Message boards :
Number crunching :
Normal AMD CPU operating temp
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Jim Send message Joined: 28 Jan 00 Posts: 614 Credit: 2,031,206 RAC: 0
|
|
Lord Tedric Send message Joined: 18 Jun 99 Posts: 204 Credit: 1,063,736 RAC: 0
|
Even with overclocking the temp. of this Pro. Ambient temp. is on average.26'C
|
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 14039 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Even with overclocking the temp. of this Pro. Then i'd suggest that the temperature readings for the CPU are incorrect (not unusual). A CPU at idle even with water cooling would struggle to be only 4°C above ambient, let alone one running at full load. Edit- tydied up attempt at HTML. Grant Darwin NT |
Lord Tedric Send message Joined: 18 Jun 99 Posts: 204 Credit: 1,063,736 RAC: 0
|
Even with overclocking the temp. of this Pro. Then is it possible to obtain an accurate reading and how?
|
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 14039 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
... Assuming there isn't excessive heatsink compund, the heatsink has been fitted correctly, the CPU fan is blowing not sucking etc, etc i'd suggest the problem is with the BOIS. One of my previous motherboards used to show the CPU around the 68°C mark, after updating the BIOS (for a different problem) the temperature readings came back down to the high 50s. At the moment cannot see the reason for 64 bit cpu's, there is very, very little software yet, even in the games market. And some of the 64 bit s/ware actually runs slower than 32bit version. Next year it may be different. On the desktop maybe, but for serious number crunching & database work there is 64bit software out there & it makes a significant difference in performance, for the better. Grant Darwin NT |
Lord Tedric Send message Joined: 18 Jun 99 Posts: 204 Credit: 1,063,736 RAC: 0
|
... Have recently upgraded to the latest BIOS release, this has made no difference to the temp. reading. If anything the temp.actually went up 1-2 'C and I wasn't dully concerned about that! I am using Gigabite's own EasyTune 4 for 'on the fly' tuning and monitoring
|
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 14039 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Then is it possible to obtain an accurate reading and how? You can only get a pretty close reading, as the accuracy of it depends on the programming in the BIOS. I'm pretty sure all x86 CPUs these days have in internal temperature sensor, if it gets above a certain point speed throttling occurs (Intel) or the CPU shuts down (AMD). Previously it used to just be a sensor on the motherboard touching the bottom of the CPU- much, much less accurate. Updating yor BIOS may give a more accurate reading, but if the system is running OK, i wouldn't worry about it. Edit- fixed up yet more typos. Grant Darwin NT |
Lord Tedric Send message Joined: 18 Jun 99 Posts: 204 Credit: 1,063,736 RAC: 0
|
Then is it possible to obtain an accurate reading and how? I wasn't worrying about it! I was otherwise quite impressed by how cool it ran.
|
Lord Tedric Send message Joined: 18 Jun 99 Posts: 204 Credit: 1,063,736 RAC: 0
|
... Is it possible (of course anythings possible) that EasyTune4 is missreading the temp. values?
|
Sir Antony Magnus ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Dec 03 Posts: 66 Credit: 997,346 RAC: 1
|
oops sorry - obviously you have done it before. 2:45 AM here and I'm as sharp as a bag of hammers right now. @ Jim : No worries, good information on that site you recommended BTW. One of my previous motherboards used to show the CPU around the 68°C mark, after updating the BIOS (for a different problem) the temperature readings came back down to the high 50s. @ Grant (SSSF) : I noticed that after updating the BIOS in mine it had the opposite result, temp readings increased. Prior to that it was reporting 42C to 47 under load. So I guess they are not always accurate. GA-K8NSC-939 + Athlon 64 3500+ + 1GB DDR400 @ Lord Tedric : Those are very good operating temps indeed. I have seen my XP's run warmer than that readily under full load your are doing fine there. With the full load that Seti places (ie your CPU never goes idle) I've seen XP's run into the 50's readily. @ BarryAZ : Appreciate the feedback Those temps are good - assuming that they are true readings. @MikeSW17 : So noted, did not even occur to me to see the differences between idle and loaded. Thanks for the feedback. Ni newly returned, not newly knighted! Ni |
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 20059 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67
|
Then is it possible to obtain an accurate reading and how? Only with a great amount of difficulty. About the best I can offer is look for one of those infrared, remote temperature meters, as you're in UK you can get them from Maplin, Infrared thermometer They also have special offer on Mains measurement plugs at £12.49, see home page special offers. |
Speedy67 & Friends Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0
|
Prescotts are a real pain. The one I'm using right now (3.0GHz, not oc'd) is crunching only SETI (2 wu's at once) at a cpu temp of 57C full load. To keep it that 'cool' it has an extra case fan and a Zalman 7000Cu. Greetings, Sander
|
|
Ricky@SETI.USA Send message Joined: 4 Sep 04 Posts: 453 Credit: 1,586,857 RAC: 0
|
My Dell has a Pentium M in it and the CPU temp right now running S@H is 85C (185F) Ricky
|
Speedy67 & Friends Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0
|
The one I'm using right now (3.0GHz, not oc'd) is crunching only SETI (2 wu's at once) at a cpu temp of 57C full load. To keep it that 'cool' it has an extra case fan and a Zalman 7000Cu. I don't believe actual temps above 75C... There must be something wrong, one way or the other. Greetings, Sander
|
|
Ricky@SETI.USA Send message Joined: 4 Sep 04 Posts: 453 Credit: 1,586,857 RAC: 0
|
The one I'm using right now (3.0GHz, not oc'd) is crunching only SETI (2 wu's at once) at a cpu temp of 57C full load. To keep it that 'cool' it has an extra case fan and a Zalman 7000Cu. This is the temp reported by SpeedFan Ricky
|
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 14039 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
I don't believe actual temps above 75C... There must be something wrong, one way or the other. I'm with Speedy67 & friends- the Pentium M, with adequate cooling, shouldn't get nearly that hot. The maximum thermal dissapation for any Pentium M CPU is less than 30W. So if something that produces 30W of heat was to reach 75 degrees C there'd have to be something wrong IMHO. Either a cooling problem (but as it's still running OK that's pretty unlikely) or the BIOS just isn't giving the correct readings. Grant Darwin NT |
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 14039 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Having said that, i just looked up the specs for the CPUs & all of Intels Mobile CPUs are rated for 100 degrees c Case temperature. Grant Darwin NT |
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 14039 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
About the best I can offer is look for one of those infrared, remote temperature meters However they only give you the temperature of what you're looking at- eg the heatsink. The core temperature of the CPU can be much higher- especially if the heatsink hasn't been fitted correctly. Grant Darwin NT |
Tern Send message Joined: 4 Dec 03 Posts: 1122 Credit: 13,376,822 RAC: 44
|
all of Intels Mobile CPUs are rated for 100 degrees c Case temperature. So when they retire from crunching, they can get jobs in coffee makers, boiling the water... great... |
|
citroja Send message Joined: 12 Dec 03 Posts: 192 Credit: 3,245,701 RAC: 0
|
I have an AMD XP 3000+ and it runs (min load) arround 48.5 deg C but when it is punding out some of my engineering simulatiosn i have hit 75 deg C, the only reason that i haven't gone above 75 is because i have a safe guard in plance where if the temp gets jumps to 75.1 deg C the computer shuts down and restarts citroja
|
©2026 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.