Intel P4 Hyperthreading

Message boards : Number crunching : Intel P4 Hyperthreading
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile Keck_Komputers
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 1575
Credit: 4,152,111
RAC: 1
United States
Message 5393 - Posted: 8 Jul 2004, 21:56:58 UTC - in response to Message 5302.  
Last modified: 8 Jul 2004, 21:59:55 UTC

> > An HT processor has several different areas of the processor. For
> example,
> > Logic, Integer math, and Floating Point Math all happen in separate areas
> of
> > the chip. The idea is to allow a second process to use an area of the
> chip
> > that the first process is not using. However, S@H is very heavily
> Floating
> > point, so the Floating Point area will be very heavily used, and be the
> > bottleneck for getting work done. If you had two processes, one that was
> all
> > integer, and the other that was all floating point, they would collapse
> > together better.
> > <a>
> href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&userid=9915">
> >
> >
> This is exactly the same as the Unitied Deviced/GRID system is with their
> cancer/smallpox research. With HT one instance says only 50% is being used
> however all of the Floating Point process is being used. So running two
> wouldnt help in getting any results any faster.
> Has anyone done any HT time testing with boinc to see if theres an increase in
> WU's between running just one instance and running two?
>
The tests have been done and the fraction is 1.3 to 1.4 with seti.

John Keck
BOINCing since 2002/12/08
ID: 5393 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : Intel P4 Hyperthreading


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.