CPU Usage @ 100%...cause for concern?

Questions and Answers : Windows : CPU Usage @ 100%...cause for concern?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 790,712
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481840 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 2:22:23 UTC - in response to Message 481831.  

I appreciate the additional comments and opinions:


Question of the Day:

"Is it ok to run a 1.60GHz Pent4 24/7 while crunching SAH & EAH?"

POLL RESULTS:

YES....6 (Added Alinator's above...thanks)

NO.....1

This is not a scientific poll...but is a poll of scientists.


I do this regularly (it is actually either a P4-1.5 or a P4-2.0. I also have several slower machines.


BOINC WIKI
ID: 481840 · Report as offensive
Telstar
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 03
Posts: 50
Credit: 20,806
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481831 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 2:08:15 UTC
Last modified: 14 Dec 2006, 2:15:21 UTC

I appreciate the additional comments and opinions:


Question of the Day:

"Is it ok to run a 1.60GHz Pent4 24/7 while crunching SAH & EAH?"

POLL RESULTS:

YES....6 (Added Alinator's above...thanks)

NO.....1

This is not a scientific poll...but is a poll of scientists.


ID: 481831 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481830 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 2:04:36 UTC

Yep, my Intels are Dells, the AMDs are an HP, a Compaq, and the other 3 I built myself. All of them run 24/7/365 and the only hardware failures I've had are 2 fans. One was a CPU fan and the other was a PSU fan, and even that's not a big deal since they typically let you know they're getting sick long before they stop spinning.

Anyone who tells you running the CPU at 100% utilization is "bad" for it doesn't know what they're talking about. If anything it extends their service life by reducing their exposure to inrush current when being powered up and reducing thermal cycling of the interconnects. Those are the two most common "killers" of electronic devices.

Alinator
ID: 481830 · Report as offensive
Profile Pooh Bear 27
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 03
Posts: 3222
Credit: 4,603,826
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481820 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 1:46:52 UTC

I have 4 Dells, P4 1.8G, P4 Xeon 1.5G, P4 Xeon 2.4 HT, and P4 2.8G all running 24/7. The P4 1.8G has been going for nearly 3 years at 100%. The others have been running since I got them. None have overheated, and I just make sure the power supplies and heat sinks stay clean. About once every couple of months, I go through all the machines, and clear the dust.


ID: 481820 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481815 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 1:37:11 UTC - in response to Message 481812.  

John McLeod VII wrote:
"There are many computers that run 24/7 at full CPU load with no problems. There are also some that have insufficient cooling that only last a few dozen minutes at full CPU usage."

Yep, I understand what you're saying John...depends on the particular unit.
Since I didn't build this DIM4400 of course, Dell did...I have to rely on the cooling system (fan) that I have installed to do the job.
Maybe I'll go so far as checking with their Support (OMG...not someone in India I hope..(after holding for 45 minutes)...lol)...or perhaps via their website to see if there's anything about running 24/7 @ 100%.
Thanks, Telstar

Not that it is representative of all Dell's but I have had 3 running 24/7 for more than 12 months as part of my 'ranch'.

ID: 481815 · Report as offensive
Telstar
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 03
Posts: 50
Credit: 20,806
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481812 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 1:06:57 UTC

John McLeod VII wrote:
"There are many computers that run 24/7 at full CPU load with no problems. There are also some that have insufficient cooling that only last a few dozen minutes at full CPU usage."

Yep, I understand what you're saying John...depends on the particular unit.
Since I didn't build this DIM4400 of course, Dell did...I have to rely on the cooling system (fan) that I have installed to do the job.
Maybe I'll go so far as checking with their Support (OMG...not someone in India I hope..(after holding for 45 minutes)...lol)...or perhaps via their website to see if there's anything about running 24/7 @ 100%.

Thanks,

Telstar
ID: 481812 · Report as offensive
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 790,712
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481810 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 0:57:33 UTC - in response to Message 481808.  

Howzat wrote:
"Hi,
running at 100% cpu isnt really good
due to heat reasons if ran for to long at 100% worst case senerio is your cpu could overheat and die i sugest if you are running your cpu at 100% not to run for a long period of time example 24 hour."

Thanks for your comment Howzat, but it seems to contradict what two other posters say:

Monkeydee wrote:
"SAH and EAH are designed to use all of your cpu's idle "power". so running at 100% cpu usage is what is supposed to happen."


OzzFan wrote:
"As long as you have sufficient cooling, every processor is designed to withstand 100% use, 24/7"


Any way to settle this difference of opinions?
I want to get the most out of my Processor, but not at the expense of seeing it burn up of course...I'd like to get a couple more years out of this thing.

Thanks,

Telstar

There are many computers that run 24/7 at full CPU load with no problems. There are also some that have insufficient cooling that only last a few dozen minutes at full CPU usage.


BOINC WIKI
ID: 481810 · Report as offensive
Telstar
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 03
Posts: 50
Credit: 20,806
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481808 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 0:55:03 UTC

Howzat wrote:
"Hi,
running at 100% cpu isnt really good
due to heat reasons if ran for to long at 100% worst case senerio is your cpu could overheat and die i sugest if you are running your cpu at 100% not to run for a long period of time example 24 hour."

Thanks for your comment Howzat, but it seems to contradict what two other posters say:

Monkeydee wrote:
"SAH and EAH are designed to use all of your cpu's idle "power". so running at 100% cpu usage is what is supposed to happen."


OzzFan wrote:
"As long as you have sufficient cooling, every processor is designed to withstand 100% use, 24/7"


Any way to settle this difference of opinions?
I want to get the most out of my Processor, but not at the expense of seeing it burn up of course...I'd like to get a couple more years out of this thing.

Thanks,

Telstar
ID: 481808 · Report as offensive
Howzat

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 481775 - Posted: 14 Dec 2006, 0:16:29 UTC - in response to Message 481200.  

Hi,
running at 100% cpu isnt really good
due to heat reasons if ran for to long at 100% worst case senerio is your cpu could overheat and die i sugest if you are running your cpu at 100% not to run for a long period of time example 24 hour

Windows XP Home SP2
1.60GHz Pent4/768RAM
BOINC 5.4.11
SAH & EAH
DSL


Now that I've added a second Project and am now running both SAH & EAH, I see that now when I open the Task Manager and check the CPU Usage, it's running at a constant 100% (while I perform other tasks).

Granted that I have adjusted some of the Preferences that now show:

SAH Resource Share @ 200% (66.67%)
EAH Resource Share @ 100% (33.33%)


I have also gone to:
Tools>Activity>Run Always (checked)
Tools>Activity>Network Activity always available (checked)

...Thus overriding my Preferences setting to:

"Do work only after computer is idle for 4 minutes"

Looking for any comments as to whether running at a constant 100% all the time is detrimental to the Processor.

I don't have a CPU Heat Monitor installed but my concern is along the lines of whether the 100% could cause the Processor to run hot/overheat and/or shorten the effective lifespan of the Processor.

Thank you.

Telstar


ID: 481775 · Report as offensive
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 790,712
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481274 - Posted: 13 Dec 2006, 4:38:21 UTC

BTW, the time slice for each project defaults to an hour. So 66% for A and 33% for B would have A run for 2 hours followed by B for an hour...


BOINC WIKI
ID: 481274 · Report as offensive
Telstar
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 03
Posts: 50
Credit: 20,806
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481265 - Posted: 13 Dec 2006, 4:20:39 UTC

Monkeydee wrote:
SAH and EAH are designed to use all of your cpu's idle "power". so running at 100% cpu usage is what is supposed to happen.


OzzFan wrote:
As long as you have sufficient cooling, every processor is designed to withstand 100% use, 24/7


Ok great, just wanted to be sure it was nothing unusual...
thanks for the reassurance.

Telstar
ID: 481265 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15687
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 62
United States
Message 481221 - Posted: 13 Dec 2006, 2:53:41 UTC - in response to Message 481200.  

SAH Resource Share @ 200% (66.67%)
EAH Resource Share @ 100% (33.33%)


The resource preference does not limit CPU usage. The resource share simply splits your time between projects (and note they are not percentages, but simply a numerical value).

The CPU limiter preference is displayed in the General Preferences section, under Use at Most: 100 percent of CPU time.

I don't have a CPU Heat Monitor installed but my concern is along the lines of whether the 100% could cause the Processor to run hot/overheat and/or shorten the effective lifespan of the Processor.


As long as you have sufficient cooling, every processor is designed to withstand 100% use, 24/7. As long as your CPU stays within the guidelines the manufacturer states for their product, there has been no known data to prove that is shortens the lifespan of a processor considerably (an example would be older Pentium servers that have been running at 100%, 24/7 since they were released back in 1993-4 [not necessarily running SETI@Home, obviously] and still run fine today).

Though these CPUs of today run much hotter, there's insufficient data to prove that they cannot withstand the test of time (until they become older technology). Chances are, you'll upgrade long before your CPU craps out.
ID: 481221 · Report as offensive
Keith R.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 02
Posts: 36
Credit: 134,691
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 481213 - Posted: 13 Dec 2006, 2:22:15 UTC

SAH and EAH are designed to use all of your cpu's idle "power". so running at 100% cpu usage is what is supposed to happen. if you are concerned about heat you can get programs like Everest, Speedfan, or Coretemp to measure your cpu temperature.
i think the only way that running your cpu at 100% would reduce the lifespan of the cpu would be if it were running too hot.

i'm sure someone else here can provide a better answer.
ID: 481213 · Report as offensive
Telstar
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 03
Posts: 50
Credit: 20,806
RAC: 0
United States
Message 481200 - Posted: 13 Dec 2006, 1:52:03 UTC
Last modified: 13 Dec 2006, 1:58:02 UTC

Hi,

Windows XP Home SP2
1.60GHz Pent4/768RAM
BOINC 5.4.11
SAH & EAH
DSL


Now that I've added a second Project and am now running both SAH & EAH, I see that now when I open the Task Manager and check the CPU Usage, it's running at a constant 100% (while I perform other tasks).

Granted that I have adjusted some of the Preferences that now show:

SAH Resource Share @ 200% (66.67%)
EAH Resource Share @ 100% (33.33%)


I have also gone to:
Tools>Activity>Run Always (checked)
Tools>Activity>Network Activity always available (checked)

...Thus overriding my Preferences setting to:

"Do work only after computer is idle for 4 minutes"

Looking for any comments as to whether running at a constant 100% all the time is detrimental to the Processor.

I don't have a CPU Heat Monitor installed but my concern is along the lines of whether the 100% could cause the Processor to run hot/overheat and/or shorten the effective lifespan of the Processor.

Thank you.

Telstar
ID: 481200 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Windows : CPU Usage @ 100%...cause for concern?


 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.