August 10, 2005 stuck wu's
Message boards :
Number crunching :
August 10, 2005 stuck wu's
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
PhonAcq Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 1656 Credit: 30,658,217 RAC: 1 
|
I have several computers listed with wu's issued on August 10, 2005. The results were returned a couple of days later, and received credit. However, the wu's are still listed and have not been purged. Doesn't central command purge old results? It appears that there is a bug in the system. May this Farce be with You ID: 351960 ·  |
 Diego -=Mav3rik=-  Send message Joined: 1 Jun 99 Posts: 333 Credit: 3,587,148 RAC: 0 |
I have several computers listed with wu's issued on August 10, 2005. The results were returned a couple of days later, and received credit. However, the wu's are still listed and have not been purged. Bug, feature, glitch in the matrix, who knows... ;-) /Mav  We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to set sail for the stars. (Carl Sagan) ID: 352590 · |
|
PhonAcq Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 1656 Credit: 30,658,217 RAC: 1
|
I have several computers listed with wu's issued on August 10, 2005. The results were returned a couple of days later, and received credit. However, the wu's are still listed and have not been purged. But does anybody care? I've lost the 'faith' on that one. May this Farce be with You ID: 353716 · |
Geek@Play  Send message Joined: 31 Jul 01 Posts: 2467 Credit: 86,146,931 RAC: 0
|
Some kind of server failure occurred on that date and many of us still have wu's from that date that have not been purged. I have 5 or 6. I have pointed this out many times on the forums here but it is apparently impossible to remove these rogue work units from the system. I have become very fond of mine and for historical purposes do not want them removed. That said someone will probably find a way to remove them! Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....Boinc.... ID: 353724 · |
Hans Dorn  Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2262 Credit: 26,448,570 RAC: 0 
|
Some kind of server failure occurred on that date and many of us still have wu's from that date that have not been purged. I have 5 or 6. I have pointed this out many times on the forums here but it is apparently impossible to remove these rogue work units from the system. Heh, Heh, Heh :o) Regards Hans ID: 353839 · |
Steve Cressman  Send message Joined: 6 Jun 02 Posts: 583 Credit: 65,644 RAC: 0 
|
Some kind of server failure occurred on that date and many of us still have wu's from that date that have not been purged. I have 5 or 6. I have pointed this out many times on the forums here but it is apparently impossible to remove these rogue work units from the system. I made a similar post over a year ago about wanting to keep the couple i had. They where there for several months until my comment, then about 36 hours later they disappeared. lol 98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8  And God said"Let there be light."But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer. ID: 353961 · |
|
PhonAcq Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 1656 Credit: 30,658,217 RAC: 1
|
Old lament, worth revisiting... Now with the new databases, servers, nas's, and whatever, do you think someone could clean up the old entries? The Aug 10 wu's are still stuck. Leaving them around is not very professional, from my perspective (which is routinely ignored by CommandCentral as well as my wife, but I don't mind.) May this Farce be with You ID: 442490 · |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.