Both AMD machines work great. One is my laptop I have with me on the road and the other is a server running Windows 2000. No other problems or issues at all. Not doing any overclocking.

Which one is this one?

---

problem is your still using an optimized 4.45 client to try to crunch the 5.12+ work units. this won't work.

What's wrong?

Result ID 332002807
Name 30au99ab.18587.6082.236092.3.175_0
Workunit 79630705
Created 25 May 2006 3:31:36 UTC
Sent 25 May 2006 23:31:06 UTC
Received 26 May 2006 6:27:02 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Computing
Exit status 3 (0x3)
Computer ID 1240160
Report deadline 14 Jun 2006 1:51:06 UTC
CPU time 5998.578125
stderr out

<core_client_version>4.45</core_client_version>
<message>The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
ar=0.037194 NumCfft=51177 NumGauss= 0 NumPulse= 166225343616 NumTriplet= 11930737557504

</stderr_txt>

Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 8.56933597145616
Granted credit 0
application version 5.15

---

problem is your still using an optimized 4.45 client to try to crunch the 5.12+ work units. this won't work.

[...]
<core_client_version>4.45</core_client_version>
[...]
application version 5.15

The v4.45 BOINC client won't claim the correct amount of credit, but that shouldn't make any difference to the processing. The above indicates that Peter has the current Enhanced app. While it's recommended that a more recent version of BOINC be used, quite a few users are still running earlier ones without errors.

---

Many thanks for the advice. Being a total duffer I had not realised I was running an old version. Now downloaded the latest and seeing what happens.

My admiration of true genius is undimmed!

---

Anyone else had a problem with this one?
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.39_2
It locked up for 30 minutes and was stuck at .300%.
MacGregor inspite of them!!!!

---

'S rioghal mo dhream

Yes!!!!
14ja99aa.26346.5696.622130.3.2_0
42 hrs 4 min 01 sec to completion.

Been noticing a swing in time for completion. Just noticed that file and the length of time for completion. I wonder if SETI is throwing in some extra long files to crunch.

Thank I might try and download the lastest version and see if that helps.

This is the web address to provide the explanation of that file, I do believe.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_enhanced.php

---

Check and see if you have the latest updated version, which is 5.4.9.

---

How about this for a list of computation errors?

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=1356044

I wish there was some way we could contact other users other than the message boards... this is one very sick PC

---

How about this for a list of computation errors?

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=1356044

I wish there was some way we could contact other users other than the message boards... this is one very sick PC

Here too, errors on the Dual Pentium, very often.

5/28/2006 7:41:30 AM|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 07ja99aa.23932.19938.743758.3.30_1 (The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3))

Nick

PS: I wonder when oh when will they be corrected.

---

Me too...

2006-05-27 17:43:52 [SETI@home] Finished upload of file 30au99ab.18587.12176.840922.3.94_1_0
2006-05-27 17:43:52 [SETI@home] Throughput 24975 bytes/sec
2006-05-27 20:02:12 [SETI@home] Unrecoverable error for result 30au99ab.18587.12176.840922.3.98_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
2006-05-27 20:02:12 [SETI@home] Deferring scheduler requests for 1 minutes and 0 seconds
2006-05-27 20:02:12 [---] Rescheduling CPU: application exited
2006-05-27 20:02:12 [SETI@home] Computation for task 30au9ab.18587.12176.840922.3.98_0 finished
2006-05-27 20:02:12 [SETI@home] Starting task 30au99ab.18587.12176.840922.3.91_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 515
2006-05-27 20:02:14 [SETI@home] Started upload of file 30au99ab.18587.12176.840922.3.98_0_0
2006-05-27 20:02:18 [SETI@home] Finished upload of file 30au99ab.18587.12176.840922.3.98_0_0
2006-05-27 20:02:18 [SETI@home] Throughput 25998 bytes/sec
2006-05-28 09:42:40 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
2006-05-28 09:42:40 [SETI@home] Reason: Requested by user
2006-05-28 09:42:40 [SETI@home] Reporting 3 tasks
2006-05-28 09:42:45 [SETI@home] Scheduler request succeeded


Some WUs process, some fail.

---

A Living example of Artificial Intelligence.

I thought all was goint to be well - but now this! Just what is going wrong this time???

Result ID 333223868
Name 27mr99aa.15051.1218.517322.3.208_1
Workunit 79917971
Created 27 May 2006 11:00:09 UTC
Sent 28 May 2006 8:16:14 UTC
Received 28 May 2006 13:55:51 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Computing
Exit status 3 (0x3)
Computer ID 1240160
Report deadline 16 Jun 2006 10:36:14 UTC
CPU time 9356.546875
stderr out

<core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
<message>
The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
ar=0.038495 NumCfft=51177 NumGauss= 0 NumPulse= 166225343616 NumTriplet= 11930737557504

</stderr_txt>

Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 4.81170852066318
Granted credit 0
application version 5.15

---

Check and see if you have the latest updated version, which is 5.4.9.

Yes, I am running the latest version. The computer it locked on was not a dual. It was a centrion laptop 1.6 gig.

---

'S rioghal mo dhream

I have been receiving numerous "Unrecoverable errors" after upgrading to the standard SETI enhanced (NOT an optimized version). I manually upgraded the BOINC client to 5.4.9 and still get errors. The error that I keep receiving is an Access Violation in the worker thread. My computer is NOT the only computer for that workunit that had the unrecoverable error on this workunit. Several computers had failed on that workunit.

There's nothing in the Messages tab for a couple hours before the error.

5/28/2006 9:54:25 AM|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 30au99ab.18587.6898.842330.3.44_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))

This has happened to me on multiple work units, but it only happens on one of my computers -- that computer has hyperthreading turned on.

As an example of the "read" see

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=332045423

or for a slightly different "write" access violation see

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=332045424

The error from resultid 332045423 is:
----------------------
*** Dump of the Worker thread (b54): ***

- Information -
Status: Ready, Kernel Time: 5468750.000000, User Time: 255525470208.000000, Wait Time: 6874730.000000

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004D2213 read attempt to address 0x0000001A

- Registers -
eax=00000002 ebx=0133ea70 ecx=00000000 edx=00000005 esi=0000000a edi=015cdea0
eip=004d2213 esp=0133ea4c ebp=0133ea84
cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00010202

- Callstack -
ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
0133ea84 004c7e85 015cdea0 004e4f10 02df0030 0040678a setiathome_5.15_windows_intelx8!+0x0
0133ea94 0040678a 015cdec0 00534c7c 004e4f10 0133f934 setiathome_5.15_windows_intelx8!+0x0
02df0030 3c26d522 3978dbc0 3c10e519 3c09790d 3c042f1d setiathome_5.15_windows_intelx8!+0x0
SymFromAddr(): GetLastError = '126' Address = '3c26d522'
SymGetLineFromAddr(): GetLastError = '126' Address = '3c26d522'
SymGetModuleInfo(): GetLastError = '126' Address = '3c26d522'
3c38fda1 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 setiathome_5.15_windows_intelx8!+0x0

--------------
whereas in resultid 332045424 it is a "write" access violation

*** Dump of the Worker thread (224): ***

- Information -
Status: Waiting, Wait Reason: UserRequest, Kernel Time: 6093750.000000, User Time: 97964376064.000000, Wait Time: 635437.000000

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00EBF62A write attempt to address 0x00000080

---------------

Ideas? It's really disappointing to crunch for hours and then error out.

Douglas

I got a stuck Task (enhanced) today. It ran for over 7 hours until i saw that there was only 0,003% done. I then restarted BOINC-Service but the wu just restarted without going over 0,003%. The Grafics Windows shows all Infos except the Graphs. The app uses 100% of CPU but no processing is done. As i write this i will abort this wu.
Edit: After posting and aborting i got the same problem with other wus. I listed them below too. I also made two screenshots: short after start and some later

The Tasks i aborted:
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.149_3
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.151_0
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.141_0
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.132_1
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.134_1
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.133_2
14ja99aa.26346.1664.328402.3.152_2

These Tasks are using setiathome_enhanced version 515 with BOINC-Client 5.4.9 (Service Install) on WindowsXP SP2 (german)

---

BOINC Doc | Team-Site | BOINC-Podcast

I must say that I am beginning to get frustrated. I have had a 3rd wu freeze up today on two different machines. This last one is froze at 93%. It shows 11 hrs of time with 1 hr+ to go. I just saw it. I have no idea how long this has been like this. None of my computers are overclocked and all are running the new seti enhanced. I see that I am not alone in this problem. Is Berkley working on correcting this error?

---

'S rioghal mo dhream

Seti Enhanced crashed again. This time it put up a popup box that says "Runtime error! Program ...athome.berkeley.edu\\setiathome_5.15_windows_intelx86.exe This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information."

This time the only error message in the "Messages tab" was this:

5/28/2006 8:45:33 PM|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 30au99ab.18587.6898.842330.3.27_1 (The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3))

Douglas

Ok guys,

Take a look at this one:
30mr99aa.18655.14033.504824.3.239_1
Result ID 332988107
Name 30mr99aa.18655.14033.504824.3.239_2
Workunit 79864132
Created 26 May 2006 16:23:43 UTC
Sent 27 May 2006 21:23:34 UTC
Received ---
Server state In Progress
Outcome Unknown
Client state New
Exit status 0 (0x0)
Computer ID 2425779
Report deadline 23 Jun 2006 19:34:21 UTC
CPU time 0
stderr out

Validate state Initial
Claimed credit 0
Granted credit 0
application version ---

Result ID
click for details Computer Sent Time reported
or deadline
explain Server state
explain Outcome
explain Client state
explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit
332988105 403035 27 May 2006 21:23:28 UTC 23 Jun 2006 19:34:15 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---
332988106 1027193 27 May 2006 21:23:44 UTC 23 Jun 2006 19:34:31 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---
332988107 2425779 27 May 2006 21:23:34 UTC 23 Jun 2006 19:34:21 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---
332988108 1254874 27 May 2006 21:23:30 UTC 28 May 2006 18:51:17 UTC Over Client error Computing 34,466.34 54.88 ---
333949680 --- --- --- Unsent Unknown New --- --- ---

Is this a bad workunit? This is not right. I am volounteering my computers for this project. I hope to provide good information. I can only do this if I am sent good units to work with. Does Berkley not scan these units for problems before they send them to us to crunch?
Thanks for letting me vent.

---

'S rioghal mo dhream

Strikes me that we are getting some bad work units sent out and too many of us are wasting the planet's resources proving it. As far as I know, everything is now bang up to date but computational errors and the like are wasting my time.

The most recent problem was:

Result ID 333564259
Work unit ID 80001188

The only thought I have at present is could there be some clash with Norton software?

---

It seems that a lot of Workunits created at May 26 were corrupted. Hopefully there is no problem with the client but with WU-Generation. Because all tasks generated on other days than May 26 are working.

I have no Norton-Software Installed and there are no known Problems with my AntiVirus-Scanner.

---

BOINC Doc | Team-Site | BOINC-Podcast

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=79435584
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1712890

i see i'm not alone!!! one out of 10 are not validating!!! check the work unit, eveyone has failed it.

---