Simons latest does well on VLARs (with my PD950s). They take longer but they have more credits. VLARs yield more credits per hour (on my PD950s). The units that have around 0.7 to 1.12 angle range don't take quite as long to do but have much fewer credits. Their credits-per-hour yield is low, often only 1/2 that of the VLARs. With other setups Simon's latest will behave differently.

A quick check on my computers , C2D and Pent M, show different results. The VLAR credits/hr are the lowest as shown below:

			C2D	PM
VLAR	 	0.088	28	15
Common	 	0.426	40	21
Higher	 	0.732	32	17
High	 	1.18	48	24
VHAR	 	7.6	45	NA

Andy

97.45

Result ID 423472645
Name 18jn03ab.13890.3826.173580.3.130_1
Workunit 101504091
Created 26 Nov 2006 7:03:48 UTC
Sent 27 Nov 2006 2:22:06 UTC
Received 3 Dec 2006 7:15:27 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Success
Client state Done
Exit status 0 (0x0)
Computer ID 1308522
Report deadline 16 Dec 2006 4:42:06 UTC
CPU time 33200.097817
stderr out

<core_client_version>5.2.14</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
Optimized Linux SETI@Home Enhanced application
Version info: Linux SSE2 32-bit V5.15 'Chicken Good!' (R1.3|+freq|xW/axW)
Compiled by Simon Zadra (KWSN - Chicken of Angnor) - Member of the Knights who say Ni! (http://www.kwsn.net)
Download Updates at: http://www.zadra.org/seti_enhanced/

CPU real speed: 1801 MHz

Work Unit Info
True angle range: 0.084687

Flopcounter: 25132806434845.078125

Spike count: 1
Pulse count: 8
Triplet count: 0
Gaussian count: 0
</stderr_txt>

Validate state Valid
Claimed credit 97.4478027276979
Granted credit 97.4487947475887
application version 5.15

---

91.20 for http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=102259396

---

98.13 : )

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=426593002

---

Claimed Credit: 89.09
Granted Credit: 111.08
WU = http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=101499825

---

D.

Claimed Credit: 89.09
Granted Credit: 111.08
WU = http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=101499825

You got grouped with a couple of BOINC v4.x clients that overclaimed. It doesn’t happen very often any more: think of it as a bonus.

---

88.35

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=425665849
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=102028425

---

Claimed Credit: 89.09
Granted Credit: 111.08
WU = http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=101499825

You got grouped with a couple of BOINC v4.x clients that overclaimed. It doesn’t happen very often any more: think of it as a bonus.

LOL, I'd gladly trade that result with them. I just got ~45 when teamed up with a pair 4.45's for a 0.4265, which would pay in the low 60's on a current client.

Although I have gotten the 4x "bonus" as well, so I guess you have to take the good with bad, as the saying goes. ;-)

Alinator

Another batch of high-credit WUs on tape 26mr99ab.9689.28034.654818.3.93 - I'm claiming 93.55 for WU 103355013.

AR = 0.088329

Hello all :) I have 87.96 clamed and granted on this unit: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=431129588

Regards

Luth

Not a high credit, but another interesting outlier - AR = 14.825267 for WU 104201469

Hi, I just updated to Chicken Soup Ver. 2.2 and the first unit has claimed 89.68.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=114196126

That'll settle itself down soon enough.

Btw, check this URL to see my Sempron 2500+ (Oldschool S478) OC'd to 2.2Ghz whooping an A64's behind with Chickens 2.2 :p
Best is, the unit was 1/3'd trough callculatiing when I updated the client. I'm expecting it to drop another 1000 or so seconds.

That comming from 22000+ seconds for a 60 Credit WU in the vanilla seti app and 16000+ seconds for a 60 Credit WU on Chickens 2.0 :p

I don't think it'll get any better then this. Wish he had a new 2.2 compile for linux clients, my P3's would love it.

Hmm strange one this one but gotten 114 for it....

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=115869751

greetings

Highest so far is 90.19

---

My highest was also around 93. Can't find it in the list anymore though (can you get a list somewhere that shows ALL the WU's you processed?)

My highest was also around 93. Can't find it in the list anymore though (can you get a list somewhere that shows ALL the WU's you processed?)

Not from BOINC or the project, but both BoincLogX and BoincView will log all results. If your primary interest is credits, though, note that the logging does not include the credit requested or granted for individual WUs.

                                                                 Joe

Hmm strange one this one but gotten 114 for it....

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=115869751

You were lucky enough to have two high-claiming BOINC v4.x clients in that quorum. Your claim of ~62 CS was presumably ‘correct’, but was the lowest of the three.

---

the best of mine (i think)

Result ID 482805293
Name 01no03aa.24836.24002.361066.3.2_3
Workunit 115606872
Created 22 Feb 2007 22:51:20 UTC
Sent 23 Feb 2007 13:08:28 UTC
Received 24 Feb 2007 19:05:06 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Success
Client state Done
Exit status 0 (0x0)
Computer ID 2991770
Report deadline 14 Mar 2007 15:28:28 UTC
CPU time 6283.15625
stderr out <core_client_version>5.8.8</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Optimized SETI@Home Enhanced application
Optimizers: Ben Herndon, Josef Segur, Alex Kan, Simon Zadra
Version: Windows SSE3 32-bit based on seti V5.15 'Noo? No - Ni!'
Revision: R-2.2|xT|FFT:IPP_SSE3|Ben-Joe
CPUID: Intel Core 2 Duo 'Conroe'
CPUs: 1, cores: 2, threads: 1 cache: L1=32K, L2=4096K, L3=0K
Features: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3
speed: 3306 MHz -- read MB/s: L1=12340, L2=10686, RAM=5886

Work Unit Info
True angle range: 0.084328

Spikes Pulses Triplets Gaussians Flops
1 4 2 0 25270791318754

</stderr_txt>
]]>


Validate state Valid
Claimed credit 97.9828135622984
Granted credit 97.9828135622984
application version 5.17

Regards

Hmm strange one this one but gotten 114 for it....

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=115869751

You were lucky enough to have two high-claiming BOINC v4.x clients in that quorum. Your claim of ~62 CS was presumably ‘correct’, but was the lowest of the three.

hehe. this is fun so i get profit of greedy clients :-)))
and gaine that lot... noone else can tell me ever again about 'truth doesnt pay out' :-))))