Message boards :
Technical News :
Oopsie (Apr 11 2007)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Iztok s52d (and friends) Send message Joined: 12 Jan 01 Posts: 136 Credit: 393,469,375 RAC: 116 |
Found the problem. My bad. Fixing now. Should clear up within minutes. Explanation later. Hi! 5 minutes ago: 2007-04-12 21:42:55 [SETI@home] Temporarily failed download of 22ap04ab.6123.28785.636084.3.165: error 404 2007-04-12 21:42:55 [SETI@home] Giving up on download of 22ap04ab.6123.28785.636084.3.165: file was not found on s 2007-04-12 21:42:55 [SETI@home] Giving up on download of 22ap04ab.6123.28785.636084.3.165: file was not found on s 2007-04-12 21:42:55 [SETI@home] Checksum or signature error for 22ap04ab.6123.28785.636084.3.165 2007-04-12 21:42:55 [SETI@home] Checksum or signature error for 22ap04ab.6123.28785.636084.3.165 2007-04-12 21:42:56 [SETI@home] Unrecoverable error for result 22ap04ab.6123.28785.636084.3.165_1 (WU download err <file_xfer_error> <file_name>22ap04ab.6123.28785.636084.3.165</file_name> <error_code>-163</error_code> <error_message>file was not found on server</error_message> </file_xfer_error> ) 73 Iztok |
rpas Send message Joined: 29 May 04 Posts: 11 Credit: 12,629,589 RAC: 0 |
Found the problem. My bad. Fixing now. Should clear up within minutes. Explanation later. I have had the same problem starting on the 11th, I am retired but have 8 hosts running, and have boincview running on one of the PC's sittin in front of me most of the day. I din't have the long queue of WU's so I have been doing a project reset to get new WU's as needed. I also worked Seti with the classic, and moved to boinc when it came about. Did not have the time to fiddle the problem on my end at the time and ceased doing Seti, till the last automated 'heya we miss ya come on back message from Seti. It might be a good idea to make sure this problem is not what the, new returnees see. I.E. seems to make sense to me to be sure this is not happening before sending out the emails. I know this 2 cents is not much of a donation, but hey. |
rpas Send message Joined: 29 May 04 Posts: 11 Credit: 12,629,589 RAC: 0 |
Found the problem. My bad. Fixing now. Should clear up within minutes. Explanation later. What I meant in the second paragraph is, same sort of problem happened to me a few years back and after a couple of days with no WU's, I just stopped running BOINC, till I got an email bout 6 or 7 months ago. So, just saying when no work units come in, folks might not stay around to long if they are newly returned to the projct. |
David S Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 18352 Credit: 27,761,924 RAC: 12 |
2007-04-12 19:40:07 [SETI@home] Checksum or signature error for 17dc04ab.28771.833.817310.3.52 I don't read this forum very often (no time), so forgive me if this has been dealt with elsewhere... A few weeks ago, I got rid of the old internet security package on one of my computers (named Steam) and suddenly found that *everything* ran much better (the old security, Panda Titanium, was hogging so much processor time for itself, a single Seti unit couldn't get done before its deadline). In particular, I started getting through more than 1 per day of Einstein units instead of several days each, so I decided to let the client start working on Seti again. I have yet to actually do a Seti unit on that computer. Every time it tries to download one, it gets the type of error quoted above. The first day, it happened 47 times in a row. The next day, 23 times. In a few days, the server had whittled my client's daily quota down to 1. I tried stopping and restarting BOINC, and I have restarted the computer after a Windows update, both with no effect on the Seti problem. I actually feel relief seeing that others are also getting checksum errors, but those others are still getting some WUs correctly, so what's my problem and what can I do to fix it (if anything)? David David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. |
Matt Lebofsky Send message Joined: 1 Mar 99 Posts: 1444 Credit: 957,058 RAC: 0 |
...same sort of problem happened to me a few years back and after a couple of days with no WU's, I just stopped running BOINC, till I got an email bout 6 or 7 months ago. So, just saying when no work units come in, folks might not stay around to long if they are newly returned to the projct. Understood. As it happens we haven't sent out any reminder e-mails yet. I'll wait until the problem fully clears up (in a couple hours). There's nothing we can do about the general behavior of BOINC which is that it will be down from time to time, or even fail. In most cases, it will eventually pick itself back up on its own, other times it needs to be kicked by the users to get going again. The internet community in general is still very novice about how networking software should work and how to troubleshoot, which is fair, but not really our fault. Still, this is our bread and butter so we'll do our best to coach people in the meantime and make sure the process is as easy and seamless as possible. - Matt -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude |
Arthur L. Smith Send message Joined: 17 Apr 02 Posts: 28 Credit: 244,050,922 RAC: 9 |
Found the problem. My bad. Fixing now. Should clear up within minutes. Explanation later. Thanks for your help, Matt. |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51492 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
> ...totally hosed the replica database... I took a quick look at a couple of your quaddies....... One appears to be running the stock client instead of the 2.2b core 2 Chicken app. That will slow it down quite a bit. The other appears to be running the Chicken app, but is running at stock speed, 2.66ghz. Mine is heavily OCd, been running between 3.4ghz and 3.8ghz depending on how well it is cooperating. And it appears that whatever Matt found and fixed has corrected the 'file not found' downloading problem. The couple of hundred that were hung up when I left for work earlier today have all since downloaded, except for 2 orphans, which I have now aborted. So I was correct in my earlier thoughts that aborting a couple of hundred WUs was not quite the right thing to do straight off. Thanx for the repair Matt, will be curious what the cause was when you have time to post an explanation. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
Justin M. Morford Send message Joined: 23 Sep 99 Posts: 36 Credit: 2,539,975 RAC: 0 |
...and it's a little bit of a pain to keep visiting all of these workstations... Not sure if you're aware of it, but if all or most of your machines are on the same network, you can access them all from Boinc Manager running on just one of them. On the "Advanced" menu choose "Select Computer..." and put in the computer name (I think IP address will work also) and the password for that computer. The password can be found (and edited) in a file named "gui_rpc_auth.cfg" in the main BOINC directory. Can't remember if this file is put there during install or if it's just a plain text file you have to create on your own. Justin |
Arthur L. Smith Send message Joined: 17 Apr 02 Posts: 28 Credit: 244,050,922 RAC: 9 |
> ...totally hosed the replica database... Thanks. I figured it had something to do with OCing. |
Chris Luth Send message Joined: 24 Dec 99 Posts: 21 Credit: 59,135 RAC: 0 |
...and it's a little bit of a pain to keep visiting all of these workstations... They don't even need to be on the same network (well, unless you consider the Internet one big network): I have four machines running, two of which are in geographically different areas (one in a different state--it belongs to some family of mine). As long as the machine is publicly accessible and the proper ports are forwarded through any NAT routers (1043 and 31416) and the gui_rpc_auth.cfg file password is set, the manager can connect to a BOINC instance anywhere in the world. |
Alinator Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0 |
The only caveat is it would probably be better to do that through a VPN setup rather than just expose the BOINC service ports to the Internet at large. I'm not saying the BOINC team doesn't make reasonable efforts at ensuring security, but that is a needless risk to take for very little benefit overall. Alinator |
Justin M. Morford Send message Joined: 23 Sep 99 Posts: 36 Credit: 2,539,975 RAC: 0 |
They don't even need to be on the same network (well, unless you consider the Internet one big network): I have four machines running, two of which are in geographically different areas (one in a different state--it belongs to some family of mine). As long as the machine is publicly accessible and the proper ports are forwarded through any NAT routers (1043 and 31416) and the gui_rpc_auth.cfg file password is set, the manager can connect to a BOINC instance anywhere in the world. I figured that was the case, I just wasn't sure which ports needed to be forwarded. Justin |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.