Message boards :
Number crunching :
UPLOADING II --- I is TOOOOOO big
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Tigher Send message Joined: 18 Mar 04 Posts: 1547 Credit: 760,577 RAC: 0
|
Can I add a further refinement. If each boinc client indicated how low it was on work the ucb dl server could say yes or no to requests quite quickly. This would see cpu time and bandwidth reserved for upload and only give work to nearly dry clients. I guess the same scheme could be applied to upload also. That way there is a balancing of the ul/dl server to meet demands plus urgent running dry situations. |
Jim Baize Send message Joined: 6 May 00 Posts: 758 Credit: 149,536 RAC: 0
|
The server is recieveing results. I cannot make a statement about capacity, but I know that some of the results are getting through. Jim So, are any of the results being uploaded? Is the server receiving uploads at full capacity, or is the server not receiving any uploads? |
|
Josh Abbott Send message Joined: 30 Jun 03 Posts: 11 Credit: 11,736 RAC: 0
|
So, are any of the results being uploaded? Is the server receiving uploads at full capacity, or is the server not receiving any uploads? |
Jim Baize Send message Joined: 6 May 00 Posts: 758 Credit: 149,536 RAC: 0
|
This post is a follow up post from here. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=16939#138396 I think both ideas have merit. I just don't have enough knowlege or practical experience to know which one would be better or easier to impliment. Jim |
Tigher Send message Joined: 18 Mar 04 Posts: 1547 Credit: 760,577 RAC: 0
|
|
©2020 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.