Message boards :
Number crunching :
Intel P4 Hyperthreading
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 1575 Credit: 4,152,111 RAC: 1 ![]() |
> > An HT processor has several different areas of the processor. For > example, > > Logic, Integer math, and Floating Point Math all happen in separate areas > of > > the chip. The idea is to allow a second process to use an area of the > chip > > that the first process is not using. However, S@H is very heavily > Floating > > point, so the Floating Point area will be very heavily used, and be the > > bottleneck for getting work done. If you had two processes, one that was > all > > integer, and the other that was all floating point, they would collapse > > together better. > > <a> > href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&userid=9915"> ![]() > > > > > This is exactly the same as the Unitied Deviced/GRID system is with their > cancer/smallpox research. With HT one instance says only 50% is being used > however all of the Floating Point process is being used. So running two > wouldnt help in getting any results any faster. > Has anyone done any HT time testing with boinc to see if theres an increase in > WU's between running just one instance and running two? > The tests have been done and the fraction is 1.3 to 1.4 with seti. John Keck BOINCing since 2002/12/08 |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.