Princeton scientists Hack Diebold

---

Account frozen...

"Hacking" Diebold is a joke.

---

Just go and vote!

---

Red Bull Air Racing

Gas price by zip at Seti

Just go and vote!

Obviously, but doesn't this throw an extra question mark into the winner?

---

Account frozen...

There's a winner?

---

No need to hack ...
It is as much a 'lay-down mizere' as Nixon's second election
All the Dems need to do is ...
SAY NUTHIN!
(Problem is, there will still be dumb-boy at the helm!)
This is from a man who thinks Genghis Khan was a limp wristed pinko leftie ...

"Hacking" Diebold is a joke.

The votes are in. According to the Diebold voting machine your new name is Neo.

---

me@rescam.org

Princeton scientists Hack Diebold

BUMP

---

Account frozen...

Not enough mail ballots invites problems

---

me@rescam.org

PBS: Diebold Voting flaws

---

Account frozen...

Just go and vote!

Obviously, but doesn't this throw an extra question mark into the winner?

The dems can't try to sway the election when there are no chads.

Move to an area where they don't have enough money to buy those machines.

---

Red Bull Air Racing

Gas price by zip at Seti

Just go and vote!

Obviously, but doesn't this throw an extra question mark into the winner?

The dems can't try to sway the election when there are no chads.

Didn't help the last time did it?

Move to an area where they don't have enough money to buy those machines.

Republicans are the only safe ones eh? Besides that Federal $$$ is provided for these machines.

---

Account frozen...

Just go and vote!

Obviously, but doesn't this throw an extra question mark into the winner?

The dems can't try to sway the election when there are no chads.

Didn't help the last time did it?

Move to an area where they don't have enough money to buy those machines.

Republicans are the only safe ones eh? Besides that Federal $$$ is provided for these machines.

We still have paper ballots here in Wisconsin.
Vote absentee and you get a paper ballot.
But watch out the dems may want to throws those ballots out!

---

Red Bull Air Racing

Gas price by zip at Seti

But watch out the dems may want to throws those ballots out!

Throw 'em out with the republicans.

---

Account frozen...

Out here electronic voting (just like real voting) is voluntary, but I hear that they're using both electronic and paper to see if one >ahem!< has a greater "truthiness factor" than another or some such BS measure of unreliability...

---

Out here electronic voting (just like real voting) is voluntary, but I hear that they're using both electronic and paper to see if one >ahem!< has a greater "truthiness factor" than another or some such BS measure of unreliability...

OOps!

---

Red Bull Air Racing

Gas price by zip at Seti

Out here electronic voting (just like real voting) is voluntary, but I hear that they're using both electronic and paper to see if one >ahem!< has a greater "truthiness factor" than another or some such BS measure of unreliability...

OOps!

The Princeton clip shows a vulnerability, but the voting machines are supposed to be certified prior to the election and 100% monitored in secure locations to prevent improper access until the election. The monitoring is supposed to require the "buddy system" for any access to the area where the machines are stored. Thus any operations such as those shown infecting the voting machines would require at least 2 people. Not impossible, but if the controlled access "buddies" are required to be from different parties you would have a built-in check on the illegal activity.

Out here electronic voting (just like real voting) is voluntary, but I hear that they're using both electronic and paper to see if one >ahem!< has a greater "truthiness factor" than another or some such BS measure of unreliability...

OOps!

The Princeton clip shows a vulnerability, but the voting machines are supposed to be certified prior to the election and 100% monitored in secure locations to prevent improper access until the election. The monitoring is supposed to require the "buddy system" for any access to the area where the machines are stored. Thus any operations such as those shown infecting the voting machines would require at least 2 people. Not impossible, but if the controlled access "buddies" are required to be from different parties you would have a built-in check on the illegal activity.

The key word in your quote is "supposed". However, some of the hacks take less than a minute. Are we absolutely certain that all of the devices are kept in such a way that nobody can get a minute alone with them?

---

BOINC WIKI

Out here electronic voting (just like real voting) is voluntary, but I hear that they're using both electronic and paper to see if one >ahem!< has a greater "truthiness factor" than another or some such BS measure of unreliability...

OOps!

The Princeton clip shows a vulnerability, but the voting machines are supposed to be certified prior to the election and 100% monitored in secure locations to prevent improper access until the election. The monitoring is supposed to require the "buddy system" for any access to the area where the machines are stored. Thus any operations such as those shown infecting the voting machines would require at least 2 people. Not impossible, but if the controlled access "buddies" are required to be from different parties you would have a built-in check on the illegal activity.

The key word in your quote is "supposed". However, some of the hacks take less than a minute. Are we absolutely certain that all of the devices are kept in such a way that nobody can get a minute alone with them?

Only if the election supervisors are honest.

...and the 2600 members forget their videocameras...

---