0.01 WU's.

Author	Message
Rookie_69 Send message Joined: 29 May 03 Posts: 86 Credit: 2,512,767 RAC: 0	Message 188204 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 13:48:09 UTC http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1350397 This guy's going to bring us down... :-( ID: 188204 ·

RRipley Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 Apr 01 Posts: 880 Credit: 23,005,843 RAC: 0	Message 188221 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 14:38:31 UTC Last modified: 12 Nov 2005, 14:42:05 UTC Weird .. 2-3 seconds crunching and done. [Link] It is starting on Nov 11th ... since then this happens. Unfortunately we cannot inform him/her that something went nuts. The smallest and largest claimed credit of every WU is ignored, so it does not matter, but it's disturbing ... ID: 188221 ·

gone thanks to mmciastro Send message Joined: 6 Aug 02 Posts: 62 Credit: 63,928 RAC: 0	Message 188229 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 15:18:54 UTC Last modified: 12 Nov 2005, 15:21:15 UTC I do not think that is going to be a problem, as in the end all his WUs are marked as invalid, see here: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1484264217 It's just a pity the system does not recognize the faulty CPU and lets it still get WUs, thus slowing down the process for everybody else. If there were too many CPUs of that kind, that would slow down operations. But as far as I know there shall be a fix for that in the next BOINC software. "I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." R.M. Nixon ID: 188229 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.