My 486 (Please Don't Laugh)

Message boards : Number crunching : My 486 (Please Don't Laugh)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 187852 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 13:26:45 UTC

I saw in Matts' post that he thinks the new "Beta" app will take 4 times longer. As a Beta tester I can say it will currently take 10 times longer. If they plan to release the new app in approximately a month, then it'll take you 120 days for a wu or 3 Wus a year. You realistically won't be able to make the deadline. They currently have a 2 month deadline.
ID: 187852 · Report as offensive
Andrew
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 20 May 99
Posts: 40
Credit: 29,416
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 187853 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 13:30:48 UTC - in response to Message 187795.  

A question: Dinosaur is currently running Win98 SE. What's the latest LINUX distribution that supports such an ancient machine? I'm running SuSE 10.0 on my "real" machines and there is no way this will run on Dinosaur. I've got SuSE 5.3 (kernel 2.0.35) in a box, but this seems really old.



You could try Vector Linux



ID: 187853 · Report as offensive
Profile Lee Carre
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 00
Posts: 1459
Credit: 58,485
RAC: 0
Channel Islands
Message 187882 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 15:45:09 UTC

surely if as suggested the "past it" 486 is put to rest and shutdown and put in a cupboard somewhere and forgotten, surely this is a waste of the hardware and resources?

most of the "cost" of cumputers is in the manufature and disposal, have a read here
ID: 187882 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 187888 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 16:00:40 UTC - in response to Message 187882.  

surely if as suggested the "past it" 486 is put to rest and shutdown and put in a cupboard somewhere and forgotten, surely this is a waste of the hardware and resources?

most of the "cost" of cumputers is in the manufature and disposal, have a read here

I just paid Newegg 115 bucks for an AMD64 Athlon 2800+ Clawhammer, but just watched an OLD P4 2.4 400Mhz processor sell for $124 (plus $11 shipping) on Ebay, maybe you could sell the 486 on ebay and buy a whole new system???? I can't believe ebay prices, sheeshh.
ID: 187888 · Report as offensive
Profile Landroval

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 188
Credit: 2,098,881
RAC: 1
United States
Message 187908 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 16:55:37 UTC - in response to Message 187888.  

I can't believe ebay prices, sheeshh.


By definition there are no bargains at any efficient auction, because you "win" by agreeing to pay more than anyone else. The more potential buyers, the greater the risk of overpaying. Having a large number of bidders favors sellers, small number of bidders favors buyers. There's a lot of behavioral-finance analysis of this kind of thing, but it's a bit off-topic here....
ID: 187908 · Report as offensive
Profile Purple Rabbit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 49
Credit: 5,820,832
RAC: 3
United States
Message 187929 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 18:20:27 UTC - in response to Message 187853.  
Last modified: 11 Nov 2005, 18:22:59 UTC

You could try Vector Linux


I'll take a look at it.

I probably couldn't give my 486 away let alone get $10 or so for it. As Martin said, it's not about efficiency or money. I have this puppy and I want to see it do something. My 30 MFlops (.22 credits/hr) is good for something. I'd pull out my Heathkit H89 (2MHz Z80 processor) if I thought I could get it to do something useful. :-) Why? Just because...no other reason.

ID: 187929 · Report as offensive
Profile Darth Dogbytes™
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 03
Posts: 7512
Credit: 2,021,148
RAC: 0
United States
Message 187940 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 18:51:38 UTC - in response to Message 187882.  

surely if as suggested the "past it" 486 is put to rest and shutdown and put in a cupboard somewhere and forgotten, surely this is a waste of the hardware and resources?

most of the "cost" of cumputers is in the manufature and disposal, have a read here


Donate it to the local museum or tech college for display purposes.

Account frozen...
ID: 187940 · Report as offensive
Scarecrow

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 00
Posts: 4520
Credit: 486,601
RAC: 0
United States
Message 187951 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 19:42:44 UTC - in response to Message 187795.  

A question: Dinosaur is currently running Win98 SE. What's the latest LINUX distribution that supports such an ancient machine? I'm running SuSE 10.0 on my "real" machines and there is no way this will run on Dinosaur. I've got SuSE 5.3 (kernel 2.0.35) in a box, but this seems really old.

A few years ago we had around 30 old 486 machines that had been retired and were living amongst the dust, spiders, and old Honeywell/Bull stuff in the storage barn.
12 of those have since been put back into regular service as router/firewall machines using the Freesco package. Freesco is Slackware Linux based, uses a 2.0.3x kernel, and runs completely off a 1.4mb floppy diskette is so desired. It can be loaded onto a HDD as well. Most of the old 486's have 16 meg of memory and a couple of the born again machines are routing/firewalling for offices with over 50 workstations and servers with varying OS's lashed up to it. Many others are doing the same jobs for in-home networks. And sadly, a couple of the old 486's headed out to Leroy's farm with us to end up on the losing end of a few small arms target practice sessions.
ID: 187951 · Report as offensive
Profile Martin A. Boegelund
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 387,485
RAC: 1
Denmark
Message 188003 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 22:17:20 UTC - in response to Message 187817.  

If you're interested, I'll post some benchmark results like the ones you provide on your site. Provided I have any success, of course...


That would be great. Especially if you would manage to run official BOINC CC (in benchmark-only mode would do) to have a couple of numbers to compare ...


I managed to run your BOINC CC's on my 486!

Benchmarks are
Official BOINC 5.2.5:
Whetstone: Timed out
Dhrystone: Timed out

Metod BOINC generic 5.2.5:
Whetstone: 18 MIPS
Dhrystone: 55 MIPS

Official BOINC 5.2.7:
Whetstone: Timed out
Dhrystone: Timed out

Metod BOINC generic 5.2.7
Whetstone: 18
Dhrystone: 48

"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?"

ID: 188003 · Report as offensive
nick
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jul 05
Posts: 284
Credit: 3,902,174
RAC: 0
United States
Message 188025 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 23:27:22 UTC

how much ram does seti need? i have a old p3 with 64mb of ram that does nothing and i want to crunch on it. can i?


ID: 188025 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 188027 - Posted: 11 Nov 2005, 23:30:58 UTC - in response to Message 188025.  

how much ram does seti need? i have a old p3 with 64mb of ram that does nothing and i want to crunch on it. can i?

it's said it needs 64Meg, but that's 64M free (not used by OS). It might work with a Linux OS and "maybe" windows, but I wouldn't count on it. NO promises. Wouldn't hurt anything to try. My P3-500 took 7-9 hours/result with optimized application. My Celeron 500 is taking 12 hours/result. Note: P3-500 died and was put to rest.
ID: 188027 · Report as offensive
Profile ThePhantom86
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Jan 02
Posts: 268
Credit: 1,970,082
RAC: 0
United States
Message 188046 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 0:39:32 UTC

Getting a 486 to crunch BOINC.....that's freaking awesome!! You might not get much credit, but just getting it to work is an achievement in itself.
ID: 188046 · Report as offensive
James Nelson
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Mar 02
Posts: 381
Credit: 4,806,382
RAC: 0
United States
Message 188050 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 0:50:28 UTC - in response to Message 187795.  

[
Now this isn't just any 486. It was originally a 486-DX66, but it's been upgraded to an AMD 586-133 (super 486 running faster with a Pentium rating of 58). Dinosaur has 64MB of RAM, but it reports 96MB. I think its reporting of 96 MB is important to get around the 64MB restriction for SETI. This is some weird motherboard thing, but I'm not complaining.

I believe that your 486 must have 32 MEGs built in with 64 Megs added on many of the older MB's had built in ram with the ability to add more.
ID: 188050 · Report as offensive
Profile Martin A. Boegelund
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 387,485
RAC: 1
Denmark
Message 188150 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 7:55:38 UTC - in response to Message 188027.  

how much ram does seti need? i have a old p3 with 64mb of ram that does nothing and i want to crunch on it. can i?

it's said it needs 64Meg, but that's 64M free (not used by OS). It might work with a Linux OS and "maybe" windows, but I wouldn't count on it. NO promises. Wouldn't hurt anything to try. My P3-500 took 7-9 hours/result with optimized application. My Celeron 500 is taking 12 hours/result. Note: P3-500 died and was put to rest.


My 486 system is currently not able to crunch Seti because of too little memory. I have 64MB installed, 61MB free, and when I try to download WU's, I'm told that it's not enough :-(
I use Debian Linux.

"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?"

ID: 188150 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 188160 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 9:03:43 UTC - in response to Message 188150.  

My 486 system is currently not able to crunch Seti

about 5 months ago I found my ole 486 DX 50 and tried to get it back up and crunching. The problem I ran into was a lack of a keyboard with that big old 1" round connector on it, and NO PS/2 mouse. LOL I trashed it.
ID: 188160 · Report as offensive
Profile Martin A. Boegelund
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 387,485
RAC: 1
Denmark
Message 188173 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 10:25:12 UTC - in response to Message 188160.  

The problem I ran into was a lack of a keyboard with that big old 1" round connector on it, and NO PS/2 mouse. LOL I trashed it.


My 486 got that exact same connector! I've still got the original keyboard, I think, but what I'm using right now is a 1"-to-PS/2 converter, and then connect it to my KVM switch. It works.
However, the mouse is different. The 486 hasn't got a PS/2 mouse port either, so I tried to connect my PS/2 mouse to the 9-pin serial port with a converter attached to my KVM-switch, like I did with the keyboard. That didn't work. Luckily I still had my serial port mouse, so I'm using that instead.
"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?"

ID: 188173 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 188176 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 10:42:33 UTC

I think you're right on the mouse,...now that I think about it. I didn't have that or a ps/2. (still don't, probably never will)
ID: 188176 · Report as offensive
Profile Legacy
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 10 Dec 99
Posts: 134
Credit: 1,778,571
RAC: 0
Singapore
Message 188186 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 12:08:39 UTC
Last modified: 12 Nov 2005, 12:09:53 UTC

You could try using a PS/2 to AT convertor for the keyboard. If I remember correctly, 486s use 9 pin serial port mice. Doubt you can buy those anymore.
ID: 188186 · Report as offensive
Daniel Schaalma
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 May 99
Posts: 297
Credit: 16,953,703
RAC: 0
United States
Message 188206 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 13:56:52 UTC

I just recently retired an AMD XP2000+ Win2000 box. I have that, and a dual PII Xeon 450MHz with 1 meg cache on each CPU, an Athlon Thunderbird 1GHz, and an Athlon 800MHz SLOT A, all sitting on my junk pile. They take up more electricity to run then they are worth for W/U production. Next week, I will be putting an AMD64 3500 online, and retiring my Athlon XP2100+, cause at 4 hours per W/U, it isn't producing enough to pay for the electricity it eats. It's RAC is only 136.56. All these machines can crunch SETI perfectly, but there has to come a point where their efficiency versus their energy consumption gets one's attention. I am trying to replace all my older, low production machines with ones that will put out enough production in W/U's to justify their energy consumption...

Regards, Daniel.
ID: 188206 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 188210 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 14:10:22 UTC
Last modified: 12 Nov 2005, 14:21:08 UTC

Ship to:

MMCIastro
123 Anytown
Mycity, SC. 12345

next day air is fine if you're paying.

[edit] I'm just bidding on the 2000 and 2100, no need for intel or OOOOOLD AMD
ID: 188210 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : My 486 (Please Don't Laugh)


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.