Message boards :
Number crunching :
Uploading
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 15 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91 |
Now this is beyond weird. I had 26 WU's ready to upload and the list was getting longer. So I hit retry on each one followed by Abort Transfer and lo and behold, they went through! It doesn't seem right that aborting transfer would return a workunit successfully. To me aborting a transfer would be to abandon that result. Have you received credit for any of those results? I don't see where you just returned 26 results successfully. I do see on one of your computers that you have almost nothing but download errors. I think this was a common problem with ver 4.13 which you are still running on that computer. |
kev1701e Send message Joined: 28 Dec 99 Posts: 138 Credit: 10,216,553 RAC: 0 |
Now this is beyond weird. I had 26 WU's ready to upload and the list was getting longer. So I hit retry on each one followed by Abort Transfer and lo and behold, they went through! sonofagun! It works. kev X2 4400+,4200+ @2.75GHz, XP1800+ @1.65GHz, P4 @1.6GHz |
Misfit Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 |
I tried it with this WU. Let's see what it reports. I noticed there was a quick "upload failed" message in the transfer section. It's logical that it didn't report and will timeout. I'm thinking all you did was kill off your WUs and wasted all that crunch time. |
[HWU] GHz & CO. - BOINC.Italy Send message Joined: 1 Jul 02 Posts: 139 Credit: 1,466,611 RAC: 0 |
Many users have hundred Work Unit that can't upload, and that passes the deadline today or tomorrow. What happen in the case that they can't upload? I hope that the backlog of transitioners and validators is soo long to brake the losting of that wu :( GHz BOINC.Italy |
Simplex0 Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 124 Credit: 205,874 RAC: 0 |
It just gets me mad when someone says there aint a problem.....when there clearly is. Some are like horses in blinkers....they don't even know its daylight! "July 15, 2005 The data server is continuing to drop connections, which is very unusual this long after an outage. We are working to figure out why." Well, at least they now have found and try to solve the non exiting problem and the only remaining problem I have i uploading. By the way, you don't have a Norwegian blue parrot? ;) |
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91 |
I tried it with this WU. Let's see what it reports. I noticed there was a quick "upload failed" message in the transfer section. It's logical that it didn't report and will timeout. I'm thinking all you did was kill off your WUs and wasted all that crunch time. I got curious also and aborted one of my results. I saw another thread where someone said to abort results to get them to upload. All it does is make them go away. This is the result I aborted: result My result got a validate error and the other two are now waiting concensus. I think the goofy behavior is aborting results thinking that will solve the upload problem. I hope no one takes that advise. |
Ocean Archer Send message Joined: 11 Jun 04 Posts: 148 Credit: 504,219 RAC: 0 |
Now this is beyond weird. I had 26 WU's ready to upload and the list was getting longer. So I hit retry on each one followed by Abort Transfer and lo and behold, they went through! You may have hit on something here. I only had one hung up in the Transfers Tab with repetive -106 errors. Hitting 'Retry' followed by 'Abort Transfer' cleared the Transfer file and changed the Status column under the Work Tab from 'Uploading' to 'Ready to Report'. Switching to the Projects Tab and hitting 'Update' caused the WU to transfer successfully. I'm beginning to wonder if there is some type of glitch in BOINC Manager, in the way completed work is identified/stored under the Transfer Tab, which prevents the completed work from being forwarded to the project properly. |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
I would advise anyone thinking of trying the "Abort transfer" route to record the WU number and then to see if it's reported to Seti properly or still on the manager. If it's not then YOU'VE just wasted the WUs and I wouldn't recommend this for anyone until someone proves that they will get credit for the WU. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Checking OA's uploaded unit against m00kie's uploaded units, they seem to be going out with a Validate error. Unless m00kie tried it on his Winodws XP pc.. but that one is almost only returning Client errors. I'd still think that even if you sequence Retry with Abort, that the last command will be done. You're aborting units, not uploading them. That you see the Report message, is just so you tell the server you aborted the unit. |
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91 |
If you abort the transfer you WILL not get credit for that result. It does not hurt anything to let the completed results sit in the queue until the upload problem is fixed. It might look like the result is successfully transfered but it WILL not validate. I made a post earlier to show what happens. Take a look at it. |
Ocean Archer Send message Joined: 11 Jun 04 Posts: 148 Credit: 504,219 RAC: 0 |
I'll have to agree with BillBarto on this issue ... the WU did in fact transfer, but it received a "Validation Error" when looked at by the validator. There appears to be some kind of problem here, but it needs eyes more capable than mine to discover the cause/fix ... |
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91 |
I'll have to agree with BillBarto on this issue ... the WU did in fact transfer, but it received a "Validation Error" when looked at by the validator. There is no problem here. What is so hard to understand about the phrase "abort transfer". When you abort transfer you delete the result file. when you report, it reports that the transfer was aborted. |
tekwyzrd Send message Joined: 21 Nov 01 Posts: 767 Credit: 30,009 RAC: 0 |
I haven't had a successful upload since 15 Jul 2005 20:21:54 UTC It's a good thing I still have almost 10 days before the due date of units that are trying to upload. I'm going to let it do the work I have and disable seti until they figure this out. I'll run some LHC@home instead. |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 21118 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
I haven't had a successful upload since 15 Jul 2005 20:21:54 UTC... Well, some are scraping through ok, for example just now: 2005-07-16 18:29:40 [SETI@home] Started upload of 09ja05aa.26577.21746.92334.97_3_0 2005-07-16 18:30:03 [SETI@home] Finished upload of 09ja05aa.26577.21746.92334.97_3_0 2005-07-16 18:30:03 [SETI@home] Throughput 5514 bytes/sec Good luck and patience, Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
KB7RZF Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 2 |
From the front page. July 15, 2005 The data server is continuing to drop connections, which is very unusual this long after an outage. We are working to figure out why. Mine get thru every once in a while, but it sure does take long. |
GaryV2 Send message Joined: 20 Jul 04 Posts: 13 Credit: 55,714 RAC: 0 |
First time I've received these message sequences.. 7/15/2005 7:28:17 PM|SETI@home|Started upload of 16ja05ab.8978.12161.928404.250_1_0 7/15/2005 7:28:50 PM|SETI@home|Error on file upload: can't lock file /disks/koloth/a/users/boincadm/projects/sah/upload/2ce/16ja05ab.8978.12161.928404.250_1_0: Error 0 locked by PID=82792 7/15/2005 7:28:50 PM|SETI@home|Temporarily failed upload of 16ja05ab.8978.12161.928404.250_1_0: -127 7/15/2005 7:28:50 PM|SETI@home|Backing off 9 minutes and 45 seconds on upload of file 16ja05ab.8978.12161.928404.250_1_0 7/15/2005 8:11:17 PM|SETI@home|Started download of 08fe05ab.2204.5216.959636.252 7/15/2005 8:11:25 PM|SETI@home|Temporarily failed download of 08fe05ab.2204.5216.959636.252: 404 7/15/2005 8:11:25 PM|SETI@home|Giving up on download of 08fe05ab.2204.5216.959636.252: file was not found on server 7/15/2005 8:11:25 PM|SETI@home|Checksum or signature error for 08fe05ab.2204.5216.959636.252 7/15/2005 8:11:25 PM|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 08fe05ab.2204.5216.959636.252_2 (WU download error: couldn't get input files: 08fe05ab.2204.5216.959636.252 -163 file was not found on server) 7/15/2005 8:11:26 PM|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds |
Tigher Send message Joined: 18 Mar 04 Posts: 1547 Credit: 760,577 RAC: 0 |
First time I've received these message sequences.. You might want to post this in Paul Buck's thread on error messages for the Wiki. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=15296 |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Error -163 means it's a missing file on the Seti server. How it can be missing, I don't know, but that's what it is. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Duplicate posting |
DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0 |
First time I've received these message sequences.. I had something similar... 16/07/2005 01:23:31|SETI@home|Started download of 09ja05aa.27346.26225.373564.229 16/07/2005 01:23:39|SETI@home|Temporarily failed download of 09ja05aa.27346.26225.373564.229: 404 16/07/2005 01:23:39|SETI@home|Giving up on download of 09ja05aa.27346.26225.373564.229: file was not found on server 16/07/2005 01:23:39|SETI@home|Checksum or signature error for 09ja05aa.27346.26225.373564.229 16/07/2005 01:23:39|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 09ja05aa.27346.26225.373564.229_1 (WU download error: couldn't get input files: 09ja05aa.27346.26225.373564.229 -163 file was not found on server) 16/07/2005 01:23:40|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.