UPLOADING II --- I is TOOOOOO big

Author	Message
Siran d'Vel'nahr Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 7346 Credit: 44,181,323 RAC: 540	Message 138706 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:21:43 UTC - in response to Message 138705. .o0(you guys knew that was coming) Yep.... CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr XO - L L & P _\\// USS Vre'kasht NCC-33187 Winders 10 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker "Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath ID: 138706 ·

Misfit Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21803 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0	Message 138705 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:19:42 UTC .o0(you guys knew that was coming) ID: 138705 ·

Siran d'Vel'nahr Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 7346 Credit: 44,181,323 RAC: 540	Message 138704 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:15:08 UTC - in response to Message 138393. We need to think about dial up users....even my 2Meg is taking a fair time to get this thread up. PLEASE carry on here guys. So! You take it upon yourself to spawn/hijack another authors thread. Tsk tsk tsk. That is most un-cool. If the original author wanted to spawn HIS/HER own thread, they would have. I tell you what I'm going to do. I'm going to go through ALL the threads in NC and count how many have the topic of "uploads". Why ANYONE wants to rehash and rehash and rehash this topic is beyond me. We ALL know that there is a problem. The SETI/BOINC devs KNOW that there is a problem and have posted a notice about that. You can expect to see posts from me in your myriad other threads.... CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr XO - L L & P _\\// USS Vre'kasht NCC-33187 Winders 10 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker "Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath ID: 138704 ·

Jim Baize Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 May 00 Posts: 758 Credit: 149,536 RAC: 0	Message 138702 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:14:08 UTC - in response to Message 138700. Last modified: 19 Jul 2005, 1:14:41 UTC True, we've deleted all of the conversation from the last 30 minutes or so. :D Those posts were probably better off deleted anyway. Jim Might as well just hide the thread now. ID: 138702 ·

Misfit Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21803 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0	Message 138700 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:11:31 UTC Might as well just hide the thread now. ID: 138700 ·

Qui-Gon Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 2940 Credit: 19,199,902 RAC: 25	Message 138697 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:08:21 UTC - in response to Message 138696. Last modified: 19 Jul 2005, 1:09:13 UTC For the LAST TIME: deleted! ID: 138697 ·

Jim Baize Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 May 00 Posts: 758 Credit: 149,536 RAC: 0	Message 138696 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:07:33 UTC - in response to Message 138694. Last modified: 19 Jul 2005, 1:07:59 UTC deleted also ID: 138696 ·

Qui-Gon Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 2940 Credit: 19,199,902 RAC: 25	Message 138695 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:06:22 UTC - in response to Message 138694. Deleted ID: 138695 ·

Qui-Gon Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 2940 Credit: 19,199,902 RAC: 25	Message 138694 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 1:05:51 UTC - in response to Message 138691. Last modified: 19 Jul 2005, 1:06:47 UTC Deleted ID: 138694 ·

Jim Baize Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 May 00 Posts: 758 Credit: 149,536 RAC: 0	Message 138691 - Posted: 19 Jul 2005, 0:59:55 UTC - in response to Message 138612. Last modified: 19 Jul 2005, 1:05:48 UTC Ok... after reading through the rest of the posts someone else said what I initially said in this post, so I am deleting it. didn't need to be said twice. Jim From the front page July 18, 2005 We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking at a hardware solution for the short term. We are working to get a more powerful data server machine online. There are several parts to making this work and, barring any show stoppers, we hope to have it online in the next couple of days I think this statement needs expanding somewhat. more details needed. Almost like political spin... ID: 138691 ·

KB7RZF Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 4	Message 138642 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 23:40:48 UTC - in response to Message 138631. First people complain cause theres no info about the outage, then when someone posts one on the front page, everyone wants an expanation. How much more details are needed. First sentence of the posting says "We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking for a hardware solution for the short term." How much more is needed? They are working on the problem. Personally I would like these guys working at berkley to fix the problem, then if they feel we need to know what happend, then let us know. Give them a break. I'm done ranting. Jeremy From the front page July 18, 2005 We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking at a hardware solution for the short term. We are working to get a more powerful data server machine online. There are several parts to making this work and, barring any show stoppers, we hope to have it online in the next couple of days I think this statement needs expanding somewhat. more details needed. Almost like political spin... i'm not complaining, (maybe the political spin went a bit too far, i apologise), but i would like to know more about the hardware/software solutions is all. I'm quite happy to let results pile up to upload, as long as they get there eventually - i'm in no rush! And neither am I. My computer sits happily in the corner of my room crunching away, collecting wu's to upload. And if it sounded like my reply was just to you, it wasn't, and I appologize for that as well. Reading through so may threads about the same issue over and over and over again, it seems as though some just skip over the obvious places to look for answers. In previous outages, they always post more details in the Technical News area explaining in more detail what they had to do or what they need to do to fix the issue at hand. Give it time, things will run smoothly, or somewhat smoothly again. I'm sure these guys have been working on it since they got to work today. Thanks for listening. Jeremy ID: 138642 ·

DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0	Message 138631 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 23:31:15 UTC - in response to Message 138628. First people complain cause theres no info about the outage, then when someone posts one on the front page, everyone wants an expanation. How much more details are needed. First sentence of the posting says "We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking for a hardware solution for the short term." How much more is needed? They are working on the problem. Personally I would like these guys working at berkley to fix the problem, then if they feel we need to know what happend, then let us know. Give them a break. I'm done ranting. Jeremy From the front page July 18, 2005 We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking at a hardware solution for the short term. We are working to get a more powerful data server machine online. There are several parts to making this work and, barring any show stoppers, we hope to have it online in the next couple of days I think this statement needs expanding somewhat. more details needed. Almost like political spin... i'm not complaining, (maybe the political spin went a bit too far, i apologise), but i would like to know more about the hardware/software solutions is all. I'm quite happy to let results pile up to upload, as long as they get there eventually - i'm in no rush! ID: 138631 ·

KB7RZF Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 4	Message 138628 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 23:23:53 UTC - in response to Message 138612. Last modified: 18 Jul 2005, 23:28:33 UTC First people complain cause theres no info about the outage, then when someone posts one on the front page, everyone wants an expanation. How much more details are needed. First sentence of the posting says "We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking at a hardware solution for the short term." How much more is needed? They are working on the problem. Personally I would like these guys working at berkley to fix the problem, then if they feel we need to know what happend, then let us know. Give them a break. I'm done ranting. Jeremy From the front page July 18, 2005 We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking at a hardware solution for the short term. We are working to get a more powerful data server machine online. There are several parts to making this work and, barring any show stoppers, we hope to have it online in the next couple of days I think this statement needs expanding somewhat. more details needed. Almost like political spin... ID: 138628 ·

Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 875 Credit: 4,386,984 RAC: 0	Message 138627 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 23:22:38 UTC I'm just "happy" to see others have the same troubles I have ;) I did get one through today though ID: 138627 ·

Dunc Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Jul 02 Posts: 129 Credit: 2,166,460 RAC: 0	Message 138616 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 23:11:06 UTC Last modified: 18 Jul 2005, 23:11:27 UTC I have had some out of date wus credited :-) Linky My host is 1016758 which is 2 days late. Overdue as a result of proxy problems my end, aswell as the current upload problems. Not through having negligent cache size ;-) Dunc ID: 138616 ·

Fuzzy Hollynoodles Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 9659 Credit: 251,998 RAC: 0	Message 138613 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 23:07:08 UTC From this post! Thanks Byron! "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me ID: 138613 ·

DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0	Message 138612 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 23:05:21 UTC - in response to Message 138603. From the front page July 18, 2005 We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking at a hardware solution for the short term. We are working to get a more powerful data server machine online. There are several parts to making this work and, barring any show stoppers, we hope to have it online in the next couple of days I think this statement needs expanding somewhat. more details needed. Almost like political spin... ID: 138612 ·

KB7RZF Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 4	Message 138603 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 22:52:40 UTC From the front page July 18, 2005 We are still trying to figure out if there is a software reason for the connection drops but are looking at a hardware solution for the short term. We are working to get a more powerful data server machine online. There are several parts to making this work and, barring any show stoppers, we hope to have it online in the next couple of days ID: 138603 ·

Astro Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0	Message 138540 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 21:41:34 UTC Last modified: 18 Jul 2005, 21:43:12 UTC @ulrich, You might have something there. My Athlonxp 2200+ doesn't upload well at all, but my AMD64 Athlon 3700+ gets most WUs uploaded at some time. strange. [edit] additional note. My 2200 has a d/l quota of 1/day since I had to reload my OS a couple times and lost WUs. My 3700 has a quota of 100/day. ID: 138540 ·

Ulrich Metzner Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Jul 02 Posts: 1253 Credit: 13,565,513 RAC: 31	Message 138530 - Posted: 18 Jul 2005, 21:23:58 UTC I see a strange pattern in this... I have 3 computers running. 2 of them are uploading lousy, but they do to some point. The third 'puter isn't uploading at all. They all use the same proxy of mine. This third one is the slowest of them all (P-III-M 1 GHz) and it is the one wich hasn't uploaded a single result since this whole mess started. This really scks big time! Aloha, Uli* ID: 138530 ·

©2020 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.