allendale versus conroe

作者	消息
Ivailo Bonev 志愿者测试人员发送消息已加入：26 Jun 00 贴子：247 积分：35,864,461 近期平均积分：2	消息 637112 - 发表于：9 Sep 2007, 10:55:58 UTC - 回复消息 636987. 最近的修改日期：9 Sep 2007, 10:56:35 UTC should a E4300 (1.8ghz) allendale outperform a E6300 (1.86ghz) conroe? E4300 (2MB cache) runs at 800Mhz Front Side BUS (FSB). An E6300 runs at 1033MHz FSB and is also an Allendale (2MB cache). Conroe's start at C2D modelseries E6600 (4MB cache) and upwards. Google is your friend and you can use your threadtitle as searchstring ;-) Kiva That's incorrect. The E6xxx series are all Conroes. The E6300 simply has 2MB disabled. Note that not all Core 2s with 2MB cache are Allendales. Only Core 2s that have been manufactured with only 2MB of cache are Allendales. Also, the E6400 uses a 1066MHz FSB, not 1033MHz. Allendales are all E4xxx series chips. Careful of what you read on the net. Not all of it's true. Something to add, older E6300-E6400 with stepping B2 are Conroes with cutted 2MB cache, newer with L2 stepping are Allendales with somewhat worse OC, but Intel changed CPU-s with E6320-E6420 Conroes with fullhouse 4 MB cache. ID: 637112 ·

OzzFan 志愿者测试人员发送消息已加入：9 Apr 02 贴子：15687 积分：84,761,841 近期平均积分：28	消息 636987 - 发表于：9 Sep 2007, 3:03:53 UTC - 回复消息 636791. should a E4300 (1.8ghz) allendale outperform a E6300 (1.86ghz) conroe? E4300 (2MB cache) runs at 800Mhz Front Side BUS (FSB). An E6300 runs at 1033MHz FSB and is also an Allendale (2MB cache). Conroe's start at C2D modelseries E6600 (4MB cache) and upwards. Google is your friend and you can use your threadtitle as searchstring ;-) Kiva That's incorrect. The E6xxx series are all Conroes. The E6300 simply has 2MB disabled. Note that not all Core 2s with 2MB cache are Allendales. Only Core 2s that have been manufactured with only 2MB of cache are Allendales. Also, the E6400 uses a 1066MHz FSB, not 1033MHz. Allendales are all E4xxx series chips. Careful of what you read on the net. Not all of it's true. ID: 636987 ·

Kim Vater 志愿者测试人员发送消息已加入：27 May 99 贴子：227 积分：22,743,307 近期平均积分：0	消息 636791 - 发表于：8 Sep 2007, 21:27:40 UTC - 回复消息 636697. should a E4300 (1.8ghz) allendale outperform a E6300 (1.86ghz) conroe? E4300 (2MB cache) runs at 800Mhz Front Side BUS (FSB). An E6300 runs at 1033MHz FSB and is also an Allendale (2MB cache). Conroe's start at C2D modelseries E6600 (4MB cache) and upwards. Google is your friend and you can use your threadtitle as searchstring ;-) Kiva Greetings from Norway Crunch3er & AK-V8 Inside ID: 636791 ·

kittyman 志愿者测试人员发送消息已加入：9 Jul 00 贴子：50498 积分：1,018,363,574 近期平均积分：1,004	消息 636699 - 发表于：8 Sep 2007, 18:48:03 UTC - 回复消息 636697. should a E4300 (1.8ghz) allendale outperform a E6300 (1.86ghz) conroe? No, the E6300 has a higher FSB, and should perform slightly better, all things being equal. "Learn from yesterday. Live for today. Hope for tomorrow." Albert Einstein "With cats." kittyman ID: 636699 ·

nemesis 发送消息已加入：12 Oct 99 贴子：1408 积分：35,074,350 近期平均积分：0	消息 636697 - 发表于：8 Sep 2007, 18:44:38 UTC should a E4300 (1.8ghz) allendale outperform a E6300 (1.86ghz) conroe? ID: 636697 ·

©2020 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.