C2D E6300 performances

Message boards : Number crunching : C2D E6300 performances
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Pedro Mariano Yunes Garcia

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 226,176
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 516608 - Posted: 12 Feb 2007, 12:32:57 UTC - in response to Message 515836.  

I would like to know how other sistems (cpu+mobo+memory+O.C. or not+projects) with same CPU are crunching. Anyone with this processor?


Totally stock E6300 here even the stock cooler.

E6300 @ 1.86 ghz

PcChips P23G V1.0 mainboard, really El cheapo mainboard I paid 50.00$ bucks for
it LOL.

1.5 gigs of DDR 333 ram - Mismatched one is a 512 333 the other is a 1024 400.

System will sort of overclock to 2.0 ghz but questionable so I leave it stock.

System is really stable though, I'm playing games, running 2x WU's in the background and got a FTP running. It works.

I'm using one of the chicken optimized apps.

Oh yeah I'm running windows 2000 advanced server as well. I think maybe It's time to upgrade my OS, but hey it works.


Is it running 24/7?
ID: 516608 · Report as offensive
Pirate1958
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 03
Posts: 13
Credit: 2,679,227
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 516624 - Posted: 12 Feb 2007, 13:16:05 UTC
Last modified: 12 Feb 2007, 13:44:30 UTC

E6400 running "stock" on an ASUS P5B-E Plus, 2 x 1Gb Corsair DDR2 XMS2 PC6400 Dominator (4-4-4-12). Only purchased recently so still accumulating RAC (750 approx and rising) and this is at Max 80% resource utilization.

If I can find the necessary info I'd like to Overclock this beast a bit. Anyone have any leads?
It doesn't take me long to get nothing done!

ID: 516624 · Report as offensive
John Moffitt
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 03
Posts: 44
Credit: 7,471,083
RAC: 48
United States
Message 516854 - Posted: 12 Feb 2007, 23:58:58 UTC - in response to Message 516624.  
Last modified: 12 Feb 2007, 23:59:38 UTC

E6400 running "stock" on an ASUS P5B-E Plus, 2 x 1Gb Corsair DDR2 XMS2 PC6400 Dominator (4-4-4-12). Only purchased recently so still accumulating RAC (750 approx and rising) and this is at Max 80% resource utilization.

If I can find the necessary info I'd like to Overclock this beast a bit. Anyone have any leads?


I currently have my fsb up to 375 for my E6400, and haven't increased the voltage to processor at all. Ram is running out of sync at 900mhz from 800mhz, but bandwidth is still increased by about 15%. If you need any help overclocking, there are a lot of great guides on the internet. Try to find a fairly recent one however.

ID: 516854 · Report as offensive
Profile SoNic

Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 00
Posts: 140
Credit: 2,963,627
RAC: 0
Romania
Message 516863 - Posted: 13 Feb 2007, 1:24:27 UTC - in response to Message 516604.  
Last modified: 13 Feb 2007, 1:25:53 UTC

Very nice transition mobo! it's a pitty it isn't avaible here in Brazil yet. But I coudn't understand: with sse3 it was 1013. And after (or before?), with ssse3(sse4) it was worst? But this was a stock sse4 version? And now you're back using what?
thanks!


With SSSE3 ver 1.3 (aka SSE4) I have tested the long and medium work unit form chicken soup autotest. The software didn't want to test anything else than C2D client, but I trick it. And the SSE3 ver 2.0 was better.
With the stock client, the short units where a little quicker but the total RAC started to drop (long ones where longer I guess). Not a huge drop, but enough to switch back to SSE3. I didn't keep it on stock very much thou...

The MoBo I got it from NewEgg - I don't know if they are shipping to Brasil. Works good for now. I upgraded the AGP video with a specific PCI-E (from Asrock list) that will work with the 4x slot (16x phisical).

Sorry for OT...
ID: 516863 · Report as offensive
Rudolf Licht

Send message
Joined: 12 Jan 07
Posts: 2
Credit: 9,667
RAC: 0
United States
Message 516911 - Posted: 13 Feb 2007, 5:52:04 UTC

Is it running 24/7?

No it's not. Actually I play some online games sometimes and I turn it off and forget to turn it back on :). I wanna try to leave it on straight for like a month and see what kind of rac I get.
ID: 516911 · Report as offensive
tombew

Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 00
Posts: 111
Credit: 12,182,261
RAC: 0
United States
Message 516970 - Posted: 13 Feb 2007, 13:03:21 UTC - in response to Message 516624.  

E6400 running "stock" on an ASUS P5B-E Plus, 2 x 1Gb Corsair DDR2 XMS2 PC6400 Dominator (4-4-4-12). Only purchased recently so still accumulating RAC (750 approx and rising) and this is at Max 80% resource utilization.

If I can find the necessary info I'd like to Overclock this beast a bit. Anyone have any leads?


It appears that virtually every E6300 and E6400 is capable of ± 3.3 GHz, given adequate supporting hardware, of course.
My Asus P5B-Deluxe w/E6400 2Gb G.Skill PC6400(@ 1:1 5-5-5-15) took <1 hour to get to 3.3GHz. Voltages had to increased, temps are fine. SETI RAC ± 1600 (SETI=90%)

Google for < Overclocking Guide > and < Overclocking P5B >, and look around articles and Hardware Forums Like hardocp,com and ocia.net and overclockers.com
ID: 516970 · Report as offensive
Profile Craxx

Send message
Joined: 22 May 99
Posts: 10
Credit: 1,252,332
RAC: 0
United States
Message 517028 - Posted: 13 Feb 2007, 16:23:46 UTC

toffa, with that dominator ram, youll have no problem overclockin that chip to at least 2.8, you could get it a lot higher than that

the motherboard you have is also good, ASUS boards all have some overclocking in the BIOS
ID: 517028 · Report as offensive
Profile Ghery S. Pettit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Nov 99
Posts: 325
Credit: 28,109,066
RAC: 82
United States
Message 517281 - Posted: 14 Feb 2007, 5:23:47 UTC - in response to Message 515012.  

Anybody with stock speeds?


E6700 under the hood of my new machine. ASUS P5W DH MB. 2 GBytes of RAM (2 1 GByte 800 MHz DDR2 sticks, one on each memory channel). No overclocking, so 2.66 GHz. I'm still waiting to find an initial RAC number as this machine hasn't been running for 10 days yet, but after approximately 5 days of constant operation, running the stock SETI process, it has 4397 credits. That's working out to an RAC of about 880. We'll see where it actually settles in.


Ghery, I looked at some of your results and it looks like you might be using the default cruncher. Many of us on this forum use Simon, the Chicken of Angnor's optimized cruncher instead of the default. In my case, with PD950s, it about doubles computation speed (unless the default has been improved since mid-2006) You might consider this. Not responsible for problems or damage caused by this change or attempts. You should be able to find it by looking for his messages. I hope that Simons cruncher handles Vista. I thought it did.


Oh boy! That was like mashing the accellerator! 60 credit WUs that were taking around 8000 seconds are now taking around 5000 seconds to run. Yahoo! Glad I've got a cable modem connection to keep this beast fed with new WUs. :-)

Now I'm updating my slower machines. What a day to do it. None have .NET installed, so I'm having to update the OS and what does MS do? Release a ton of security updates. Those machines are taking forever to update, nevermind run the SETI tests.

Thanks again for the suggestion.


ID: 517281 · Report as offensive
DryHeat [SETI.USA]

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 03
Posts: 79
Credit: 280,191
RAC: 0
United States
Message 517486 - Posted: 14 Feb 2007, 19:39:18 UTC - in response to Message 517281.  
Last modified: 14 Feb 2007, 19:40:10 UTC


Oh boy! That was like mashing the accellerator! 60 credit WUs that were taking around 8000 seconds are now taking around 5000 seconds to run. Yahoo! Glad I've got a cable modem connection to keep this beast fed with new WUs. :-)

Now I'm updating my slower machines. What a day to do it. None have .NET installed, so I'm having to update the OS and what does MS do? Release a ton of security updates. Those machines are taking forever to update, nevermind run the SETI tests.

Thanks again for the suggestion.


Now you need to overclock it. Just keep on eye on the core temperatures. Full load temps should not be over 60C. If they are, a new CPU heatsink/fan should be on your short list of things to buy.

I use a program called CoreTemp and another called SIV (system information viewer) to monitor my system.

ID: 517486 · Report as offensive
Pedro Mariano Yunes Garcia

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 226,176
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 517584 - Posted: 14 Feb 2007, 23:26:21 UTC - in response to Message 515836.  


Totally stock E6300 here even the stock cooler.

E6300 @ 1.86 ghz

PcChips P23G V1.0 mainboard, really El cheapo mainboard I paid 50.00$ bucks for
it LOL.

1.5 gigs of DDR 333 ram - Mismatched one is a 512 333 the other is a 1024 400.

System will sort of overclock to 2.0 ghz but questionable so I leave it stock.

System is really stable though, I'm playing games, running 2x WU's in the background and got a FTP running. It works.

I'm using one of the chicken optimized apps.

Oh yeah I'm running windows 2000 advanced server as well. I think maybe It's time to upgrade my OS, but hey it works.


Is it running 24/7? If not, could you let it do so, for like a week or two, so I could compare it to mine?
ID: 517584 · Report as offensive
Pedro Mariano Yunes Garcia

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 226,176
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 517619 - Posted: 15 Feb 2007, 0:48:34 UTC - in response to Message 516863.  
Last modified: 15 Feb 2007, 0:51:43 UTC

With SSSE3 ver 1.3 (aka SSE4) I have tested the long and medium work unit form chicken soup autotest. The software didn't want to test anything else than C2D client, but I trick it. And the SSE3 ver 2.0 was better.
With the stock client, the short units where a little quicker but the total RAC started to drop (long ones where longer I guess). Not a huge drop, but enough to switch back to SSE3. I didn't keep it on stock very much thou...


Can you send me that tricked version so I can try it here? Isn't there a 2.0 SSSE3 soft? Why didn't you tried it?
ID: 517619 · Report as offensive
Profile Ghery S. Pettit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Nov 99
Posts: 325
Credit: 28,109,066
RAC: 82
United States
Message 517623 - Posted: 15 Feb 2007, 0:59:19 UTC - in response to Message 517486.  

Now you need to overclock it. Just keep on eye on the core temperatures. Full load temps should not be over 60C. If they are, a new CPU heatsink/fan should be on your short list of things to buy.

I use a program called CoreTemp and another called SIV (system information viewer) to monitor my system.


I'll leave it at stock speed for now. This isn't just a number cruncher, it will become my prime machine for home use. I'm reliably informed that overclocking does impact life expectancy and being the cheapskate that I am (I did get the processor at a substantial discount as I work for the manufacturer) I really don't want to spring for another one anytime soon. This machine is replacing a 6 year old PIII system, so I expect it to last a long time.



ID: 517623 · Report as offensive
Profile SoNic

Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 00
Posts: 140
Credit: 2,963,627
RAC: 0
Romania
Message 517638 - Posted: 15 Feb 2007, 2:03:25 UTC - in response to Message 517619.  
Last modified: 15 Feb 2007, 2:05:00 UTC


Can you send me that tricked version so I can try it here? Isn't there a 2.0 SSSE3 soft? Why didn't you tried it?

There is no ver 2.0 for SSSE3. At least not here.

ID: 517638 · Report as offensive
Profile hiamps
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 4292
Credit: 72,971,319
RAC: 0
United States
Message 517644 - Posted: 15 Feb 2007, 2:20:14 UTC - in response to Message 517623.  
Last modified: 15 Feb 2007, 2:20:40 UTC

Now you need to overclock it. Just keep on eye on the core temperatures. Full load temps should not be over 60C. If they are, a new CPU heatsink/fan should be on your short list of things to buy.

I use a program called CoreTemp and another called SIV (system information viewer) to monitor my system.


I'll leave it at stock speed for now. This isn't just a number cruncher, it will become my prime machine for home use. I'm reliably informed that overclocking does impact life expectancy and being the cheapskate that I am (I did get the processor at a substantial discount as I work for the manufacturer) I really don't want to spring for another one anytime soon. This machine is replacing a 6 year old PIII system, so I expect it to last a long time.




I'm a cheapskate...thats why I overclock...Killed one with water but never by overclocking...I buy the cheaper chip and overclock it to the one I wanted...LOL

Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons...
And no good credit hound!
ID: 517644 · Report as offensive
Pedro Mariano Yunes Garcia

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 226,176
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 521641 - Posted: 22 Feb 2007, 17:21:20 UTC - in response to Message 517638.  
Last modified: 22 Feb 2007, 17:21:55 UTC


Can you send me that tricked version so I can try it here? Isn't there a 2.0 SSSE3 soft? Why didn't you tried it?

There is no ver 2.0 for SSSE3. At least not here.


Ok, now we have the 2.2 there...
ID: 521641 · Report as offensive
Pedro Mariano Yunes Garcia

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 226,176
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 521692 - Posted: 22 Feb 2007, 19:47:15 UTC - in response to Message 514954.  
Last modified: 22 Feb 2007, 19:47:50 UTC

Searchy! Internet Services V.O.F.
wrote:
I got a C2D E6300 @ 1.8ghz running 24/7 on a WXP system. (D946GZIS mainboard, 1gb DDR2 533mhz ram) and it has a RAC around 1050 with an optimized client.


You should try the new 2.2 since you have lots of C2D!!!!
ID: 521692 · Report as offensive
Pedro Mariano Yunes Garcia

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 226,176
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 521694 - Posted: 22 Feb 2007, 19:53:01 UTC

Looking for a stock E6300, with non-ddr2 memory, running 2.0 or later Simon's app.
ID: 521694 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : C2D E6300 performances


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.