Message boards :
Number crunching :
Host that returns nothing but cr*p (7309)
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Prototype Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 67 Credit: 497,118 RAC: 0 |
http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/results.php?hostid=7309 How can this host which returns -110 (couldnt start app) be a successful result? When its not claiming 0 credits with the above its spitting out the same error but with -!- results. WTF?!?! I thought these clients were going to be removed from the project before Live started! I just hope these so called succesful 0.0 claim results are thrown out by the validator (and the host id invadiated so it doesnt get any more units)and a new client given the unit. |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 29 Mar 03 Posts: 1137 Credit: 5,334,063 RAC: 0 |
I don't think you've seen anything yet Enigma, wait until everybody starts coming in and joining up, thats when the fun's going to begin... |
Pappateam Send message Joined: 1 Oct 03 Posts: 6 Credit: 2,400,611 RAC: 0 |
Do you know what this means? 3.18 process exited with code 26 (0x1a) Results page said "Client error". About 50 (limit for a day?) of them all in same comp (17097). Other computers works fine. |
Benher Send message Joined: 25 Jul 99 Posts: 517 Credit: 465,152 RAC: 0 |
>>I just hope these so called succesful 0.0 claim results are thrown out... The new credit system is * , so if that 0.0 required 2 minutes to crunch through on your system, you would get * credit for it. In this way short WUs and long WUs make no difference for credit if your machine is continuously working on them. --------------------- >>About 50 (limit for a day?) How many CPUs are in this single machine? A typical Pentium 4 -- 2.4Gig will usually process a standard WU in about 3hrs to 3hrs 20min. To do 50 in a day would require a 7 CPU system at 2.4Gig or something equivalent. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.