
RAC: 43
Austria
Message 652872 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 15:41:53 UTC - in response to Message 652866.  

I can confirm this, but the change only affects the stats display, the correct values are still stored - click on any result to see how much credit you really got (or will get).

ID: 652872 · Report as offensive
Osiris30

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 07
Posts: 264
Credit: 41,917,631
RAC: 0
Barbados
Message 652873 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 15:43:56 UTC - in response to Message 652872.  

I can confirm this, but the change only affects the stats display, the correct values are still stored - click on any result to see how much credit you really got (or will get).


Well good to know I'm not going insane.. I don't like unannounced changes like that. (That's the Admin in me :P ) Also good to hear it's cosmetic in nature only. I really like the old way better. Now, if this change is going to make the load easier on the DB servers then I don't mind, but otherwise I would prefer the 2 points of precision.
ID: 652873 · Report as offensive
Profile Pilot
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 652874 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 15:46:41 UTC - in response to Message 652866.  

It would appear the stats page just changed from supporting floating point numbers to integer numbers only.

On my page alone that nicked me 73 total credits. Does anyone know if this is a display only change or is this a backend change meaning all my 54.xx WUs will only credit 54.00 now?


I suppose they are trying to save ink. You know how important it is to economize these days;)
However I would guess that they carry a lot more decimal points than they display, and all will continue to recieve the same credit as before.
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.
ID: 652874 · Report as offensive
Osiris30

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 07
Posts: 264
Credit: 41,917,631
RAC: 0
Barbados
Message 652877 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 15:54:50 UTC - in response to Message 652874.  

It would appear the stats page just changed from supporting floating point numbers to integer numbers only.

On my page alone that nicked me 73 total credits. Does anyone know if this is a display only change or is this a backend change meaning all my 54.xx WUs will only credit 54.00 now?


I suppose they are trying to save ink. You know how important it is to economize these days;)
However I would guess that they carry a lot more decimal points than they display, and all will continue to recieve the same credit as before.


Ya, but the text was actually black, and since monitors are ligth emitting devices more black actually would conserve more ;)
ID: 652877 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 652880 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 15:57:29 UTC - in response to Message 652874.  

It would appear the stats page just changed from supporting floating point numbers to integer numbers only.

On my page alone that nicked me 73 total credits. Does anyone know if this is a display only change or is this a backend change meaning all my 54.xx WUs will only credit 54.00 now?


I suppose they are trying to save ink. You know how important it is to economize these days;)
However I would guess that they carry a lot more decimal points than they display, and all will continue to receive the same credit as before.

Ink? What Ink? The stats don't use ink at all as their online, hello....
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 652880 · Report as offensive
Profile Pilot
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 652884 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 16:08:16 UTC - in response to Message 652880.  

It would appear the stats page just changed from supporting floating point numbers to integer numbers only.

On my page alone that nicked me 73 total credits. Does anyone know if this is a display only change or is this a backend change meaning all my 54.xx WUs will only credit 54.00 now?


I suppose they are trying to save ink. You know how important it is to economize these days;)
However I would guess that they carry a lot more decimal points than they display, and all will continue to receive the same credit as before.

Ink? What Ink? The stats don't use ink at all as their online, hello....

Oh My God!!! you mean they don't squirt ink down the pipes and over the ethernet? I always thought the ether was there to keep the ink from drying out enroute! I guess it's why my used bit bucket never fills up.
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.
ID: 652884 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde C. Phillips, III

Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 00
Posts: 1851
Credit: 5,955,047
RAC: 0
United States
Message 652885 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 16:12:03 UTC

Yes, I see that now RAC and total credit are given in integers, not to the nearest 100th. That's OK with me. That's exact enough and removes a little clutter. I also see a "Preview" option on these forums. Maybe if I use those hotmetal codes?.....
ID: 652885 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 652949 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 22:05:52 UTC

I liked It the way It was on the Stats, More Exact, Not rounded off to the nearest whole number. On the Message part, The Preview part is very welcome though, But I'm just a user, So I'll just keep crunching away.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 652949 · Report as offensive
Profile Suzuki
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 01
Posts: 318
Credit: 4,474,402
RAC: 1
United Kingdom
Message 652958 - Posted: 2 Oct 2007, 22:13:54 UTC - in response to Message 652877.  



Ya, but the text was actually black, and since monitors are ligth emitting devices more black actually would conserve more ;)


Google got wise to this so, for the energy conscious Google users amongst us, myself included, try this!

Cheers,

Steve

ID: 652958 · Report as offensive
Profile dbrinza
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 May 99
Posts: 60
Credit: 16,887,043
RAC: 269
United States
Message 653067 - Posted: 3 Oct 2007, 0:05:41 UTC

It appears that the credits are shown as integers in the "Your Account", "Results for Users", "Pending credits", and "Work unit ID" pages, but the "Result ID" page shows the full precision of claimed and granted credits.

The integer results are in fact rounded and not merely truncated, so no need to worry about losing "credit change".

ID: 653067 · Report as offensive
Osiris30

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 07
Posts: 264
Credit: 41,917,631
RAC: 0
Barbados
Message 653069 - Posted: 3 Oct 2007, 0:07:55 UTC - in response to Message 653067.  

It appears that the credits are shown as integers in the "Your Account", "Results for Users", "Pending credits", and "Work unit ID" pages, but the "Result ID" page shows the full precision of claimed and granted credits.

The integer results are in fact rounded and not merely truncated, so no need to worry about losing "credit change".


Ya, maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I liked 2 digits of precision after the decimal. This just feels wrong now :/

ID: 653069 · Report as offensive
NewtonianRefractor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 04
Posts: 495
Credit: 225,412
RAC: 0
United States
Message 653086 - Posted: 3 Oct 2007, 0:43:03 UTC - in response to Message 653069.  

It appears that the credits are shown as integers in the "Your Account", "Results for Users", "Pending credits", and "Work unit ID" pages, but the "Result ID" page shows the full precision of claimed and granted credits.

The integer results are in fact rounded and not merely truncated, so no need to worry about losing "credit change".


Ya, maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I liked 2 digits of precision after the decimal. This just feels wrong now :/


I have to agree...

ID: 653086 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde C. Phillips, III

Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 00
Posts: 1851
Credit: 5,955,047
RAC: 0
United States
Message 653491 - Posted: 3 Oct 2007, 17:45:30 UTC

For individual workunits I think they should still state credit to two decimal places. But for RAC and number of seconds, the nearest integer seems close enough.
ID: 653491 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 653496 - Posted: 3 Oct 2007, 17:54:41 UTC

I'm not crazy about this change either, But in any case If It doesn't change It's just something else to get used to.

Mark Me as ...
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 653496 · Report as offensive
DigitalCGD
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 May 99
Posts: 32
Credit: 1,396,590
RAC: 0
United States
Message 654080 - Posted: 4 Oct 2007, 18:06:55 UTC

i like having the cents after the dollars

it makes me feel better

how would you like it if some one owed you $54.75 and said here is what i owe you and handed you $54
ID: 654080 · Report as offensive
Niteryder
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 22,663,988
RAC: 18
United States
Message 654082 - Posted: 4 Oct 2007, 18:08:28 UTC
Last modified: 4 Oct 2007, 18:09:08 UTC

You would like it. $54.75 = $55
ID: 654082 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 654085 - Posted: 4 Oct 2007, 18:19:08 UTC - in response to Message 654082.  
Last modified: 4 Oct 2007, 18:20:44 UTC

You would like it. $54.75 = $55


LOL...

Agreed, the downside though is when the accumulated rounding ends up having the individual totals a buck higher than the account total, and thus every so often gives the impression of 'ripping you off' for a buck. ;-)

Of course I haven't found a way to get the power company to accept cobblestones to offset part of my bill, and it hasn't proven to be much of an extra effort from a data logging POV yet, so I'm not getting too worked about it. :-D

OTOH, if someone wants to compensate me with new hardware of something of that nature, I'll throw a full blown hissy fit over it! ;-)

Alinator
ID: 654085 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Stats page change?!?!


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.