Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
Mars photos available on the Internet
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Tiare Rivera Send message Joined: 21 Apr 03 Posts: 270 Credit: 254,004 RAC: 0 |
Long time no see, here are some interesting news: Copyright, Science Daily: "TUCSON, June 6 (UPI) -- U.S. astronomers have released more than 1,200 high resolution images of Mars, making them available on the Internet. The University of Arizona-based team said anyone connected by Internet can see Mars better than at any time in history through the High Resolution Imaging Experiment, or HiRISE -- the most powerful camera to orbit another planet. The scientists operating the HiRISE camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance orbiter not only released 1.7 Terabytes of HiRISE data -- the largest single dataset delivered to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's space mission data library -- but also a user-friendly way for the public to easily see HiRISE images. The HiRISE camera takes images of 3.5-mile-wide swaths as the orbiter flies at about 7,800 mph between 155 and 196 miles above Mars' surface. For at least the next 18 months, HiRISE will collect thousands of color, black-and-white and stereo images of the Martian surface, resolving features as small as 40 inches across while covering about one percent of the planet. The images are available here Copyright 2007 by United Press International. All Rights Reserved." My photography world |
Andy Lee Robinson Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 630 Credit: 59,973,836 RAC: 0 |
|
Tiare Rivera Send message Joined: 21 Apr 03 Posts: 270 Credit: 254,004 RAC: 0 |
Covering just 1%??? Thank you very much for the correction, I haven't been here for 5 months, so I can notice the lack of practice. Tiare.- My photography world |
Andy Lee Robinson Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 630 Credit: 59,973,836 RAC: 0 |
You're welcome, and thanks very much for the link - the images and browser are great! I'm still waiting for Google to come out with a Mars version of GoogleEarth instead of the rather inferior flat thing they've got occupying http://mars.google.com! Andy |
Jason Safoutin Send message Joined: 8 Sep 05 Posts: 1386 Credit: 200,389 RAC: 0 |
You're welcome, and thanks very much for the link - the images and browser are great! Inferior? Its rather precise actually. "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 |
Andy Lee Robinson Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 630 Credit: 59,973,836 RAC: 0 |
Inferior? Its rather precise actually. Something can be precise and yet inferior! The maps are old, flat and not updated. No way of being able to fly through the Valles Marineris! Google Earth interface paradigm is excellent, all they have to do is replace the map data with the latest visual and topographic and use all the same code. It is easy for them to keep it updated as new data comes in. |
MeltWreckage Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 293 Credit: 15,951 RAC: 0 |
Inferior? Its rather precise actually. something I've always wanted to know: do you know if Google Earth provides accurate coordinates? or are they program-specific? in other words: could you use Google Earth coordinates in a real-world setting? that would have worked if you hadn't stopped me |
Andy Lee Robinson Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 630 Credit: 59,973,836 RAC: 0 |
do you know if Google Earth provides accurate coordinates? or are they program-specific? in other words: could you use Google Earth coordinates in a real-world setting? Yes, they are used in a real world setting every day. It is accurate to within a few metres, but it depends on what you define as accurate. Mathematically it is perfectly accurate, you can locate any point on the globe to a millimetre, but the question is how accurately are the maps and geometry placed on the sphere. There is distortion present in all images, which have to be stretched and corrected to fit. The amount of accuracy ultimately depends on what the humans deem acceptable. Topographic resolution is much much less than the image detail, but there is no reason why it can't get better. Data gathering, processing and storage of such huge datasets are a big problem for any organisation. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.