...if you had not been working on the optimized apps the standard app would not be running as well as it does and I thank you for that as well.
:)

Well we (my beta testers and me) had nothing to do with that except testing one of Joe Segures patches before it was officialy integrated into the standard enhanced app.

Actually (might sound stupid) i made a promise that i'll release the optimized app. when enhanced goes public and i keep what i promised.

---

Join BOINC United now!

...if you had not been working on the optimized apps the standard app would not be running as well as it does and I thank you for that as well.
:)

Well we (my beta testers and me) had nothing to do with that except testing one of Joe Segures patches before it was officialy integrated into the standard enhanced app.

Actually (might sound stupid) i made a promise that i'll release the optimized app. when enhanced goes public and i keep what i promised.

And thats the way it should be. I totally appriciate you and all your beta testers for optmized apps. But since they threw a monkey wrench into the mix I would much rather wait till things stablize till I re-download the optimized app, as I'm not too keen on trying to change app_info stuff. :-) I'm a patient person.

---

My first enhanced work unit recycled back to zero an hour ago. The work unit was beyond 30 percent completed after eight hours of processing but is now at 5.23 percent.

---

Hi All

Since moving to Seti enhanced v5.1.2 around 9 in 10 of my work units fail to complete with the following message. "12/05/2006 00:03:30|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 01mr99aa.26277.30545.972158.3.131_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))" Obviously the date and WU ref change but the exit code is always the same. Does anyone know what this specific exit code means?

Any enlightenment would be much appreciated.

Thanks
Marts

XP with sp2
AMD Athlon XP 2800+
1024 MB RAM
Nvidia 6800 128MB
Running Windows firewall only

---

I just sent setiathome enhanced 5.13 darwin to Jeff to be signed and put into mix. Charlie thinks this should allow machines down to OS X 10.3.2 to work properly. The OS X intel version should also be coming out at the same time.

I've got an iMac that's trashing every single result (after only a few seconds) with this message:

<core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message>process got signal 5
</message>
<stderr_txt>
dyld: setiathome-5.12.powerpc-apple-darwin Undefined symbols:
setiathome-5.12.powerpc-apple-darwin undefined reference to _atanf expected to be defined in /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
setiathome-5.12.powerpc-apple-darwin undefined reference to _cosf expected to be defined in /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
setiathome-5.12.powerpc-apple-darwin undefined reference to _sinf expected to be defined in /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib

</stderr_txt>

It's G3 processor running OS 10.3.5, and it was handling SETI@home fine until the upgrade. (Boinc is running as a service.) The results page for this machine is almost solid pink. I've set SETI@home to "nomorework" for now.

---

@SETIEric@qoto.org (Mastodon)

If you can unhide your computers, I could look at the detailed error messages. It's likely that this is the problem that happens in the JPEG library. If so, I'm working on a fix.

Eric

Hi All

Since moving to Seti enhanced v5.1.2 around 9 in 10 of my work units fail to complete with the following message. "12/05/2006 00:03:30|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 01mr99aa.26277.30545.972158.3.131_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))" Obviously the date and WU ref change but the exit code is always the same. Does anyone know what this specific exit code means?

Any enlightenment would be much appreciated.

Thanks
Marts

XP with sp2
AMD Athlon XP 2800+
1024 MB RAM
Nvidia 6800 128MB
Running Windows firewall only

---

@SETIEric@qoto.org (Mastodon)

Hi All

Since moving to Seti enhanced v5.1.2 around 9 in 10 of my work units fail to complete with the following message. "12/05/2006 00:03:30|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 01mr99aa.26277.30545.972158.3.131_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))" Obviously the date and WU ref change but the exit code is always the same. Does anyone know what this specific exit code means?

Any enlightenment would be much appreciated.

Thanks
Marts

XP with sp2
AMD Athlon XP 2800+
1024 MB RAM
Nvidia 6800 128MB
Running Windows firewall only

THat exit code was mentioned earlier in this thread and it was determined that this means that you have a corrupt seti512.jpg file. You can d/l a replacement file from the Berkeley servers here .
:)

---

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

And God said"Let there be light."But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer.

- exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)

"this means that you have a corrupt seti512.jpg file. You can d/l a replacement file from the Berkeley servers"


The same error has also, but only occasionally happened to me as well. Can you please explain how a graphic can waste so much of my computer's time? The file already on the computer looked fine to me but I have downloaded a new one anyway. Fingers crossed, but surely this sort of fault can be eliminated elsewhere?

---

surely this sort of fault can be eliminated elsewhere?

Once the how is known, then the why can be figured out. Once the why has been figured out then the solution can be determined.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

Igot stuck on one WU:

26fe99aa.5731.26194.823572.3.199

After almost 20 hours of crunching, I had to restart the computer (Windows Update). When BOINC restarted, the CPU Time for that WU was only one hour!

Now it's 7 hours and it's stuck on 42.24% for a long time, so I'm gonna abort it.

---

bono_vox

5/10/2006 1:02:25 AM|SETI@home|State file error: no application version setiathome_enhanced 513

There is an SE 5.13 application, but we're testing that in Seti Beta. Sounds like there was a cross-over going on here. Or is it released here as well?

I've now got a batch of errors about 514 too:

2006-05-12 15:57:55 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
2006-05-12 15:57:55 [SETI@home] Reason: To fetch work
2006-05-12 15:57:55 [SETI@home] Requesting 1842 seconds of new work
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] WU refers to nonexistent app_version: setiathome_enhanced 514
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] Can't link workunit 30mr99aa.29736.4305.1034646.3.91 in sched reply
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] WU refers to nonexistent app_version: setiathome_enhanced 514
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] Can't link workunit 30mr99aa.29736.4305.1034646.3.98 in sched reply
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] link_result: nonexistent WU 30mr99aa.29736.4305.1034646.3.91
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] Can't link result 30mr99aa.29736.4305.1034646.3.91_2 in sched reply
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] link_result: nonexistent WU 30mr99aa.29736.4305.1034646.3.98
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] Can't link result 30mr99aa.29736.4305.1034646.3.98_3 in sched reply
2006-05-12 15:58:00 [SETI@home] No work from project

any clues yet anybody what is causing these?

---

any clues yet anybody what is causing these?

Apparently, using an app_info.xml file is causing this.

---

I've now got a batch of errors about 514 too:

<snip>

any clues yet anybody what is causing these?

I have same problem - using crunch3r's v5.12 opti and BOINC 5.4.9

14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|State file error: no application version setiathome_enhanced 514
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|Can't handle task 24fe99aa.2419.31201.592332.3.218 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|State file error: missing task 24fe99aa.2419.31201.592332.3.218
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|Can't handle task 24fe99aa.2419.31201.592332.3.218_3 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|No work from project
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|State file error: no application version setiathome_enhanced 514
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|Can't handle task 30mr99aa.29736.13601.367328.3.81 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|State file error: missing task 30mr99aa.29736.13601.367328.3.81
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|Can't handle task 30mr99aa.29736.13601.367328.3.81_0 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|No work from project

Is there a 5.14 opti or can we just edit the app_info file?

---

regards,
Tim
Founder, UK BOINC Team
Join us @ UK BOINC Team: http://www.ukboincteam.org.uk/newforum

Cununch3r apl shou;d not be used for beta.
That is te only place that 5.14 shows up.
They cannot find bugs if you use a different one other than the standard one.
Edit
I also have these message
2006-05-14 07:12:44 [SETI@home] Message from server: You may have an outdated code verification key. This may prevent you from accepting new executables. If the problem persists, detach/attach the project.
2006-05-14 07:12:44 [SETI@home] State file error: no application version setiathome_enhanced 514
2006-05-14 07:12:44 [SETI@home] Can't handle task 24fe99aa.2419.32593.361066.3.136 in scheduler reply
2006-05-14 07:12:44 [SETI@home] State file error: missing task 24fe99aa.2419.32593.361066.3.136
2006-05-14 07:12:44 [SETI@home] Can't handle task 24fe99aa.2419.32593.361066.3.136_3 in scheduler reply
2006-05-14 07:12:44 [SETI@home] No work from project
2006-05-14 07:23:00 [SETI@home] Message from server: You may have an outdated code verification key. This may prevent you from accepting new executables. If the problem persists, detach/attach the project.
2006-05-14 07:23:00 [SETI@home] State file error: no application version setiathome_enhanced 514
2006-05-14 07:23:00 [SETI@home] Can't handle task 25fe99ab.5673.25089.136088.3.230 in scheduler reply
2006-05-14 07:23:00 [SETI@home] State file error: missing task 25fe99ab.5673.25089.136088.3.230
2006-05-14 07:23:00 [SETI@home] Can't handle task 25fe99ab.5673.25089.136088.3.230_3 in scheduler reply
2006-05-14 07:23:00 [SETI@home] No work from project

Boinc must have confused the beta project with the the sdtandard setiathome project.
Unless the schedler is confused.
Setiat home still claims 5.12 is the enhanced version, except for mac which is 5.13.

---

Fred
BOINC Alpha, BOINC Beta, LHC Alpha, Einstein Alpha

5/14/2006 8:51:28 AM|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 24fe99aa.2419.23169.884652.3.165_4 (The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3))

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=325330743

Stu

---

I've now got a batch of errors about 514 too:

<snip>

any clues yet anybody what is causing these?

REPOST/EDIT:

I have same problem - using crunch3r's v5.12 opti and BOINC 5.4.9 on the "SETI@home" project NOT the "SETI@home Beta Test" - am running both so maybe BOINC IS getting confused.....but no problems these last few hours since my O/P...!


14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|State file error: no application version setiathome_enhanced 514
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|Can't handle task 24fe99aa.2419.31201.592332.3.218 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|State file error: missing task 24fe99aa.2419.31201.592332.3.218
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|Can't handle task 24fe99aa.2419.31201.592332.3.218_3 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:33:29|SETI@home|No work from project
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|State file error: no application version setiathome_enhanced 514
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|Can't handle task 30mr99aa.29736.13601.367328.3.81 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|State file error: missing task 30mr99aa.29736.13601.367328.3.81
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|Can't handle task 30mr99aa.29736.13601.367328.3.81_0 in scheduler reply
14/05/2006 10:43:41|SETI@home|No work from project

Is there a 5.14 opti or can we just edit the app_info file?

---

regards,
Tim
Founder, UK BOINC Team
Join us @ UK BOINC Team: http://www.ukboincteam.org.uk/newforum

Applications for setiathome at
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/apps.php

Applications for setiathome beta at
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/apps.php

5.14 is at beta

---

Fred
BOINC Alpha, BOINC Beta, LHC Alpha, Einstein Alpha

Here's one to puzzle over.

WinXpHome-SP2 P4+HT.

Boinc 5.4.9, Seti-Enhanced 5.08

I had one WU 'hang' at about 95% the other day and aborted it, 'cause I didn't know what else to do at the time.

Just had another one 'hang', at about 93% done.

[EDIT]

I first tried Suspend/Resume in BOINC Manager, but it still came up 'hung'

[\\EDIT]

This time I ran Process Explorer, and selected the seti task, right clicked and selected properties.

The window lists 3 modules, 2 seti...exe and one ..dll.

I selected the second seti module, and noticed that it was in a wait-suspend state.

I took a chance and clicked on the resume button in the window, and the task ran to completion.

I don't know how the task got set to that wait-suspend state, as I hadn't touched anything.

---

Here's one to puzzle over.

Boinc 5.4.9, Seti-Enhanced 5.08

OOps, too many numbers floating around. :-(

That line should read:

Boinc 5.4.9, Seti-Enhanced 513

---

Here's one to puzzle over.

Boinc 5.4.9, Seti-Enhanced 5.08

OOps, too many numbers floating around. :-(

That line should read:

Boinc 5.4.9, Seti-Enhanced 513

Of course it doesn't help that I was half asleep. :-(

Really should be 5.12

[sigh]

And this morning the same thing happened on another computer, and I did the same thing to get it going again. This one 'hung' at about 38% done.

This computer is similar to the first one reported.

WinXpHome-SP2, etc.

---