The rankings are "a little bit" skewed when individuals put SETI on a hundred computer network at their jobsite, and the rest of us only have ONE.
Let individual rankings be based on one (their best) computer and save multi-computer systems for team stats.

> The rankings are "a little bit" skewed when individuals put SETI on a hundred
> computer network at their jobsite, and the rest of us only have ONE.
> Let individual rankings be based on one (their best) computer and save
> multi-computer systems for team stats.
>

I agree, but don't think the number of computers that one has should be a factor. But I do think there should be a "corporate rankings" for crunchers using their company's computers and a "personal rankings" for crunchers using their personal computers at home. I would like to compare how I stack up against others that crunch@home. If I was ever to aquire enough computers (I'm working on it...) then I would also like to compare myself to the ones that crunch@work.


<a> [/url]

> The rankings are "a little bit" skewed when individuals put SETI on a
> hundred
> computer network at their jobsite, and the rest of us only have ONE.
> Let individual rankings be based on one (their best) computer and save
> multi-computer systems for team stats.


If you run just one computer, its very easy to see where you stack up. Just choose "top computers" on the stats and leaderboards page. each computer says who it belongs to.

Although I know where you are coming from. We run 5 computers here at home, I'd like to see how we stack up with others running 5 hosts, all in good fun of course!

Crunch on!

It's no different than it was with S@H-1 though. Lot's of people had many PC's all under one computer account as individuals.

I hope they work on how they display the rankings and such. I'd like to see where I stand more easily. Against everyone, against my "class", etc

How about comparing people with the same amount of PC's?

1 vs 1
2 vs 2
3 vs 3
875 vs 875

Etc...

That would be interesting. At least with BOINC you can see how many PC's everyone has. It'll all work out... give it time.


Everyday with BOINC brings new surprises :)
Total: 10249.61
RAC: 634.26
Pending: Eleventy Gazillion

~Michael
"They better be out there, I think we need their help"

> I agree, but don't think the number of computers that one has should be a
> factor. But I do think there should be a "corporate rankings" for crunchers
> using their company's computers and a "personal rankings" for crunchers using
> their personal computers at home. I would like to compare how I stack up
> against others that crunch@home. If I was ever to aquire enough computers (I'm
> working on it...) then I would also like to compare myself to the ones that
> crunch@work.
>

You're right and that's fair. If someone has invested their own ca$h into multiple systems then they should get the credit for it. The trouble with the way things are set up now is there is no way to tell what's corporate and what's personal.

> If you run just one computer, its very easy to see where you stack up. Just
> choose "top computers" on the stats and leaderboards page. each computer says
> who it belongs to.
>
> Although I know where you are coming from. We run 5 computers here at home,
> I'd like to see how we stack up with others running 5 hosts, all in good fun
> of course!
>

I've practically given up on those leader boards and their "20 at a time" screens. At least with Seti classic it would have a continual list. 20 per screen helps out our dial-up friends but for the rest of broadband users it would be nice to have an option to see the list at once.

I've practically given up on those leader boards and their "20 at a time" screens. At least with Seti classic it would have a continual list. 20 per screen helps out our dial-up friends but for the rest of broadband users it would be nice to have an option to see the list at once.

=================================================

Remember E.T. you only have to click next 20 once then you can edit the URL line to go to whatever range you want immediately. Makes it much faster when you're trying to find your team and you currently rank over 11,000.

> Remember E.T. you only have to click next 20 once then you can edit the URL
> line to go to whatever range you want immediately. Makes it much faster when
> you're trying to find your team and you currently rank over 11,000.
>
>
Ugh, more editing. Well I tried that and its a real pain going thru THOUSANDS of entries just to find mine. I looked at my computer under my own account and unfortunately there isn't a ranking there. It would be nice if that could be added. Otherwise, I just find it easier using a scroll wheel with it all listed at once. Just my personal pref.

I agree with you, I would like to have my and my teams rankings right on my account page. But I suppose that will have to wait till they get the other bugs worked out.
On the bright side think of it this way. If you know your exact total credit's you can start at offset=5000 then move to 10,000. If you're in between there somewhere just divide by half each time and at most you would only have to try 8 times to get to the page with your listing!

@Jodeum

Good golly, Miss Molly, sure like a ball. ... ;-)
no problem new finised WU for the Team stats are on the Way
we come in the top 1000 of the teams soon !
greetings guido
[/url] [/url]
Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-)

@Jodeum
oops forgotten to say on the fast computer need
a WU to finised
~from 2 hours 10 minutes TO 2 hours 40 minutes
so many of it on one day ;-)))
Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-)

test
Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-)

Team T.-C 627.77 ;-)
Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-)

> If you run just one computer, its very easy to see where you stack up. Just
> choose "top computers" on the stats and leaderboards page. each computer says
> who it belongs to.
>
>

That doesnt even really work. If you look at the number 1 ranking machine it is a 3.06GHz P4 with 898 RAC. I know my P4 2.4 @ 3.0GHz only manages about 145 RAC. I think most of the top computers are really multiple computers with the results merged unless my P4 really is only about 25% as powerful as that 3.06GHz machine.

> Although I know where you are coming from. We run 5 computers here at home,
> I'd like to see how we stack up with others running 5 hosts, all in good fun
> of course!

Or perhaps it should be a strict CPU comparison instead of computers. Someone's 4 processor HT system (IE 8) would score a lot higher than a single non-HT processor. So in my case running a 3.4 P4 HT I'd like to see how I rank in the 2 CPU catagory.

These are my stats as of 18:45 PST

Rank Name Recent AVG Credit Total Credit
704 Tony Martin 458.35 5942.18


Rank Name Total Credit Recent AVG Credit
939 Tony Martin 5942.18 458.35



Rank Team Recent AVG Credit Total Credit
168 Stargate (SG1) 1207.05 18911.98

Go Team

<a> [/url]

at big boss ;-)Jodeum and the another team members
Team have 1000 total credits before Weekend ;-)
at this time have 801.24 ;-)
have a nice day @ll
look the helmet Sign OOPS
[/url] [/url]

Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-)

Number crunching like a DEVILs thing :-) Total credit 1077.77 TEAM ;-)
Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-)

well coz i bored and waiting for the server to give out more WU's here are my stats


Cheers Quail

<a> [/url]

Wireless Signals of the Past