Hiding computers??@#$?

Message boards : Number crunching : Hiding computers??@#$?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Terry
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 00
Posts: 153
Credit: 1,805,202
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134960 - Posted: 10 Jul 2005, 1:02:24 UTC

Cool. Who has the cable franchise in Johnson County? Intermountain Cable?
ID: 134960 · Report as offensive
Profile Celtic Wolf
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3278
Credit: 595,676
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134959 - Posted: 10 Jul 2005, 0:57:59 UTC - in response to Message 134840.  


Well you would be wrong in several locations throughout the US and Canada. For instance if you were in Paintville, KY and had cable your internet speed would be a symetric 10MB.



Actually, it's Paintsville, KY and I'm not sure if Johnson County has high speed cable or not.


They do (or should), because I helped install it at the head-end.


I'd rather speak my mind because it hurts too much to bite my tongue.

American Spirit BBQ Proudly Serving those that courageously defend freedom.
ID: 134959 · Report as offensive
Profile MJKelleher
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 2048
Credit: 1,575,401
RAC: 1
United States
Message 134890 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 22:11:15 UTC - in response to Message 134863.  

I hide my computers because a friend of mine runs seti and i don't want him to see if i add or remove or exchange a system...

That's my only reason.. Just to tease my fellow friend..

Now there is a legitimate reason!

ID: 134890 · Report as offensive
Profile Siran d'Vel'nahr
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 7346
Credit: 44,181,323
RAC: 540
United States
Message 134870 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 21:44:09 UTC - in response to Message 134857.  
Last modified: 9 Jul 2005, 21:44:45 UTC

Are you saying, then, that I'm under suspicion because I chose to have my computers hidden? Hmmmm....

I think you're safe. If you've only managed to get 50K credits by cheating in all the time you've been here, then you're doing it wrong. LOL

now if you had 2,000,000 credits and a RAC of 121, then I'd be suspicious.

Shhhhhhhh.... Don't say that too loud. It's supposed to be a secret. >;-)

CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr XO - L L & P _\\//
USS Vre'kasht NCC-33187
Winders 10 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath
ID: 134870 · Report as offensive
Profile -= Vyper =-
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 99
Posts: 1630
Credit: 1,065,191,981
RAC: 5,753
Sweden
Message 134863 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 21:15:31 UTC

I hide my computers because a friend of mine runs seti and i don't want him to see if i add or remove or exchange a system...

That's my only reason.. Just to tease my fellow friend..


_________________________________________________________________________
Addicted to SETI crunching!
Founder of GPU Users Group
ID: 134863 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 134857 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 21:07:36 UTC - in response to Message 134821.  

Are you saying, then, that I'm under suspicion because I chose to have my computers hidden? Hmmmm....

I think you're safe. If you've only managed to get 50K credits by cheating in all the time you've been here, then you're doing it wrong. LOL

now if you had 2,000,000 credits and a RAC of 121, then I'd be suspicious.

ID: 134857 · Report as offensive
Terry
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 00
Posts: 153
Credit: 1,805,202
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134840 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 20:03:06 UTC - in response to Message 134832.  


Well you would be wrong in several locations throughout the US and Canada. For instance if you were in Paintville, KY and had cable your internet speed would be a symetric 10MB.



Actually, it's Paintsville, KY and I'm not sure if Johnson County has high speed cable or not.
ID: 134840 · Report as offensive
Profile Celtic Wolf
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3278
Credit: 595,676
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134832 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 19:30:31 UTC - in response to Message 134773.  


While it is true that we can't tell for certain... We CAN make an educated guess. Check out your upload/download speeds. If, for instance, the download speed is several times what is normal for 'home' class internet connections, either you are a college student living in a dorm room with a RESNET connection... Or, you are running that box at work.


Well you would be wrong in several locations throughout the US and Canada. For instance if you were in Paintville, KY and had cable your internet speed would be a symetric 10MB. Many Cable companies are starting to install Fiber to the Premise(FTTP) connections.

The key point here is if I wanted to get information I wouldn't be using what I can see from the SETI site when viewing computer information. I know much better ways to get information.



I'd rather speak my mind because it hurts too much to bite my tongue.

American Spirit BBQ Proudly Serving those that courageously defend freedom.
ID: 134832 · Report as offensive
Profile Siran d'Vel'nahr
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 7346
Credit: 44,181,323
RAC: 540
United States
Message 134821 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 18:37:02 UTC - in response to Message 134773.  

....
....

....
Both of these situtations are not allowed by the S@H project, so therefore the suspicion level should GREATLY increase on someone that DOES have 'hidden' computers,
....

Are you saying, then, that I'm under suspicion because I chose to have my computers hidden? Hmmmm....
....
Hiding the computers only makes helping you when you have problems a LOT harder. ....

Not sure I agree here.... If I were to seek help, I would include the basics of my computer[s] so that my problem can be analyzed WITHOUT someone telling me they need more information about my system[s] to give help. I've done it in the past, and, if need be, I will do it in the future.

CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr XO - L L & P _\\//
USS Vre'kasht NCC-33187
Winders 10 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath
ID: 134821 · Report as offensive
ric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 03
Posts: 482
Credit: 666,047
RAC: 0
Switzerland
Message 134795 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 17:24:34 UTC - in response to Message 134773.  

[quoteThere is no LEGITIMATE reason to hide your computers. Hiding the computers only fosters mistrust. Get rid of it. [/quote]

That I would not underline, as you mentioned it, it's youropinion..

The "hide" possibility is part of the design and has it's grants therefore.

I can't write for other opinions than mine, doing the boinc since now more than a year, it happen to get more host entries (= database entries) than
really having, in various circumstances/situation.

Just upgrade from time to time the boinc clients, -->new host entry.

milti boot the same PC with windows2000 or XP and crunch the same work, often generates a new entry. Playing with full automated OS installation, this, you know it, --> new host entry.

When you descide to support for a while an other project than an actual,
because xyz and you detach the host from a project and later reattach it
--> new host entry.

There are probaly plenty more technical reasons why this can happen.

The fact is, the host list is "wrong".

People are not used to read whats written there (looking to deep rac)
they only count the number of entries and believe they are right.

Some are taking the time and try to read waht's written there, but you can count them fast.

To everybody it happens, when crunching 10'000 or more WUs, that one can be brocken.

What are people doing? they start a Hexenjagt, a hunt for the gulty.

one more time, it's part of the design of boinc, just use it or not use it.

I'm very happy, that I could make this descision myself;)

I do accept, some people might have a problem because some are hiding their equipment, but myself, I don't care about.

Bad is, if somebody askes for help and is hiding the host(s), so support is not possible, you mentioned it already.

You mentioned it too, to the project stuff, all informations
are availale anyway.

curiosity kills the cat!

keep crunching


ID: 134795 · Report as offensive
Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 00
Posts: 2892
Credit: 1,499,890
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134773 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 16:36:59 UTC - in response to Message 134730.  

Well... yes, but how about from one of those computers that aren't his? He can be "outed" and maybe fired.

Someone who isn't logged in as can't see the identifying information from those computers, either. If you look at mine, you won't be able to tell which is sitting on my desktop at home, and which is on my desk at work. I'm not outed.


While it is true that we can't tell for certain... We CAN make an educated guess. Check out your upload/download speeds. If, for instance, the download speed is several times what is normal for 'home' class internet connections, either you are a college student living in a dorm room with a RESNET connection... Or, you are running that box at work.

On the subject of 'hidden' computers, that feature only serves the purpose of keeping other participants from seeing a small subset of the information on that person's computers. You don't hide ANYTHING from Berkeley; Berkeley maintains all the information, its just not visible over the regular webpages. There are too many participants for the Staff at Berkeley to police, so limiting access to this data only serves one purpose: to keep curious/nosey participants from figuring out that the 'paranoid' participant might be doing something 'funny'. Such as either they have an unauthorized BORG, or that they are trying a cheat. Both of these situtations are not allowed by the S@H project, so therefore the suspicion level should GREATLY increase on someone that DOES have 'hidden' computers, especially since the amount of information visible to someone other than the 'owning participant' is reduced even when the computer is NOT hidden (nothing really identifiable is present in the computer listing, except to the 'owner' when they are logged in).

In my opinion, the option to 'hide' your computers should be removed. Hiding the computers only makes helping you when you have problems a LOT harder. There is no LEGITIMATE reason to hide your computers. Hiding the computers only fosters mistrust. Get rid of it.


https://youtu.be/iY57ErBkFFE

#Texit

Don't blame me, I voted for Johnson(L) in 2016.

Truth is dangerous... especially when it challenges those in power.
ID: 134773 · Report as offensive
Profile MJKelleher
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 2048
Credit: 1,575,401
RAC: 1
United States
Message 134730 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 12:47:07 UTC - in response to Message 134722.  

Well... yes, but how about from one of those computers that aren't his? He can be "outed" and maybe fired.

Someone who isn't logged in as can't see the identifying information from those computers, either. If you look at mine, you won't be able to tell which is sitting on my desktop at home, and which is on my desk at work. I'm not outed.

ID: 134730 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134728 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 12:42:37 UTC - in response to Message 134722.  

Well... yes, but how about from one of those computers that aren't his? He can be "outed" and maybe fired.

Then he/she should not be using those computers anyway ...
ID: 134728 · Report as offensive
Profile SoNic

Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 00
Posts: 140
Credit: 2,963,627
RAC: 0
Romania
Message 134722 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 11:55:51 UTC

Well... yes, but how about from one of those computers that aren't his? He can be "outed" and maybe fired.
ID: 134722 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15157
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 6
Netherlands
Message 134641 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 4:35:04 UTC - in response to Message 134622.  

Another reason is that they are using computers that are not belonging to them. And they don't want that to be seen (those computers will show the network names from that network).

Only the owner sees the computers by name. All we see is the owner's name if he chooses to show his computers. Not the computer name, thus not the name selected by the network.

ID: 134641 · Report as offensive
scatter
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 May 05
Posts: 10
Credit: 33,168
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134635 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 4:24:41 UTC - in response to Message 134631.  

Oh man, picking on the Hungarians. For shame!







and you're absolutely right, as far as SETI goes I'm a n00b. good job captain obvious! *jokes
ID: 134635 · Report as offensive
Profile Fuzzy Hollynoodles
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 9659
Credit: 251,998
RAC: 0
Message 134631 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 4:20:39 UTC - in response to Message 134624.  

Oh man, picking on the Hungarians. For shame!






"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me

ID: 134631 · Report as offensive
Profile Misfit
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 01
Posts: 21803
Credit: 2,815,091
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134624 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 4:01:47 UTC - in response to Message 134596.  

Oh man, picking on the Hungarians. For shame!
me@rescam.org
ID: 134624 · Report as offensive
Profile SoNic

Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 00
Posts: 140
Credit: 2,963,627
RAC: 0
Romania
Message 134622 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 4:00:13 UTC

Another reason is that they are using computers that are not belonging to them. And they don't want that to be seen (those computers will show the network names from that network).
ID: 134622 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15157
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 6
Netherlands
Message 134596 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 3:07:17 UTC - in response to Message 134595.  
Last modified: 9 Jul 2005, 3:09:12 UTC

Sure... Try it in this one as well.

(p.s.: Can you dumb it down even more then? The BS level can go into the negative?)
ID: 134596 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Hiding computers??@#$?


 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.